Why is it said that it is supply and demand that affect the price of goods, not the cost of products

Textbooks say that it is supply and demand that affect the first commodity **, but the cost of the product is also an influencing factor, which cannot be denied. I think the reason why supply and demand were chosen and nothing else was mentioned.

From the concept of "**". It is the consideration paid by both parties to the transaction, so that it should be meaningful in the market link, and the relationship between supply and demand is the most critical factor that determines the transaction behavior of both parties. The cost of the product exists in the production process, on the surface, the cost is high and must be raised, so I say it will also affect the price, but this is mainly the wishful thinking of the producer, the company did not control the cost, resulting in high costs, the commodity is determined by the market, and will not be raised because of the high cost, it can also be said that the concept of the first here is the transaction, not the pricing.

From the perspective of market influencing factors, the impact of supply and demand on the market is more critical. Assuming that the cost is high, the enterprise will also increase production, resulting in oversupply, some goods will be unsalable, and the price must be reduced, so the role of supply and demand in market regulation is very important, and the cost is much weaker.

In addition, the statement in the textbook mainly considers factors such as the increase in product costs, and finally affects the commodity by changing the supply and demand relationship.

Hello! It is impossible to express the full cause and effect of this question in a few words, so I will introduce the problem itself. It is often said that if a commodity is in short supply and more demand, there will naturally be people who coax the mediator, which is the direct reason, and does not care about the manufacturing cost of the commodity itself.

If you don't understand, feel free to communicate with me

Summary. Because the commodity depends on competitors, depends on the market, depends on the cost and the needs of customers, and so on, what you said is not completely wrong, but it is not comprehensive, so it will be determined that he is wrong in the judgment question.

Because the commodity depends on competitors, depends on the market, depends on the cost and the needs of customers, and so on, what you said is not completely wrong, but it is not comprehensive, so it will be determined that he is wrong in the judgment question.

The correct way to put it is not only about the cost of production.

The market supply depends on the factors that determine the supply of an individual seller: the amount of an item, the inputs used to produce it, the technology available, and the expectations. In addition, the market supply also depends on the number of sellers.

If Ben or Jerry quit the ice cream business, the market supply would be reduced or unscrupulous. The supply table shows what happens to the supply as ** changes, when all other variables that determine the supply are constant.

Like the demand curve, we add up the individual supply curve horizontally to arrive at the market supply curve. That is to say, in order to get the total supply at any kind of **, we add the individual supply represented on the horizontal axis of the individual supply curve. The market supply curved shirt car line indicates how the total supply of an item changes with its ** change.

The movement of the supply curve.

Suppose the sugar has dropped. How does this change affect the availability of ice cream? Since sugar is an input in the production of ice cream, the decline in sugar makes it more profitable to sell ice cream.

With the exception of **, any change in the factors that determine supply will cause the supply curve to move. Any change in the amount of supply that increases at each ** level will move the supply curve to the right. Similarly, any change in decreasing supply at each level shifts the supply curve to the left.

Put simply, the supply curve represents how the supply of an item changes when all other factors that determine supply are constant. When one of these other determinants changes, the supply curve moves.

Summary. When the supply decreases, it will be, and in this way, the profit will increase, so as to achieve the purpose of restoring the profit.

Good morning, dear. <>

The impact on supply is that when ****, the supply increases; When ** drops, the supply decreases. Residual fissure expansion data: This is because with the increase of the product, the producer can get more profits, thus increasing the supply; And when the vertical and closed** declines, the producer's profit will decrease, thus reducing the supply.

Why is it necessary to reduce the supply of profits?

When the supply decreases, it will be, and in this way, the profit will increase, so as to achieve the purpose of restoring the profit.

Summary. In economic life, value determines **, and supply and demand also affect**. In turn, changes in supply and demand also have a certain impact.

The impact of changes on supply is mainly reflected in two aspects: adjusting output: declining - decreasing profits - reducing output; ** Rise – increase in profit – increase in production; Adjust the input of factors of production

A factor of production ** declines - increases production; Factors of production** rise - production decreases.

In the life of Sun Qiao or Ji, value determines **, and supply and demand will also affect**. In turn, changes in supply and demand also have a certain impact. **The impact of the change on the supply of broadsails is mainly reflected in two aspects:

Adjust the output: ** decline - profit reduction - reduction of production is less; ** Rise – increase in profit – increase in production; Adjust the input of factors of production: a factor of production ** declines - increases production; Factors of production** rise - production decreases.

How changes in profit affect supply.

The change in supply mainly depends on the profit level of the enterprise, and the profit level is determined by the market and the cost of production, so the basic element of the total supply is the cost and the cost. For example, technological progress, changes in wage levels, changes in energy and raw materials, and other so-called "external shocks" are all affected by the impact of costs, and thus affect the total supply.

If you have your own personal computer, maybe it uses Microsoft's operating system, some kind of Windows software. When Microsoft first designed Windows software many years ago, it applied for and received the copyright granted by the policy. Copyright gives Microsoft the exclusive right to manufacture and sell the Windows operating system.

So, if a person wants to buy Windows software, he has no choice but to give Microsoft the nearly $100 it decided to charge for such a product. It can be said that Microsoft has a monopoly in the Windows software market.

Microsoft's business decisions cannot be properly described using the business behavior model we propose in Chapter 14. In that chapter, we analyzed the competitive market, where there are many companies that offer essentially the same products, so that each one has little influence on what it gets. In contrast, a monopolist like Microsoft has no close competitors and, therefore, can influence the market for its products**.

The competitor is the recipient, while the monopoly is the formulator.

In this chapter, we examine the implications of this market power. We will illustrate that market forces have changed the relationship between firms** and their costs. Competitors take the quality of their products as a given and choose the supply quantity so that the price index is equal to the marginal cost.

In contrast, the monopolist charges more than the marginal cost. This result is obviously true in the case of Microsoft Windows software. The marginal cost of Windows software — the extra cost that Microsoft would have incurred by copying its program to another disk — was only a few dollars.

The market** for Windows software is many times its marginal cost.

I think the relationship between supply and demand is the decision of the first draft, for the May Day holiday hotel ** soaring phenomenon, people's views specifically include the change in supply and demand relationship is reasonable, because of the change in operating costs caused by the **** is also understandable, and the **** is too large is not in line with the interests of all parties is unreasonable.

First, the relationship between supply and demand changes, resulting in the hotel ****, this situation is reasonable. Hotels** are not static, but change with the relationship between supply and demand. When demand decreases, hotels reduce prices in order to attract more customers.

When the May Day holiday comes, the passenger flow increases, the demand turns strong, and the hotel will raise prices moderately, which is a very normal phenomenon, but **soaring several times, I think it is unreasonable.

Second, it is understandable and reasonable to cause **** because of changes in operating costs. In addition to the relationship between supply and demand, the hotel's ** is also related to operating costs. When the operation enters the peak season, the labor and other costs incurred in the operation process of the hotel will also rise, and these factors will eventually affect the hotel.

Regarding this situation, it is understandable and reasonable, and the price increase is okay, but it is too much worse than usual and unreasonable.

Third, the hotel **** is too large to meet the interests of all parties and is an unreasonable phenomenon. Although we can understand the phenomenon of hotel **** caused by the strong demand for holidays, but when the hotel is doubled, this kind of situation becomes unreasonable and even unacceptable. This kind of filial piety phenomenon is unacceptable to customers, and the resulting decrease in passenger flow will also cause losses to black hotels, so this practice that is not in the interests of all parties is unreasonable and should be corrected in time.