Which is better?

Colloa OA for binary software works great.

Look at what needs each has its own focus.

OA's words should be okay.

It mainly depends on how detailed you need to be.

I think the future development direction of OA is mobile office and cloud. From this point of view, Panwein's mobile office is very mature and in-depth, and the three products are also cloud-based, as well as a SaaS product. The latter two manufacturers started late in this regard, each with its own strengths, one is the channel is king, and the other is positioned as KMS, a knowledge management platform.

Now OA is a bit outdated, and large companies in first-tier cities are changing netlist platforms, and OA is generally not used for new applications. Weaker functionality than netlists.

The Rubik's Cube netlist has a long history, the product is powerful, the quality is stable, and there are a large number of systems with a stable operation time of more than 5 years.

The Rubik's Cube netlist is compatible with Excel, which can be used directly as a template for the interactive interface, and the background business write-back formula is also compatible with the excel formula, with low learning cost and rich information.

The functional modules of the Rubik's Cube netlist are rich and powerful, and it is not just a form application, but a new species.

Because the Rubik's Cube netlist is a qualitative change, unlike a low one, which is just a quantitative change. Moreover, the Mosaic netlist is based on the BS architecture, based on the SOA microservice architecture. The history of the Rubik's Cube netlist is relatively long, and it is powerful and can ensure stable quality and superior performance, unlike some new products, there are too many bugs.

The Rubik's Cube netlist has very strong integration capabilities, can adapt to complex IT environments, and can expand the old system and give the previous system a new lease of life. The Rubik's Cube netlist is cost-effective, for small and medium-sized enterprises, there is a first-class version, and the function is not weak, it is recommended that small and medium-sized enterprises must seize the benefits of high-end products at a low price.

Therefore, Huawei process IT, GTS, ** Chain, Dutch representative office, etc., many departments and overseas representative offices are using the Rubik's Cube netlist, as well as Xiaomi, Chinese Life, Shanghai Stock Exchange, Shanghai Commercial Aircraft C919 domestic large passenger aircraft known as China's Boeing production management also use the Rubik's Cube netlist.

There are also Shandong Inspur Group, Langjiu, as well as Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding, Shenhua Group, CRRC, and Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant, China's largest nuclear power base, all using the Rubik's Cube network.

Choose Lanling, DingTalk can also be, depending on your needs, if you are a small enterprise, there are cost considerations, you can use Lanling EIS, if it is a large and medium-sized organization, use ekp, not to mention the complete functions, the architecture is leading in the industry, follow-up expansion, performance improvement is also convenient, Fanwei heard that there are too many pits, many friends are deeply affected, hehe.

Every product will have shortcomings, just like people, no one is perfect. We should understand what we are concerned about, what are your goals, what are your needs, and what problems do you want to solve? Then you can understand how Panwein solves these problems, personal opinion, if it is a standard product, it can meet many of your needs;

However, if you want to customize some products, you need to find a professional rapid customization company, such as Panwei V standard products, which are suitable for users. However, if there is customization, it will take a lot of money to adjust to suit the customer, compared with some customized software for rapid development platform configuration, such as Tianling project OA, we need to do the corresponding configuration, need to adjust the requirements, and it can also be configured. The project OA gives some special content to facilitate the management of the enterprise.

Lan Ling is a little better, from the following three aspects:

Professional: 20 years of deep cultivation in the field of OA and knowledge management, leading intellectual property rights in the mobile and intelligent market, the main participant in the compilation of the "National Standard for Knowledge Management", one of the organizers of the MIKE Award, and more than 100 scientific research achievements and patents.

Word-of-mouth: Top 500 and top 100 enterprises in the industry recognize the brand, 50% of customers who have used Lanling products for more than 5 years, 30% of customers who have cooperated for more than 5 phases, and tens of thousands of medium and large customers are the first choice for cooperation.

Innovation: More than 100 scientific research achievements and patents, co-created with top 500 and industry leading enterprises, and more than 10 universities such as Tsinghua University to build innovation laboratories, knowledge management engineer authoritative training units.

Lanling is also a leader in ecological OA, a professional service provider for digital work, and a national standard-setting unit for knowledge management, providing enterprises and organizations with integrated solutions such as smart office, mobile portal, knowledge management, process management, cost control, and information innovation office. It has helped tens of thousands of enterprises such as CITIC, Vanke, Xiaomi, and P&G to realize the work transformation of smart management and efficient office, which is more recommended.

Like Pan Micro, Zhiyuan, UF, Jin He, Lanling are all big brands, there are a lot of them on the market, digital pass is a new brand, today's goal is free, the function is relatively not as many as other charging brands, in fact, I personally feel that this OA software is basically really the same, the only thing that can be compared is the service and brand.

As far as Lanling OA is concerned, its knowledge management is relatively well-known, and the main large platform OA products are mainly large and medium-sized enterprises. Because customers are mainly large enterprises, this is relatively high for OA personalized customization, and the basic requirements can be secondary development, this is the strategic vision of large enterprises (because they are worried that you Lan Ling can live longer than me is still a problem), a set of OA with 5 to 10 years. Lanling OA is a good way to meet these requirements, thanks to Lanling's deep understanding of the OA needs of large group enterprises, it is said that Lanling has a very high market share in OA large customers, and among China's top 500 enterprises, Lanling's customers account for more than one-third.

The former owner used Fanwei, I heard that it was very expensive, and it often had to be updated, and the browser version was incompatible if it was slightly higher; I haven't used Lan Ling, I don't know; But they are all industry brands, and they are definitely not low.

If your company does secondary development, don't use the micro, the software architecture of the micrometer system is very poor, there is almost no **, there is no framework for the front and back ends, at least until ecology8, the ** written by the micro is the worst I have ever seen, a jsp page contains sql, business logic, js, html, not even the basic mvc architecture...

Each product has its own benefits, and the main functions of Panwei OA are large and wide, and he has all the functions in the OA field. Lanling OA focuses on smart office and integrates their main product knowledge management system in it.

However, at present, many enterprises have changed their personalized functions very much, and at present, Tianling OA can realize functional customization according to the needs of enterprises.

Lanling and Fanwei are in Guangdong and Shanghai, and their businesses are mostly the same.

Compared with Fanwei, Lan Lingsheng is in knowledge management.

There are too many OA pits in Panwei, especially when it is to be expanded later.

Large enterprises choose Lanling OA, and small enterprises use Pan Micro OA.

You should choose the OA system that suits you according to your own needs, considering the differences in the industry and the size of the staff. As an OA administrator in the company, I have been in contact with these two OA manufacturers, and in summary, I can choose Fanwei if I tend to productize, and I recommend choosing Lanling if my company has development capabilities and has a large number of personalized development needs.

Lanling is a project, and Panwei is a product. Lanling's advantage is that it can do a single customer deeply and thoroughly, and the disadvantage is that the capacity bottleneck is obvious; The advantage of Panwei is that it has the ability to do a lot of customers, but a single customer is not deep enough and not thorough.

The historical choice of different technologies and product paths brings different capacity flexibility. What is "capacity" in the heavy-duty OA industry? It's people, it's the ability to deliver.

Today, mobility brings about the concentrated release of OA demand, and because Lanling is taking a highly customized route, it is "more than enough but not enough" to expand production capacity. Through the Lego building block product concept, product modularization and componentization, Fanwei has found a good balance between customization and standardization, and a high degree of product standardization can reduce the difficulty of implementation and reduce the delivery threshold.

Lan Ling OA is likely to be a **, and he owes me money and doesn't give it. It's best not to cooperate with Lanling OA, the service is extremely poor. **Firm.

Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, for example, Lanling's advantages are as follows:

Lanling OA has been committed to the platformization of OA, the platformization of OA software is reflected in the design of system architecture and underlying technology, and the mobile OA is reflected in the mobile application level. The design and architecture of OA software can be complex, flexible and advanced, while the mobile terminal needs to be more and more efficient and convenient, the back-end of mobile OA also needs to process business logic, and the accumulated technology can be directly applied to the mobile terminal, which is inseparable from the support of the platform.

On the basis of years of collaborative office accumulation, Lanling OA has realized the unification and perfect integration of mobile and platform, and better expanded the application of OA collaborative office on the mobile terminal. It has obvious advantages in the implementation and service of Lanling OA in the industry, and can better meet the diverse and different needs of users.

Leading customer service quality: 200+ cities across the country, more than 300 teams, customer service engineers provide 24-hour personal service, 10 major professional services, 3 major platforms are quickly reached, and 100+ customer thank you letters are received every year.

To put it simply, Lan Ling hasn't used it, it's not clear, but Fanwei, who knows who uses the garbage, it's expensive to death, just entered the pit.

You can choose anything, but don't choose micro, unless you want to be pitted.

Whether it is good or not is mainly to see whether it can meet the needs of the enterprise, and the evaluation of "good" is to look at the comprehensive.

When choosing OA office software, you should pay attention to the following questions:

Business needs: Identifying your business needs is the primary consideration when choosing OA office software. Understand your business processes, how your teams collaborate, document management needs, and more so you can choose the right software solution.

Features and modules: Review the features and modules of OA office software to ensure that it meets your business needs. Consider whether you need tasks management, scheduling, document collaboration, approval processes, report analysis, etc., and compare them with the features provided by the software.

User-friendliness: Choosing an easy-to-use and easy-to-use OA office software is important to increase employee productivity and acceptance. Whenever possible, choose software with a clean interface and smooth operation, and consider whether training and technical support are available.

Customizability: Consider the customizability of the software to fit the specific needs and processes of your business. Some software offers custom development and configuration options that can be personalized to your requirements.

Data security and privacy protection: Data security is a key issue, ensuring that OA office software has a strong data encryption and access control mechanism. Learn about the software provider's data security measures, such as data backup, recovery, rights management, and more.

Scalability and integration: Consider the scalability and integration of OA office software to meet the development needs of enterprises in the future. Choose software with open APIs that support third-party application integration, so that it can seamlessly connect with other systems.

Reputation and support: Choose a reputable and experienced software vendor. Check customer reviews and service support to ensure that you can get technical support and upgrades in a timely manner.

Cost-effectiveness: Finally, consider the cost-effectiveness of OA office software. Evaluate the software's licensing, maintenance, training, and more, and weigh the balance between the software's functionality and performance and cost.

In summary, by considering factors such as business needs, functions and modules, user-friendliness, data security, scalability, business credibility and cost-effectiveness, it can help you choose the right OA office software.

Hope it helps you :)

For Lanling, it has 18 years of deep foundation and experience in the field of digital OA office, and has accumulated a lot of practical experience in the process of serving a series of large enterprises such as China Merchants Bank, PICC, Huawei, and Tencent. DingTalk is born in the entire ecosystem of Alibaba, and has many advantageous resources, and through continuous cultivation in recent years, it has a strong group of more than 200 million users and 10 million enterprise organizations.

On the one hand, the integration of Lanling and DingTalk stems from the consistency of corporate philosophy and strategy, and more importantly, for the concept of future development, that is, the consistency of the dimension of building a future organization we mentioned above, the strong technical genes of the two companies coupled with this Bidong An enterprise ecological environment that embraces future opportunities, empowering the business development of users in all walks of life, so how can Lanling Senku and DingTalk not have a good future?