What are some of the rivals in history?

Thinking of this, the first thing that comes to my mind is Zhuge Liang and Zhou Yu.

Both Shengyu and He Shengliang. This sentence was Zhou Yu's biggest sigh before he died.

Zhou Yu and Zhuge Liang can be said to be evenly matched, both of them are hopelessly smart, but when they meet on a narrow road, the brave wins, and Zhuge Liang is often a step above him.

If two people serve the same master, then this master will definitely win the world in the end, but these two people have different positions and different beliefs. So much so that many-for-tat confrontations.

I believe that no matter whether you have read history or not, you have heard the story of borrowing arrows from a grass boat, originally Zhou Yu wanted to use the matter of borrowing arrows to hit Zhuge Liang, so that Zhuge Liang was dealt with by military law, but unexpectedly, Zhuge Liang's one of the grass boats borrowed arrows to achieve a good story through the ages.

Another pair of fatalistic opponents is Liu Bang and Xiang Yu, Liu Bang and Xiang Yu are good brothers, Xiang Yu is a ghost in troubled times, and Liu Bang is a hero in troubled times.

These two people should be regarded as very famous opponents, and the Hongmen Banquet is the most famous story of Liu Bang and Xiang Yu.

Fan Zeng wanted to get rid of Liu Bang at the Hongmen banquet, but Xiang Yu was a person who had no heart and no city and no righteousness, so he was persuaded by Liu Bang and Zhang Liang in a few words, and with the help of Uncle Xiang, Fan Zeng's plan fell through.

In fact, it is not an exaggeration to say that Liu Bang is a villain, if it weren't for Liu Bang's willingness to be a villain in the future, but Xiang Yu was unwilling to become a villain, I think the world might be Xiang Yu.

Liu Bei and Cao Cao are definitely a pair of evenly matched opponents. In fact, Liu Bei is not as smart as Cao Cao, but Liu Bei is good at employing people and winning people's hearts, resulting in many capable people who are willing to be driven by Liu Bei, and Cao Cao is a character who cares about the world and is ruthless, and would rather I bear the people of the world than the people of the world bear me. I think the sentence that would rather kill three thousand by mistake than let one go, and it couldn't be more appropriate to use on him.

As soon as two people meet, you fight for me for many years, and in the end, no one wins for you, and no one loses for me. So that his descendants, in fact, Cao Pi is not very smart, but Adou really can't help him, so the key to the two of them is to decide who gave birth to a good son.

In the end, Cao Pi defeated Adou, who couldn't be helped.

In history, there have been many historical figures and heroes, and they seem to have a thread of fate that holds them together. Their abilities are outstanding, and they can only be eternal opponents. So what are the fatalistic opponents in history?

First of all, we will think of the Yellow Emperor and Chiyou, the leader of the ancient Chinese tribal alliance and the co-ruler of the Chinese nation in ancient China. The head of the Five Emperors. It is revered as the "first ancestor of humanity" in China.

His outstanding abilities allowed him to rule the tribe. Chiyou is a tribal leader in Chinese mythology and legend, who showed strong strength in the battle against the Yellow Emperor and is one of the ancestors of the Miao people. At that time, due to the needs of the development of the tribe, there was a conflict in the development of the tribe where the two belonged.

In mythology, Chi You is extremely brave, and the Yellow Emperor is invincible, so he can only invite the gods to defeat him. Later, in the battle of Zhuolu, Chiyou was killed. Ended their fateful battle.

In history, Liu Bang and Xiang Yu are also a pair of fateful opponents. When Xiang Yu rebelled in Daze Township, his uncle Xiang Liang rose rapidly after killing the county guard in Huiji County and raised troops against Qin. After the fall of the Qin State, he proclaimed himself the overlord of Western Chu and competed with Liu Bang for the world.

Liu Bang responded to the uprising of 3,000 children after the uprising in Daze Township, captured Pei County, and called himself Pei Gong. After the fall of the Qin Dynasty, he competed with Xiang Yu for the world, and was good at taking advantage of Xiang Yu's arrogant weakness to keep himself invincible. He is good at appointing sages and giving advice for himself.

In the end, he won the battle of Qixia, forced Xiang Yu Wujiang to kill himself, and finally won the world.

Zhuge Liang and Sima Yi are also opponents in history. Zhuge Liang, at Liu Bei's sincere invitation, decided to go out of the mountain to help Liu Bei seize the power of the world. In Longzhong, Liu Bei analyzed the overall situation of the world.

After leaving the mountain, he helped Liu Bei stabilize the overall situation, and offered several strategies to disintegrate Cao Cao's offensive against Liu Bei and establish the Shu Han regime. After Liu Bei's death, he assisted Liu Chan and made six northern expeditions to the Central Plains, and finally became ill and died of illness in Wuzhang Plain. Sima Yi was an outstanding politician, military strategist, and strategist during the Three Kingdoms period, and the founder of the Western Jin Dynasty.

Many times the Wei State made suggestions and resisted Zhuge Liang's Northern Expedition and expedition to pacify Liaodong. When Zhuge Liang died of illness in Wuzhangyuan, it ended the fateful battle between them.

I know that there are these pairs of people who are truly not brave people in history. Sun Bin vs. Pang Juan, Sun Bin wins. Bai Qi against Lian Po, tie.

Li Mu vs. Wang Qian, Wang Jian wins. Zhou Yu vs. Cao Cao, Zhou Yu wins. Zhou Yu against Zhuge Liang, Zhuge Liang, Zhuge Liang won (mainly to win Jingzhou, and win Zhou Yu in strategy).

Zhuge Liang vs. Sima Yi, Zhuge Liang won (Sima Yi did not defeat Zhuge Liang in history). Deng Ai vs. Jiang Wei, Deng Ai wins.

The above are the opponents I know of who are not brave opponents, among which Bai Qi, Zhuge Liang, and Deng Ai are outstanding military strategists. Sun Bin, Lian Po, and Sima Yi are military strategists. Zhou Yu, Jiang Wei, Li Mu, and Wang Jian are famous generals in the world.

Wu Wangfucha and Yue Wang Goujian.

Pang Juan and Sun Bin.

It's Jiemo 666

Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang are chess opponents, and natural enemies are bosom friends, after Zhuge Liang died, Sima Yi said, you are dead, what should I do, I am lonely.

Of course, it's Hooke and Newton, the two physics gurus.

I won't go into details about who Newton was.

Hooke: Born in 1635, he was actually a naturalist who made achievements in optics, biology, mechanics, astronomy, and even urban architectural design, proposing Hooke's law, the fundamental law of elasticity, the inverse square relationship of gravitation, designing and manufacturing vacuum pumps, microscopes, and telescopes, discovering cells, and observing the rotation of Mars for the first time, as well as Jupiter's Great Red Spot, lunar craters, and binary star systems.

Hooke was Newton's predecessor, and the controversy between Hooke and Newton originated from optics, and in 1672, when Newton explained the dispersion of white light as the mixing and separation of particles of different colors, it was sharply criticized by Hooke, who advocated the theory of light waves, and Newton's "Optics" was published only after Hooke's death.

But the real big dispute between Hooke and Newton began with the problem of the law of gravitation in 1674 and 1679 when the two of them corresponded to discuss the circular motion of objects, and Hooke wrote to Newton to explain his idea of the inverse square law that he had since 1660, but from which he could not deduce Kepler's law of planetary motion. In January 1684, Hooke claimed in a conversation with Newton and Wren that he had completed the derivation, but Harley and Wren did not believe it, and Halley then told Newton. Newton said that he had already made a derivation in his book Principia Mathematica of Natural Philosophy, which Halley subsequently led to its publication, which led Hooke to suspect that Newton had plagiarized his work, and was reluctant to make any of his discoveries public.

As a result, Newton removed all statements from the manuscript that quoted Hooke's work.

Hooke did not leave a portrait, which is suspected to have been taken down by the Royal Society after his death under the influence of Newton. Newton also tried to burn a large number of Hooke's manuscripts and articles, but was prevented. Hooker is known as the Leonardo da Vinci of London, and in the end he did not even leave a portrait of him, which has become a point that historians are looking for, and I have to say that Newton is really black!

There are too many rivals in history.

Rivals, in fact, there have been several in the past.

It should be those despicable people who rewrite history.

It should be the physicists and mathematicians.