Did the ancients outperform the skills of modern people in playing chess?

Can the ancient chess technique completely overwhelm modern people? I think it's enough. Why?

Because in ancient times, the ancients generally played Go a lot, and few people who played chess were heard of. I also because of this question, and then I checked it, and found that there was no chess hall in ancient times, but there must have been a lot of habits, at that time Go was more popular than chess, many people wanted to learn Go, and then used it to cultivate sentiment, not that people who can play Go well are people who can see the overall situation. So in ancient times, there were still many people who liked to play Go.

In ancient times, there were many national players of Go, he said that there were very few national players of chess, and there was no chess academy of Xiangqi to know that in the Ming and Qing dynasties of China, Xiangqi gradually became popular, and there were small-scale competitions that could not be compared with Go at all, so people should not be very good at playing chess at that time.

But now it's different, now there are almost a lot of people who play chess, even primary school students can play both hands, but there are fewer people who play Go, because Go is more broad and profound, there are not many people who study it, you are like a rural child around us, you say let him play chess, you can definitely play a 456 for you, but if you want him to play Go, then it will not work. In this contrast, the odds of a modern man winning over an ancient man are very high. Although the ancient people are quite wise, but the Chinese are also not low IQ, but also the ancient wisdom crystallization has been summed up, summed up a set of knowledge exclusive to the modern, so that modern people are easy to absorb, in this contrast, I think the ancient people may not be able to win over the modern people.

Of course, this is not to say that the ancient people did not necessarily have other places like Go now, I think that modern people can't catch up with the ancient people even if they beat the horse. Of course, I'm just expressing my opinion, don't scold me.

Generally average, third in the country. There are very few people who don't know how to play chess, but no matter how good they are, they are also third, because of the first.

The first and second are an old lady and her daughter-in-law in the mountains, who are all immortals.

There are very few people who don't know how to play chess. Go chess can't be played, checkers, military chess, backgammon or something, it's always okay.

Playing chess was very popular in ancient times, and there were many varieties, many of which have now been lost. For example, there is a kind of chess, and people don't know how to play it anymore. Lu You's "Notes on Lao Xue'an" talked about playing chess, saying that some people have researched, "The ancient chess game is like an incense burner".

That is, the chessboard on which you play chess is bulging in the middle. He also quoted two poems to prove it: "It is intended to be a chess game, and the heart is not fair."

This shows that by the time of the Song Dynasty, there were no people who could play chess, and they had only seen it in the literature. Lu You said regretfully: "I hate that his art is not passed on."

Playing chess is to be played with fingers, and the master of playing chess is Cao Pi, Emperor Wen of Wei, who can actually use the corner of his hand towel to whisk out the chess. However, the strong have their own strong hands, outside the mountain Qingshan Building, one day a common people came to see, in front of Cao Pi, bowed his head, and actually used the corner of the turban to pick up the chess pieces. Cao Pi immediately sighed to himself.

It seems that playing chess is not a chess game of intelligence, but a game of skill.

The history of chess is quite long, and it was recorded during the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. However, the earliest chess is not the same as the current one. In the Qing Dynasty Qian Zeng's "Reading Min Qiu Ji", it was said that there was a kind of "Seven Kingdoms Elephant Drama Game", this kind of chess has seven countries - Qin, Zhaoyan, Han, Wei, Qichu, representing the Seven Heroes of the Warring States, and there is a week in the middle, which represents everyone to serve Zhou Tianzi.

It's a pity that it's simply recorded, and there is no way to play, and it has disappeared in time.

During the Kangxi reign of the Qing Dynasty, Xu Lan, a frequent acquaintance, was ordered to go out of the fortress and wrote some poems on the way, including Mongolian chess. He said that the Mongolian chess board has nine lines in length and width, divided into 64 grids, and the red and black sides each have eight pawns, two rooks, two horses, two elephants, one cannon, and one general. When playing chess, it will be placed in the center to the right and the cannon to the center and left; Put the top grid, the chariots and horses are arranged on the left and right; In front, there are pawns.

Modern, of course.

First of all, both chess and Go are games of computing power.

What is computing power?

It is the next move, calculating the next possible move of others in **. And according to the increase in the number of steps and the chaos of the situation, you need to deduce not only one step or two, but more far-reaching three, four or even dozens of steps.

Basically, the good ones in Go are the Olympiad.

Or logic and mathematics are all very well learned. Take a friend of mine who won the third prize in the municipal amateur Go competition, his math score was also above 13 at the beginning, and the reason is that chess has very high requirements for logical reasoning ability in this kind of mental computing project.

Take the good chess games in history, the vast majority of people will be crowned with titles such as "quick thinking" and "astute people".

But modern times are different, modern times have a perfect mathematical system to lay the foundation, the logical thinking of teenagers.

Development has a big impact.

In addition, the rules of the ancient and modern chessboard are multilateral, and now the rules on the chessboard have changed several times. It also includes chess games, chess paths, chess thinking, and the gap problem lies in the error of the ideas of the times.

The bigger reason is that the ancients would certainly win or lose when playing chess, but the most fundamental thing is to cultivate sentiment. This is not like today's professional chess players, where the son wins when he lands and robs the dragon. If we talk about this murderous chess move, the struggle between the ancient chess players and the modern chess players will end with the victory of the current chess players.

After all, from the chess game, the chess road itself has been ahead for a long time, you know, this is not a game that respects the ancients.

Hello chess friends!

Your statement that "the variations of Chinese chess have been exhausted by modern chess players" is not entirely correct.

This statement of yours applies, or basically applies, to the actual endgame formula of Chinese chess. For example, the single car example and the Shi Xiang Quan, the single horse case win the single game, etc., these chess games have become a case win or a set of examples, and it can be said that their variations have been exhausted.

But when it comes to layout, you're very wrong. Take the layout of the screen horse in the middle of the artillery, the first chess game appeared in the first hand screen horse to win the first hand as the first gun, so some people tried to use the back hand screen horse against the first hand as the head gun, the gun side found that the screen horse can achieve a satisfactory layout effect and began to create new moves for the screen horse, so the layout has been developed in this way, so as to promote the continuous update of chess theory.

Good luck with your chess skills!

It can't be exhausted, because half of the changes are meaningless in real combat and cannot be used.

There are several conditions for the average chess player.

1. Good memory Everyone knows that many chess masters can perform blind chess performances, that is because they have a good memory, if you have a good memory, then in the chess game there will be no déjà vu when encountering a familiar situation, because the specific steps are not very clear to remember, the result is self-defeating and defeated. Second, strong arithmetic First of all, it should be explained that strong computing ability is based on good memory, if you lack a good memory, then you are not deep enough to calculate, and you do not have a clear understanding of the situation in your mind. When calculating, it is necessary to calculate the offensive speed first, and then calculate the defensive defects, and at the same time take into account the loss of the winning piece, the loss of the winning position, the discarding of the momentum, the discarding of the first and the gain and loss of the redemption.

3. Poor memory and arithmetic If your memory and arithmetic ability are relatively poor, there is only one way, which is to repeatedly dismantle every layout and every change, and practice makes perfect will be kept in mind. Fourth, to have a special layout After everyone is proficient in various layouts, they should choose their best layouts to strengthen, repeatedly figure out the old and new moves, and add their own innovative moves, as their own killer or watchful treasure in the key game. Here's how:

Master 1-2 pre-emptive layouts and strengthen 1-2 rear-hand layouts. Fifth, the rational use of chess software now chess software is widely used, many people are accustomed to using chess software to carry out layout research, but there is often such a situation, in the same layout, although you have memorized the method, but once others do not follow the number of moves of the software, they will not be able to play. This situation indicates that you do not have a deep understanding of the way the software works, and you have not figured out why it is.

In particular, it is necessary to use the analysis mode of the software reasonably, if you use it for a long time, it will hinder the improvement of your chess thinking. 6. Stable mentality Playing chess is the most taboo and impetuous, and you must have a peaceful mentality, so that you can play your best, expand your advantages in the advantages, and reverse the defeat in the disadvantages. It is not a phenomenon that a good chess player should have, as soon as he has an advantage, he must not be idle in his tongue, and once he is at a disadvantage, he will be discouraged and have no fighting spirit.

In addition, when you meet a chess player who is stronger than yourself, you should learn with an open mind, and when you meet a chess player who is weaker than yourself, you should also be humble and polite, and you should not be like a person who plays chess on the street, as soon as you meet, "you can't do it", "look at your level stinks", etc., and even if you don't agree with your words, you should take precautions.

It seems that Li Qingzhao and Wen Tianxiang are very good at chess.

The chess edicts of the Tang Dynasty included Wang Jixin during Tang Xuanzong, Wang Shuwen during Tang Dezong, Wang Yi during Tang Jingzong, Gu Shiyan during Tang Xuanzong and Slip Energy during Tang Xizong, all of which were Go national players at that time.

In the Song Dynasty, for example, Jia Xuan during the Song Taizong, Liu Zhongfu during the Song Zhezong, and Li Yimin during the Song Huizong were all called to be edicted because they played Go very high.

Li Qingzhao, a famous poet of the Southern Song Dynasty, was very proficient in chess. At the end of the Southern Song Dynasty, Wen Tianxiang and his four comrades-in-arms and chess friends: Zhou Zishan, Xiao Gengshan, Liu Zhu, and Liu Cheng, were all very skilled in chess.

Story 1: In ancient times, there was a big player, no one in his eyes regarded himself as the only one in chess, once lived in a hotel, listened to the conversation between the mother-in-law and daughter-in-law living next door, said that the long time of the summer night was difficult to pass, so he played blind chess, listened, the game was exquisite, he thought that he was far from his mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, and left the next day with shame, and never dared to see no one again.

Story 2: In an ancient temple, there lived an old monk. Chess skills are strong, and he has always used nails to set his generals to play chess with others, saying that whoever can move the generals will win, and the legendary old monk has never lost.

Story 3: An old man in ancient times opened a restaurant, and in order to attract business, he asked people to write couplets and hang them in front of the door, to the effect that "the east will let the horse, and the west will let the cannon!"

The winner can eat whatever you want, stay as long as you want, all for free.

I don't have much research on chess, I just know how to move. It feels like this kind of culture is similar to Peking Opera or something, very jerky, it is difficult to become famous or successful, and it is far from fame and fortune, maybe this is the reason, I think the traditional and ancient culture will not be lost, just like the computer replaces the abacus, and it is displayed in a faster and better mode.

Chess is a very advanced skill, and if you want to learn chess well, in addition to talent, you must start practicing from an early age. This is different from playing games, it starts with enlightenment, and the front is to manage the boring practice and the pain of failure. Today's young people only like to eat, drink, and play mobile games, and if they don't delve into chess, it is impossible to learn.

If you want to learn chess, you must practice hard every day, and now people want to win and are afraid of losing, and they feel that learning chess is because they have face after winning, so they resolutely do not play with someone after losing two games, and go to find a bad one, which is impossible to improve. In the same way, the master will not play with the lower hand, because the first is boring, and the second is not helpful to his chess strength.

1.Zhu Jinzhen (Ming Dynasty).

Orange in the secret. Author) 2.Xu Zhi (Ming Dynasty).

Appropriate and elegant. Author)

3.Wang Zaiyue (Qing Dynasty).

Plum Spectrum. Author)

4.Zhong Zhen (early Republic of China).

One of the "Three Phoenixes in Eastern Guangdong".

5.Zhou Deyu.

Early Republic of China) Seven Provinces Chess King).

6.Dong Wenyuan.

Go Chess - Double Gunman.

7.Yang Guanxuan.

8.Hu Ronghua.

9.Lü Chin. 10.Xu Yinchuan.

There are too many skills in Chinese chess, how can you count them?

The opening game is usually for Red to play the middle cannon, then Black to play the screen knight, and then both players play straight, and the game is played.

There are a lot of tricks in the middle game, and I've tried to draw cars, hindsight, stuffy palaces, and kill soldiers, and I'm good at everything. I can't say this, I can understand it by going to the online QQ for a few more rounds.

Endgame?,It's too artistic.,Often down to the endgame where there is only one rook left on both sides or it becomes a car-free battle.,The two sides use horse artillery pawns as the main force to attack and kill each other.。 It is recommended that LZ take a look at "Xiangqi Sanzijing" and "Xiangqi Midgame Attack and Killing Skills".