Cao Cao is not about the heroes of war

Cao Cao's unification of the north of China, how can he be considered a defeated. Cao Cao felt that it was difficult to change the situation with traditional moral concepts and actions, so he coerced the Son of Heaven to order the princes, and it can be seen from his poems that he cared about the people and intended to save the common people, such as "The white bones are exposed in the wild, and there is no rooster crowing for thousands of miles." The people are left behind, and the thought breaks people's intestines.

There are also such as "Tanka Xing", people who can write such beautiful poems can be so bad that they are definitely a hero!

The Battle of Chibi, which took place in 208 AD, was a great opportunity for Cao Cao to unify China, and he had 999 successful paths, but he chose the only path that failed, and it is sad to give up halfway.

There is a hero in everyone's heart, the benevolent see the wise and the wise see the wise, Lu Xun commented: Cao Cao is a capable person and a hero!

Cao Cao is a generation of heroes, and he is a positive figure in history.

If he is not a hero, who deserves to be called a hero?

Since ancient times, heroes have been judged by victory or defeat, and there is no reason for him.

It does add a little unfairness, and victory and defeat are common things in soldiers.

Just like life, when you fall, you get up again. What I am most afraid of is that I don't have this courage and confidence. In my opinion, Cao Cao does have the courage and confidence.

But in the red cliffs, the northerners who are not accustomed to water are used, the yin and yang strategies that are not clear, and the goals that are not clear. Although the defeat does increase, it is interesting and cute.

You are at the top of the list of traitors!

This suggestion is that you listen to the evaluation of Cao Cao in the Three Kingdoms of Yi Zhongtianpin, which is very comprehensive and very illustrative of Cao Cao's person, it is highly recommended to listen, a person is not clear in a few words, hehe.

Not a hero, but a traitor in the world.

Cao Cao was not a loser, victory and defeat were a common thing in soldiers, although Cao Cao was defeated at Chibi, he unified northern China by force, and established the most powerful of the three kingdoms, Wei. Cao Cao was good at using soldiers and was a very outstanding military strategist in Chinese history. Cao Cao is a hero, a world-class talent!

There are winners and losers in wars, and just because he lost the Battle of Chibi, he cannot be said to be a loser; Gaozu was also defeated by the overlord, and finally broke the king in a battle and dominated the world.

Calculate. Heroes are not judged by success or failure.

I think it should be counted, at least he had the courage to go to war.

I've thought about it, too.

Category: Games >> single-player games.

Problem description: There is an expansion. Analysis:

Cao Cao is a "controversial figure" who has received mixed reviews for thousands of years, and it is difficult to determine the coffin. Mr. Zhou Zexiong, a writer from Shanghai, said of people's names: "The same name may make some people sigh and sigh, make some people fall in love, make some people stomp their feet, and make others afraid."

A name that is so meaningful and shiny here may be worthless in another place, not even more valuable than a dog's tail grass on the side of the road. "Cao Cao is just such a person. Praisers call him a "hero" because he made great achievements in the late Eastern Han Dynasty in eliminating filth and chaos and unifying the country.

Some people say that he is a "traitor", and he "would rather let me bear the people of the world than teach the people of the world to bear me." "Innocently killed the benefactor Lu Bohao's family. He is both civil and military, both proficient in the art of war, the author of "Sun Tzu's Brief Explanation", "The Book of Soldiers" and other books, and good at poetry, "Artemisia Travel", "Watching the Sea" and other articles, expressing his political ambitions, reflecting the suffering life of the people in the late Han Dynasty, majestic spirit, generosity and sadness.

Folklore uses "white-faced Cao Cao" to express hatred for him......The rolling Yangtze River flows eastward, the indescribable Cao Cao, and the unclear Agui.

We often say that history is true, and we have also said, "The good thing is that history is written by the people." What he means is that a person's merits and demerits will be judged by future generations. Theoretically, this view is correct.

Perhaps because future generations are far away from previous generations, past lives and ancestors, they have gotten rid of taboos and fears, and they have more courage to tell the truth. Just like the writer Lao Ghost wrote "My Mother Yang Mo", he realistically and discusses it. But for history, this can only be an assumption and an aspiration.

If the predecessors leave behind a historical record that reverses the facts, it will undoubtedly bring great difficulties and inconvenience to the judgment and evaluation of future generations, and even draw diametrically opposite conclusions due to the incompleteness and absurdity of the data. It is said that an important reason why Cao Cao was debated by later generations was that he did not order his historians at that time, according to his standards - whether it was 28 or 37 open, to write down the national chronicles, so as to leave too much room and imagination for future generations. The benevolent see the benevolent, the wise see the wise, saying that he is white is white, and saying that he is black is black.

The two sides don't know how many rounds of the battle, and it is still difficult to tell the winner.

Today's Cao Cao is no longer the real and only Cao Cao in history, but the Cao Cao who remains in the history books, street talks, stages, and movies. This Cao Cao is not a material Cao Cao, but a spiritual Cao Cao. Cao Cao is just a symbol.

The real Cao Cao, even if it is another thousand or even ten thousand years, is as confusing as the "seventy-two doubtful graves" he played in the legend.