Why is there no compulsory education in high schools?

High school does not implement compulsory education, and the funds are not abundant.

The implementation of compulsory education in high schools is the trend of development in the future.

Some cities have implemented compulsory education in high schools

1. Since 2007, Zhuhai has announced that it will take the lead in implementing 12-year free education, with free tuition, books and miscellaneous fees for nine years of compulsory education, and free tuition for high school education. Just that year, Zhuhai ** increased financial subsidies of 100 million yuan for this purpose.

2. Xinzheng City, Henan Province has achieved 12 years of free compulsory education since 2011.

Respect the differences of students and the realistic choices of students, some people go to vocational secondary school, and some people go to high school. Respect the differences of students and the realistic choices of students, some people go to one book, and some people go to two books. Different people have different paths to take!

No.

At present, China has a nine-year compulsory education system. It includes both elementary and junior high schools. High school is not yet compulsory. With the development of the economy and the improvement of the people's living standards, China will also include high school in the scope of compulsory education.

The nine-year compulsory education is from elementary school to junior high school, so its tuition fee is also different from that of technical secondary school, vocational school, technical school, and high school, but I heard that 12 years of compulsory education will be implemented in the future, and it will include high school at that time. China's compulsory education has always been a nine-year system, which has continued for decades, although we have been striving to popularize 12-year compulsory education on the basis, but at present it has not been successfully realized.

Some people really aren't reading material.

Chinese originally have a lot of countries can't afford this money = =

I played a game called City Skyline, which is a simulation game for building and running a city. The rate of return on investment in education is very high, but there is a problem, primary schools can be built more, middle schools can be built appropriately, and universities must not be built more. If too many universities are built, and slowly everyone is a high-level talent, only doing high-end jobs, the factory that plays the late game will be seriously short of people, and the industry will collapse.

Next, the extension of compulsory education and the increase of investment in education mean accelerating the improvement of the national knowledge level, and the national knowledge level is linked to the national industrial structure. Imagine if 12 years of compulsory education had been implemented 12 years ago and the dropout rate had been greatly reduced, who would be responsible for today's farmers, construction workers, and couriers (no discrimination)? There is a calculation of how many jobs require and how many people with academic qualifications.

As of now, the number of college students has increased, and many college students are starting to work in jobs that only require a secondary school education. And the cost of learning and time is not properly paid off, and it can become a less stable social factor.

Therefore, if the growth rate of the national knowledge level exceeds the rate of updating the country's industrial structure, it is not necessarily a good thing for social stability. The industrial structure is like the foundation, and the people's wisdom is the superstructure, and the superstructure that is built faster than the foundation is unstable. Science and technology have been advancing, and the industrial structure has been updated, so sooner or later 12-year compulsory education will be popularized.

Compulsory education is not free education, so why is it proposed to extend compulsory education to reduce the burden on families, many people think that children will go to college when they go to high school, and the burden on the family is not heavier? And as far as our current education model is concerned, learning well means that you must be good in every subject, and you can't have partial subjects, so are the people you want to cultivate?

Mr. Qian Xuesen has been asking why China can't produce great scientists who can pry the earth, why? Because our education model is mass production, everyone can't play to their own strengths, and can only keep tutoring their own weak subjects. Now it is the nine-year brother Hu compulsory education, that is to say, we mass produce to nine years, at this age, teenagers already have their own conscious choices, if they are forced to continue compulsory education, their thinking will be imprisoned, in this case, how to produce great scientists!

Chinese universities are easy to get into, and learning is easy, there are no special exams, and the fourth and sixth levels can be passed by relying on the foundation of high school. Scientists come out from? I only hope that after nine years of compulsory education, students will be given more choices, so that everyone can choose what they like.

It is because the area of our country is too wide, the population is large, the scattered places are very extensive, it cannot be popularized, there are many difficulties, and the economic strength of the Bilunyuan area cannot afford it.

Because high school education is a bit difficult, and high school education requires a certain amount of funding, it is not included in compulsory education.

Because it is still difficult to include high school education in compulsory education, it is not easy to achieve this.