Solving! Which is more cost effective D90 or KX, the expert will advise

Satisfactory answer enthusiastic to ask friends 2010-04-05Pentax is the best workmanship in Japanese products Durability considerations are naturally her K-X uses the same CMOS as D90, but after software optimization, it is better than Nikon D90 (I don't know the above friend data**) And cheaper**In exchange for a little lack of focusing ability (if you rarely shoot on stage, this deficiency can be completely ignored) It is definitely worth it Pentax's expansion ability will not be weaker than any brand Pentax's prime lens is better than the other two Pentax has a unique imaging style Pentax star head will not be weaker than Canon L If you insist on saying that Pentax's product line is relatively weak, it is because he has not designed several price products for the same focal length lens Follow-up question: I like Binder's imaging style very much, but Binde cameras are not easy to buy, and I heard that the KX is small, so I don't worry about online shopping ......I don't know which city you're in, check it on the Internet, there should still be a point of sale, although the K-X is smaller than the average SLR, but it is only relatively If you try it, you will never feel uncomfortable to hold Follow-up: Is it better to choose a double head cover or a single head cover for KX?

Seven thousand words can only start KX, and you have indicated that it is cost-effective, that is, cost-effective, then KX is undoubtedly D90 stand-alone 5900 yuan, unless it is equipped with 50, do not package can almost be controlled within 7000 KX is now only 5000 double-head set machine, although the performance is definitely not comparable with D90, but you get what you pay for.

I am from family C, and I also have the machine of family N, there is no problem of prejudice in the family, and I have never used the machine of family P. Therefore, just to say a little feeling, it can only be used as a reference, not a suggestion.

Comparing the ** of n and p, relatively speaking, the n is more realistic, and p is a little too much, like an oil painting but not like **. From a photographic point of view, if you see too much of it, it will be a little greasy, and it will be annoying in the later stage. Portraits, or Canon is better.

Of course, adjusting the sharpness, contrast, and saturation can also tilt a little to the other party's style, but P is really not suitable for portraits, too much.

**The sense of flatness is too strong, there are many reasons, aperture, focal length, object distance, etc., which have nothing to do with the brand of the machine.

I don't know exactly what the problem with focusing red dots you are talking about.

These two machines are not of the same grade, the K-X is the entry, and the D90 is the mid-range K-7 and D90 are in the same grade.

If you continue to prepare to burn money in the future, start with the mid-range.

Buy D7000 at the beginning of November

Pentax hasn't used it, only the D90 and D5000 and the 550D friend has a K-7

PS: Must have a shoulder screen.

Dear landlord, you have reached this level, why do you still have to consider KX, this grade is too low. Let's pass it directly.

D90 (shooting), it is recommended that you buy a single machine, 18-55 is not of much use to a professional person like you. It's still equipped with a fixed focus, a short focus, and a telephoto. Then match the lens according to your needs.

Maybe the first-line lens is too expensive, and it is a little unsuitable for the D90.

So I suggest you consider a second-line lens, Tamron or Sigma, I think it's quite suitable.

At the same level, it is recommended that you consider 550d (shooting people).

If you want to move to a higher level, then consider 50d, which is too different from D90 550d. The effect is very noticeable.

If the landlord doesn't understand anything, you can ask me.

D90 Old machine

Brother,As a novice,I think first play a good set of lenses,And then think about anything else,Portrait productionD90 is slightly better,Strong sense of layering

I started with a 550d and it felt good.

Now that LZ has started to discuss German flavor, why don't you consider Leica M9? It's just entertainment.

The head of Pentax can have fun is the three princesses, and the portrait is only 77. Pentax's strength is humanities, and its personalization is also customized for this, so if your focus is not humanities, you should consider other companies. There is also a German taste** is the lens after all, if it is the credit of the fuselage, in addition to high sensitivity and high pixels, it can be solved with PS.

If the burning head is rather lacking than excessive, then D90 with 18105 is not suitable, because 18105 is a head that is destined to be eliminated, not as good as 1685 or 1755, and not much better than 1870 except for a number of VR that is not very interesting (personal opinion, how can you not practice iron hands when playing SLR, how can you not have a tripod). Since you would rather lack than abuse, it is better to add a fixed focus to D90, such as 35 2 and the like, and then go to the portrait of 8514, 1352DC, and so on.

In terms of portraits, N's 8514 and 1352DC are worth doing,In addition, the lamp system of the N family should also be paid attention to,Sitting on 800900Two magic lamps are not negligible in portraits。 There are also 3014 and 5014 of S, which are good side plant options.

There is also a comrade of the 0.5 yuan file of the 5LC family, LZ didn't ask the C family, you are dedicated to 4L to study. I'm not C black, I don't object to using C, and I agree that C's has a lot of good things, but it's a bad habit to bargain for C's 0.5 yuan file.

KR is an improved version of KX, and in terms of image quality, there is no difference between the two.

The KR has a few minor improvements over the KX: the red dot indicator in the viewfinder, a much higher LCD resolution, the addition of a dedicated focus assist light, and an increase in the processor along with a slight increase in the continuous shooting speed, focusing speed, and maximum sensitivity. In addition, the way of changing the focus point has changed slightly, and the skin has also changed a little.

Overall, the improvement in performance and handling is noticeable, and there are no significant drawbacks. But the image quality still hasn't changed much, in fact, it's normal that the image quality hasn't changed, and the image quality of the KX won't lose to any APS-C SLR camera.

If that's not a problem for you, go for kr. Although the cost performance is slightly lower than that of KX, the performance is still very high, and it is a strong machine in the entry-level SLR.

By the way, Pentax and Sony are not worse than Canon Nikon at all, and the cost performance is even a little higher, and for more than 99% of players, Pentax Sony's lens group is also very sufficient.

It doesn't matter if you buy a machine for the first time, that is, you can use it for practice, there won't be a lot of films, just find a cheap one, and when you have a certain foundation, you can choose it without asking others.

Buy Nikon and Canon for SLR, don't think about the rest!

Canon 550D, Nikon D5000 can all go and find out.

That says Nikon D5000 Canon 550D, you really don't understand.

D5000 is prone to problems, Nikon's official website says that although it can be corrected, can you guarantee that there will be no problems in the future?

550D,The picture quality is better in the studio and the light is better during the day,At night, it's not as good as 500D,More noise,The image sensor of this machine is the same as 500D,The system is up,500D is very good at home。

KR and KX In my opinion, it is the same as Nikon's D90 and Sony's A230, because the image sensor is the same, and in terms of image quality, because the lens is only in the middle of the rules, it is not as good as the D90 under this image sensor, because of the lens.

KR is an upgrade of KX, but the image sensor has not changed, it is not very meaningful, change the door to see the Canon 500D and Nikon D3100, and the multi-talk point is D90

The master can't talk about it, hehe, let me talk about my opinion based on my own experience in using SLR n years.

First of all, it is necessary to confirm whether you really need a DSLR, with the continuous upgrading of digital image sensor technology, in many cases, in fact, a card machine is enough to meet the needs, not everyone needs a DSLR.

Then there is the choice of the brand of SLR, SLR is a very special digital device, the root line is that the SLR lens is not common to everyone, for example, if you choose Nikon, then you can't use Canon lenses, and vice versa. This is also the so-called SLR school problem. Everyone hopes that newcomers can use the same brand of SLR as themselves, so that on the one hand, it is more convenient to communicate with each other, and on the other hand, the old birds can sell lenses easily.

So as you can see, the people who recommend Canon basically use the Canon SLR, and the people who recommend Nikon basically use the Nikon SLR. There is also a special category, which is the Sony SLR (such as me), and they will generally recommend Canon or Nikon to you, hehe. Because if you recommend Sony, it will be despised by CN players.

Let's not talk about that.

Back to the point. The choice of entry brand is more recommended Nikon or Canon, and other brands are suitable for people who have a certain understanding of SLR.

Nikon's strength is:

1.Colorful and suitable for shooting landscapes.

2.Starter lenses** are affordable and of high quality.

3.The quality control is outstanding, and it is almost rare to hear of Nikon having quality problems.

Canon's strength is:

1.Color bias, this is more difficult to understand, but this feature is particularly suitable for portrait shooting, which mm does not want their skin tone pink pink drops.

2.The high-end lenses are of high quality and have a wide range of lenses, but they are not as selective as Nikon in terms of entry. Canon SLR is particularly suitable for high-end people.

Basically, you will notice in the future that Canon players will basically find a way to get a few shots of more than 8000 yuan.

3.There are many users, and everyone will think that Canon is more professional (because the type of photographer that everyone has the most contact with, that is, studio photographers, likes to use Canon, the reason is see Article 1).

Therefore, combined with the above analysis, it is recommended that you consider your own model.

specific model, because you didn't say the price of your psychological investment.

The range is too wide, from 5,000 yuan to 30,000 yuan there are cost-effective models, not recommended,

Nikon D90 mid-range machine, about 6800, is currently cost-effective.

It mainly depends on your budget, SLR, from a set of 3,000 yuan to a lens combination of 50,000 or 60,000 yuan, there are all of them, how to recommend it to you if you don't say the budget.

Of course, the SLR chooses Canon, Canon EOS60D is recommended, and the machine is a good choice for photography enthusiasts, enthusiasts, and travelers I prefer the 60D megapixel resolution rotating LCD screen, the new control dial, and the in-camera RAW processing, creative filters and other functions, these functions are the first time to appear on the EOS series of machines, which can make users more handy, and can improve the flexibility of creation The configuration cost performance is good

1. The set of 550d is about 5200 and 500d is about 4700.

2. Of course, the cost performance is still 500d, and 550d is still in virtual high school.

3. Do you mean that the ** of the lens is at 6000, or is it all together?

4. Go directly to buy, licensed parallel goods are available, the key is that you have to check carefully.

Eyepiece cover DK-5, camera strap, accessory hot shoe cover BS-1, body cover BF-1A......These are all standard and come in a box. In addition to these, the kit generally comes with the original software, battery, sleeve, etc. If you flash outside, novices can't use it, and you only need it if you want to make a theme or involve a supplemental light.

The most basic ones are actually two, a savings card and a camera bag, one is to save **, the other is to save the camera, and the other can be purchased on demand.

Anti-shake, can increase the safety shutter speed by 2-3 stops, the use is average, because the handheld method of the SLR is different from DC, and the stability itself is stronger, and if you need a long shutter, you still have to put on the tripod. In principle, in-body stabilization is better than lens stabilization, because in-body stabilization is more adaptable, and many inexpensive non-stabilization lenses can be used. However, the stabilization of the lens is even better.

These three machines,It's really not recommended,It's too entry-level,If you have to choose, it's A390.,At least Sony's head picture quality is good.,But it's better to add some budget to buy a real "entry machine"。

If you don't want to upgrade the lens, you might as well spend 2000+ to buy a quasi-professional DC, such as S95, LX5.

Anti-shake does not look at the technique and peripherals, of course, it is better to have anti-shake. The lens body image stabilization is just one, almost the same. The set of machines generally has 1-2 entry heads plus the fuselage and basic accessories, and those miscellaneous things are with the machine, and the flashing off light is basically built-in.

Novices go to large stores to buy licensed goods, don't be greedy for small and cheap, and pay attention to the condition and use traces of each component. If you have any questions, please ask customer service in time. There is not much difference in the performance of the entry-level fuselage, so go to the physical store to try the feel and choose for yourself.