Immanuel Kant What is the relationship between reason reason in the critique of pure reason and I

What Kant wants to criticize is the rationalist thought represented by Descartes, which refers to a rational act, but it has gone beyond itself and points to the perceived, which Kant questions through the foundation of the transcendental self.

Descartes' "I think" is close to an intuition, just knowing that I am thinking, and how to know, but not being able to explain it clearly. Kant's "reason" can be seen as an explanation of our thoughts, and its scope must be overshadowed, including not only the "unity" of the self that directly looks at it, but also the various regulations of how reason works.

What is the general problem with Kant's Critique of Pure Reason?

a.How is metaphysical asphalt, as a natural inclination, possible?

b.How is metaphysics, as a key to science, possible?

c.How is innate comprehensive judgment possible?

d.How is it possible to make pure imitation of natural science?

Correct answer: c

What is the general problem with Kant's Critique of Pure Reason?

a.How is metaphysics, as a natural tendency, possible?

b.How is metaphysics, as a school of science, possible?

c.How is it possible to make a congenital comprehensive judgment of fiber?

d.How is pure natural science possible?

Correct answer: c

Regarding Kant's pure reason, it is Feng Lazhi who is wrong ().

a. People are born with the ability to understand things.

b. The initial vision can only be the appearance.

c. There are limitations to people's innate cognitive ability.

d. Human beings can see the essence of things through reason.

Correct answer: d

Kant's philosophical "critique" means that the object of analysis is reason, which is human reason. Rationality has two functions, one is theoretical rationality, i.e., epistemic function, and the other is practical rationality, i.e., volitional function. In the former, Kant sometimes called it "intellectuality", because in Kant, intellectuality is the cognitive ability in the strict sense.

The latter is sometimes referred to as "rationality".

As far as theoretical rationality (cognitive ability) is concerned, it can be divided into three links: sensibility, intellectuality, and rationality. This is rationality in the narrow sense.

Rationality, as a link of theoretical rationality, is a kind of "ideal unity", which represents the principle of human reason's attempt to further compose knowledge into a system and pursue the ideal of completeness, which Kant called "adjustment", to distinguish it from the principle of intellectual constitutivity. As far as knowledge is concerned, reason has a tendency to lead the progress of knowledge towards infinity, and although this tendency can never be realized, it is nevertheless meaningful for the progress and development of knowledge.

One point of the outline: How is innate comprehensive judgment possible?

That is, what do we know about the world, and how can we guarantee the universal inevitability of the truth of the natural sciences.

There is no mention of goodness and beauty.

Reason cannot be used as the essence that determines the ultimate ontology of the universe, but can only be understood in a limited way.

I recommend Professor Deng Xiaomang's "Lectures on Kant's Philosophy", which is easy to understand and suitable for beginners.

Transcendental Sensibility Theory Transcendental Logic Transcendental Dialectics Pure Reason Transcendental Method.

To put it simply, there are three words: truth, goodness, and beauty.