Please, everyone, case study, tonight, I m only going to have 25 points, and I ve given them all

The boundary between this crime and the crime of intentional damage to property.

There are similarities in the conduct between the two, because while the perpetrator destroys production and operation by destroying machinery and equipment and mutilating farm animals, he will inevitably destroy public and private property. Although this crime uses means such as destroying machinery and equipment and mutilating farm animals, although it will cause the destruction of property, this is not the purpose of the perpetrator, and the purpose of the perpetrator is to destroy production and business operations through the above-mentioned means, so as to achieve his own revenge or other personal illegal goals.

The destruction of machinery and equipment, the mutilation of farm animals, etc., are only means to achieve their ends; The purpose of the latter crime is to destroy public or private property in such a way that it loses its value or use value in part or even in full. (2) The object of infringement is different. The object of this crime is specific property, i.e., machinery and equipment that has been put into use and cultivated animals during service that are directly related to life and business activities.

It is through the destruction of property directly related to production and business activities that the intention of destroying production and operation is realized. If it is not related to production and operation, such as property that is spare or idle in a warehouse, even machinery and equipment, it cannot be the object of this crime, but it can constitute the object of the crime of intentional destruction of property, which also includes means of subsistence. (3) The direct object is different.

This crime infringes upon the state-owned, collective, and individual production and business activities; The latter is the ownership of public and private property.

Punish. Whoever commits this crime is to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release; where the circumstances are serious, the sentence is between three and seven years imprisonment.

Personally, I believe that defendant Li's behavior constitutes the crime of sabotage of production, and the citrus trees in this case are directly related to life and business activities, and have the purpose of venting anger and retaliation.

Is his land contracted or his own?

If it is one, it is "one", and if it is contracted, it is "two".

Because Li destroyed citrus trees in order to vent his anger and revenge, so that citrus production could not be carried out smoothly, it meets the definition of the crime of sabotage of production and operation, and is consistent with the constitutive elements of his crime, so he should be convicted of the crime of sabotage of production and operation!

Hope it helps!!

1. Purpose of the study.

There are many factors influencing the growth of China's tax revenue, but according to the analysis, the main factors may be: (1) From the macroeconomic point of view, the overall economic growth is the basic source of tax growth. (2) The demand of public finance, tax revenue is the main body of fiscal revenue, and the development of social economy and the improvement of social security all put forward requirements for public finance, so the demand for public finance expressed in budget expenditure may have a certain impact on the tax revenue of the year.

3) Price level. China's tax structure is dominated by turnover tax, and the GDP and other indicators calculated by the current ** and the income level of operators are related to the price level. (4) Tax policy factors.

Second, the model setting.

In order to fully reflect the overall picture of China's tax growth, the "tax revenue" (referred to as "tax revenue") in the "national fiscal revenue" including ** and local tax revenue is selected as the explanatory variable to reflect the growth of national tax revenue. "Gross Domestic Product (GDP)" is selected as a proxy for the overall level of economic growth; Selecting ** and local "fiscal expenditures" as representatives of public finance needs; Select the "Retail Price Index" as a proxy for the price level.

The following data were collected from the China Statistical Yearbook (see Table 1):

Year Tax revenue (100 million yuan).

y) Gross domestic product (100 million yuan).

x2) Fiscal expenditure (100 million yuan).

x3) Retail Sales** Index (%)

x4) Table 1 China's tax revenue and related data.

The linear regression model is set as:

3. Estimated parameters.

The parameters of the model were estimated using the eviewsz least squares method, and the results are as follows.

Table 2 Based on the data in Table 2, the results of the model estimation are as follows:

t= (f= df=21

Fourth, model testing.

1. Economic significance test.

The model estimation results show that for every 100 million yuan of GDP growth in the current year, tax revenue will increase by 100 million yuan, assuming that other variables remain unchanged. Assuming that other variables remain unchanged, for every 100 million yuan increase in fiscal expenditure in the current year, tax revenue will increase by 100 million yuan. Assuming that other variables remain unchanged, the tax revenue will increase by 100 million yuan if the retail price index is ** one percentage point in the current year. This is consistent with theoretical analysis and empirical judgment.

2. Statistical testing.

1) Goodness of fit: From the data in Table 2, we can obtain: The corrected coefficient of decision is , which indicates that the model fits the sample well.

2) T-test: Given the level of significance, the degree of freedom of the t-distribution table is n-k-1=21, and the critical value is . From the data in Table 2, the absolute values of the t-statistic corresponding to and , respectively, are greater than , indicating that the intercept and the three skews have passed the significance test.

Our teacher also assigned this homework, and I'm worried too, hehe.

Why SK2 withdrew from the Chinese market.

Nestlé has double standards at home and abroad.

Why Kodak is recalling products globally is ignoring Chinese customers.

Sony's services in China.

Lenovo's foreign services are better than those in China.

PetroChina USA raised 2 billion yuan and paid 20 billion US dollars in dividends.

CIIC White gave Blackstone money and then sent Blue Star for cleaning.

CCB strategic investors recover costs 3 times and pick up more than 10% in vain**These can be found on the Internet, and you can find and summarize the specific content yourself.

Subject to the provisions of the contract! This is the same in any country.

Subject to the contract! Endorse the ground floor.

It can be revoked, depending on the contract.

The contract may be rescinded, and the contract stipulates that the delivery of the goods is liquor, and the seller delivers the goods as wine, which is in breach of the contract, and can be revoked according to the terms of the contract name.

1 The customer is God, and the image of the company should not be damaged by the profit of the eye.

2 It can be publicized in large publications and on television.

3 Customers are vulnerable, and we should help.