Who is responsible for this traffic accident?

If it is simply as you described, A is not responsible at all, and B should be fully responsible, because B occupied the left lane when turning and driving, so it has nothing to do with A.

Don't think I'm saying this, I have a car like you in an accident, on the city road, there are small saplings in the middle of the road to block the night lights caused by the sight problem, I drive normally on the highway, leaning on the left lane near the sapling, there is a taxi in the U-turn place due to too much bending, resulting in entering my car did not see the other party in time to crash the bumper of the taxi, and then I asked the traffic police to deal with it, the other party due to the turning angle is too large, suddenly from my car's point of view, so no matter how fast I am, the traffic police are solely responsible for the taxi anyway, it's very simple, because he violated the traffic rules when he turned.

Your situation is similar to mine, you two should hit the emergency lights after braking, do not move the vehicle, if there are serious injuries should be sent to the hospital first, if there are no serious injuries, you should call the local traffic police**, let them judge and deal with it. Do not move the scene, otherwise there is no evidence.

If I have to send money, I can use 10% at most, and I don't want to give 10%. If he hadn't driven like this, I wouldn't have been. But if you're really fast ...

1. B turns from B to D, according to road traffic rules, it should drive on the right, should go from B to A to D, or extend the center line to turn right and left, but not directly to D, itself has violated traffic rules;

2. If you are injured in an accident because you avoid another vehicle driving from D to C, B is fully responsible for the premise that the other 2 vehicles do not violate traffic rules;

3. In a humanitarian situation, the owner of the other 2 vehicles should be given appropriate compensation;

B turns and fails to give way to the vehicle going straight, which should be the main responsibility.

However, if it is not known that the road lane division occurs, if it occurs on a motorized road, A driving a non-motorized vehicle on the motorized lane is also secondarily responsible.

In terms of the priority of responsibility, it is actually necessary to negotiate a few openings. A accounts for 20% and 40% are all possible.

A driver of one side shall bear full responsibility for the traffic accident under the following circumstances: (1) The driver drives the vehicle at an intersection controlled by a traffic signal and continues to pass at a red light. (2) The driver drives a motor vehicle over the center line of the road or isolation facilities that are prohibited from crossing, and causes a traffic accident with other vehicles or pedestrians on the road.

3) The driver drives a motor vehicle into a non-motorized lane or a non-motorized vehicle within the traffic range, and scrapes a non-motorized vehicle driving in the same direction. (4) The driver drives a vehicle to scrape a pedestrian on the sidewalk or within the pedestrian traffic range. (5) The driver drives a vehicle and collides with a pedestrian passing in a pedestrian crossing in accordance with the law.

6) The driver driving the vehicle does not avoid the police car, fire truck, ambulance, or engineering rescue vehicle performing emergency tasks. (7) The load of the vehicle driven by the driver is spilled or scattered, resulting in a traffic accident. (8) When the driver drives a motor vehicle in reverse, a traffic accident occurs with other vehicles or pedestrians behind the vehicle.

9) The driver drives a non-motorized vehicle in the wrong direction on a non-motorized lane and has a traffic accident with a non-motorized vehicle driving in the straight direction. (10) The driver drives a non-motorized vehicle in a non-motorized lane to overtake a non-motorized vehicle driving in the same direction and causes a traffic accident. (11) Unilateral traffic accidents occur on vehicles.

[Legal basis].

Article 60 of the Provisions on Procedures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents The traffic management department of the public security organ shall determine the responsibility of the parties according to the role played by the actions of the parties in the occurrence of road traffic accidents and the severity of the fault. (1) Where a road traffic accident is caused by the fault of one of the parties, full responsibility shall be borne by the party; (2) Where a road traffic accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, the primary responsibility, equal responsibility and secondary responsibility shall be borne respectively according to the effect of their actions on the accident and the severity of the fault; (3) None of the parties is at fault for causing the road traffic accident, and if it is a traffic accident, neither party is liable.

Diagrams make it impossible to distinguish responsibilities. Turn left to turn big turn, right turn to small turn, as long as you turn according to this regulation, it is impossible to scratch. Therefore, whoever fails to make a big or small turn according to the regulations should be fully responsible.

When determining responsibility, the general traffic police will draw a virtual arc to represent the standardized turning route of the two vehicles. If your drawing exactly matches the trajectory at the time, then it is obvious that the left-turning car is fully responsible, because the left-turning car is obviously turning too little. At some large intersections, you can actually see that some lots have some arc dotted lines, which is a general indication of turns.

According to your diagram, the left turn and the right turn will not collide together, either you have a large turning radius or he has a small turning radius.

The van hits you head-on on the side and he's at great responsibility. But if you go to your insurance, you can ask the other party to give you a certain amount of monetary compensation, on the grounds that the price of the next year's insurance will increase because of the accident.

If the accident is caused by the fault of one party, it shall bear full responsibility;

If an accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, the severity of the accident shall be judged according to the severity of their behavior, and they shall be liable separately;

The parties are not at fault on the road, and if it is a traffic accident, the parties are not liable. One party intentionally causes a road accident, and the other party is not liable.

Question: The motorcycle does not have a driver's license and does not have a license plate. Didn't drink. The sedan did not drink, and the formalities were complete. Look at who is responsible for this.

The motorcycle goes straight and the sedan turns.

Question: It doesn't matter if the motorcycle has a driver's license or not. Documents. It's wrong 1 for a big car to hit a small car, and it's wrong 2 to turn a corner and go straight, right?

Question: I'm asking about your analysis.

All the responsibility for the traffic accident, and then the responsibility of both parties, the deeper the responsibility of both parties, who will bear it?

From the narrative situation, the vehicle on the left has the obligation to give way, and the vehicle on the right has the right to give way. If a traffic accident occurs as a result, the vehicle on the left side should bear the main responsibility.

The determination of specific responsibility should also be comprehensively determined based on the situation at the scene of the traffic police investigation and other evidence.

As shown in your diagram, it should be b's responsibility. A is to go straight, B is to turn left, according to the principle of turning to go straight, B should give way to A. The division of specific responsibilities is subject to the on-site investigation of the traffic police.

Kiss. Who is responsible is determined differently. If the accident is caused by the fault of one party, it shall bear full responsibility; If an accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, the severity of the accident shall be judged according to the severity of their behavior, and they shall be liable separately; The parties are not at fault on the road, and if it is a traffic accident, the parties are not liable.

One party intentionally causes a road accident, and the other party is not liable.

Questions. <>

Motorcycles do not have a driver's license and do not have a license plate. Didn't drink. The sedan did not drink, and the formalities were complete. Look at who is responsible for this.

The motorcycle goes straight and the sedan turns.

The car is responsible, but the motorcycle is driving without a license, and the specific situation is subject to the traffic police judgment.

Questions. It doesn't matter if the motorcycle has a driver's license or not. Documents. It's wrong 1 for a big car to hit a small car, and it's wrong 2 to turn a corner and go straight, right?

Hello, determined by the traffic police.

Questions. I'm asking about your analysis.

Twenty-eight open. Questions. Thank you.

The responsibility for traffic accidents shall be determined by the traffic police department according to the scene of the accident.

Friends, this traffic accident, should be the turning vehicle accounted for the main responsibility, the division of responsibility, should be four or six or three or seven points of responsibility, turning vehicles are six, straight vehicles are four, simply put, that is, the turning vehicle to account for the main responsibility, you don't look at the straight car hit by the turning car, but, from the road to the road driving vehicles, should first observe the road conditions before you can drive on the road, this is also the traffic law, why do I say that the straight car is also responsible! That's easy! Vehicles on the road should slow down and pass through village intersections when passing through village intersections, now it is clear!

Hope my !

You should let the vehicle on the right ...... first

Isn't this a crossroads? How is it a T-junction? If it's an intersection.

There are no signal lights at the intersection and no yield signs. Both sides are going straight. Then we should use the principle of giving right to divide responsibilities.

You are on the right side of the opposing vehicle. The opposing vehicle wants you to go first. Otherwise, an accident happens.

At the very least, the opposing vehicle bears the primary responsibility. If you have not committed any other illegal acts. The other party is fully responsible.

No responsibility. If you have other offenses as well. Then the other party is primarily responsible.

You are secondary responsibility.

Car A in the picture is fully responsible.

Since the other party's unlicensed, unlicensed, and taillight-free scrapped motorcycles can't be on the road, so the first thing you have to confirm is this, according to your statement, if his procedures are formal, then your rear-end collision is confirmed, no matter how you hit it, his tail damage is rear-end, your full responsibility, so you'd better confirm his license!

After the accident is handled, the traffic police will ask you to sign the transcript and the accident ruling, as for whether the traffic police should issue photos of your car and scratches on the floor, etc., you can see it in the process of administrative litigation! The accident analysis is available in the verdict!

If someone has a relationship, don't rush to sign the award. As long as you solve it through the law, then the position of the traffic police is difficult to protect, and it is impossible for the traffic police to let you go through the procedure of litigation for small accidents!

Rear-end collision is the responsibility of the vehicle behind you because you did not pay attention to the state of the vehicle in front of you and did not keep a safe distance from the vehicle in front of you!