-
Anonymous users2024-02-10The W170 wide-angle end is equivalent to 28mm W150, the wide-angle end is equivalent to 30mm, W170, 1000W pixels, and W150 800W pixels.
W170 5x photovolity W150 3x photovolatility.
W170 is 150 more expensive than 120 pieces.
W170 two colors W150 four colors.
Everything else is the same.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-09DSC-W170 Sensor Size: 1 (.)
Total pixels (10,000): Approximately 10.3 million pixels.
Effective pixels (10,000): Approximately 10.1 million pixels.
Focal length f=(35mm equivalent): 5-25mm(28-140mm) DSC-W150 digital camera.
Sensor size: 1" (
Total pixels (10,000): Approximately 8.3 million pixels.
Effective pixels (10,000): Approximately 8.1 million pixels.
Focal length f=(35mm equivalent): 5-25mm(30-150mm)The others are not much different.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-08In fact, the settings inside are all the same, and there is no difference.
It's just that if you have a wide angle, it's a lot more expensive, but in fact, 500w of pixels can meet the general needs.
I think it depends on which one I prefer, I prefer 170.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-07**, wide angle, pixels, w170 are relatively high.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-06Personal advice and opinions for your reference:
On the Olympus FE3000, Sony W150, and W170 models, the CCD size of the photoreceptor chip, the most important imaging device, is almost the same, all of which are about 1 inch, and there is no major substantive difference in the actual imaging effect, which is basically the same type and grade model.
Olympus FE3000, Sony W150, and W170 are card players with telescopic lenses, and the imaging effect is slightly better than those with periscope lenses.
Olympus FE3000, Sony W150, W170 are fully automatic cameras, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, can only be pre-staged in the camera to cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, in poor light conditions, especially when shooting night scenes, the imaging effect will not be ideal, but the general home can be completely competent.
In terms of comprehensive performance, Sony W170 is better, mainly with a wide angle of 28mm, and Sony W150 is higher in cost performance.
The biggest disadvantage of Olympus FE3000 is that it does not have a practical and effective optical image stabilization function, and in poor light, especially in night shooting, handheld shooting is very easy due to the slight shake of the camera, resulting in blurry images, and there will be many limitations in actual use.
Buying a camera is the same as buying a computer, what suits you is the best, you can compare them according to your own price and preferences, and check the information on the Internet.
At home, 170 is enough. The five-fold light change of 170 is more practical. 10 million pixels is also enough for the average person. The 28mm wide angle is also more practical. >>>More
I'm a super mentally retarded - manager level 4 hero, and the source must be given for citing the answer, otherwise there is a suspicion of plagiarism. >>>More
Sony cameras are really not very good.
Consumer digital cameras have their own merits, the mainstream Nikon, Canon, the old brands are Fujifilm, Olympus, Pentax, Sony, Samsung should be rookies, everyone has their own characteristics in their respective fields, Nikon, Canon, Fuji good quality, manual functions, Sony fashion and lovely, consumers can choose products according to their own needs, after all, the most suitable for themselves is not necessarily the most expensive, often the most important factor. >>>More
Although I am using T300 now, I still strongly recommend you to use W300, because, T300 battery time is not very long, because the screen is too big, and the recorded ** is sometimes difficult to find in the machine, and it can only be seen in the computer folder, depressed!! What's more important is that the W300 is a telescopic lens, with a wide angle, which is cool to shoot the scenery! And the T300 is a periscope, you can imagine for yourself which one has better image quality! >>>More
Personal suggestions and opinions for your reference: Sony W210, W220, Canon Ixus IS, Canon A2000IS models, the most important imaging device photoreceptor chip CCD size is almost the same, are about 1 inch, although some have millions of pixels improved, the actual imaging effect does not have any major substantive differences, basically the same type, the same grade model. Sony W210, W220, Canon Ixus IS, Canon A2000is are all fully automatic cameras, in actual shooting, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, can only be pre-staged in the camera to cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, especially in the case of poor light, especially when shooting night scenes, the imaging effect will not be very ideal, but the general home can be fully competent. >>>More