Fish I want it 20, who knows what fish I want to also paragraph 1

You can have both fish and bear's paws, and there should be innovative ideas

The first paragraph of "Fish I Want".The original textAs follows

Fish, I want too; Bear's paws, as well as I want. You can't have both, and you can't have both, and those who give up the fish and take the bear's paw are also. Life, also what I want; Righteousness is also what I want.

You can't have both, and those who sacrifice their lives to take righteousness are also. Life is also what I want, and what I want is more than the living, so I don't want to get it; Death is also evil to me, and evil is worse than the dead, so I have no way to get rid of it.

If a man is made to do more than to live, then why should he not use him who can live? If there is no worse thing for a man than for the dead, why not do anything that can be done to cure the sick? From what is, there is no need to be born, and from what is, there can be troubles and there are not actions.

Therefore they desire more than the living, and evil more than the dead. Those who are not only virtuous and quiet have a heart, everyone has it, and the sage can not lose his ears.

What is "Fish I Want".

Fish I Want" is from "Mencius: Gaozi I", and the author is likely to be Mencius.

"Fish I Want" is a representative work of Mencius based on his theory of sexual goodness, and an in-depth discussion of man's view of life and death. Emphasizing that "justice" is more important than "life", he advocates sacrificing one's life for righteousness.

Mencius said, "The heart of shame is righteousness," and he said, "Righteousness," and the way is also. ......Only a gentleman can follow the way". Mencius thinks that he is ashamed of doing bad things, and others are disgusted by doing bad things, which is righteousness; Righteousness is the right path that a moral gentleman must follow.

Mencius first used an analogy with the specific things that people are familiar with in life: fish is what I want, and bear's paw is also what I want, and in the case that the two cannot be obtained at the same time, I would rather give up the fish and have the bear's paw; Life is what I cherish, and righteousness is also what I cherish, and in the case that the two cannot be obtained at the same time, I would rather give up my life in favor of righteousness.

Mencius compared life to a fish and righteousness to a bear's paw, believing that righteousness is more precious than life just as a bear's paw is more precious than a fish, which naturally leads to the proposition of "sacrificing life for righteousness". The proposition of Lu Nian is the argument of Zhongqi Zhen in the whole article.

Fish Core Town, I can do what I want; Bear's paws, as well as I want. You can't have both, and you can't have both, and those who give up the fish and take the bear's paw are also. Life, also I want to change the rough, righteousness, also what I want; You can't have both, and those who sacrifice their lives to take righteousness are also.

The life is also what I want, and what I want is more than the living, so it is not for (wéi) 苟 (gǒu) to get also; Death is also my evil (wù), and the evil (wù) is worse than the dead, so there is no way to dispel (bì). If a man is made to do more than to live, then why should he not use him who can live? If there is no worse evil than the dead, then if there is no way to dispel the sick, why not be the sick?

From yes is born and there is no use, and from yes can be rid of (bì) suffering and there is not for (wéi) also. Therefore there is more desire than the living, and evil (wù) is greater than that of the dead. Not only the sage has a heart, everyone has it, and the sage can not lose his ears.