What is the difference between the Canon 50 1 2 and the 50 1 4 in color and picture quality

Let's put it mildly.

It's an indisputable fact that 50 is more oily than 50.

If you are a landlord, you actually have to look at your own machine.

If it's not a high-end body, it is very easy to get out of focus with 50, because the body's focusing ability is not enough.

On a practical level, the 50 is more suitable for everyday shooting (not advertising), and the imaging effect is definitely not bad.

5D2 is a mid-range fuselage,Use 50 will run the focus,The landlord compares his own machine。

I don't know about this, but I can tell you something that I really encountered.

One time I went to the Canon Jinbao Street repair center in Beijing to do a regular dust check on my 70-200 to clean the chip in my camera, and there was a professional photographer in front of me who took his 50 to do a correction check for the out of focus, because his body was the same as mine, which was 5d2

I heard the Canon technician and the cinematographer say that the 50 head is a bit lagging at some technical levels, that it is inverted because of the compatibility between the body and the lens, that the head is easy to go out of focus on the 5d2, and that it doesn't help much when it comes to adjusting and correcting the camera in the camera.

Later listening to their conversation, Canon's technicians said that 50 was worthless.

And then I struck up with the photographer, and after we left the Canon repair center, we went to Wukesong Photographic Equipment City, and he sold 50 and bought 85

As for the color and image quality, you can refer to the structural analysis and evaluation of the lens, which can be found on the forums of Hummingbird and Jiayou**, and they are basically pinned posts.

Many photographers also told me that the 50 has the quality of a red circle head, and it is the most cost-effective head in Canon's header.

The above is what I have encountered and the advice I have given you, I am not professional, I can only talk about these for your reference, if there is anything you don't understand, you still need a master answer.

This difference can't be expressed in any language, you can only go to a big photography forum to find the ** with these two heads, and then compare, or the most practical way is to experience these two heads yourself, so that you can know the difference between color and picture quality.

The aperture larger than the one is purely a luxury, and it is not much worse than the one with .

The Canon 5D4 is a Canon EF-mount full-frame SLR camera.

Fuselage. Canon lenses are Canon EF mount full-frame SLR lenses.

From the point of view of the format and the bayonet, the two are exactly matched. With such a combination, the most suitable subject for shooting is portrait shooting. At the same time, this combination is also a very suitable choice for shooting landscape sketches and humanistic documentary themes.

In addition, this combination is also suitable for shooting still lifes, and it is also possible to shoot close-ups. In short, this is a collocation that can be adapted to a variety of genres.

Of course, Canon is not alone in the 50-lens range. Other manufacturers also have 50 such lenses. For the Canon 5D4 body, these lenses belong to the "side lens" ......These lenses are also ...... with the Canon 5D4 without a problemAs long as the two conditions of mount matching (Canon EF mount) or can be transferred through the adapter ring, this 50 lens can be used perfectly with the Canon 5D4 body, and there is no pressure to shoot all kinds of subjects.

There is a question to consider......Among the sub-factory lenses, some of the lenses are manual heads. These lenses are not autofocused. In addition, there are some lenses with a mount that does not match the 5D4 body, and although they can be used after the transfer, the autofocus function may not be able to use ......These two 50 lenses with a 5D4 body can only focus manually......

Both lenses use the classic double Gaussian structure, and the image quality is excellent, and the focal point is better, except for the aperture of half a level, there is no big difference in the outer focus. The plastic feeling is too heavy, and there is no feel at all, which is the biggest difference between and. The second is that the hole is scorched in the dark, and it is difficult to accurately focus at the aperture with the three-digit body.

Due to the much longer focusing stroke ratio, the focusing accuracy is much higher. As for the fuselage that is placed on the APS, it seems that Qi is too long sleepy, and the practicality has decreased. at the same aperture; The imaging sharpness and color reproduction are definitely better than the other.

The aperture is also a notch larger, which is definitely more practical in some less well-lit conditions.

As for the difference in focal length, it can only mean that it is difficult to compare the situation you use. The choice of and is basically the difference in focal length.

The Canon 50 lens has good performance, but it is not very high, and it is very cost-effective. It is worth buying for users who need this type of lens.

The Canon 50 lens is a mid-focal length and large-aperture prime lens.

From a focal length perspective, this lens is suitable for portraits.

At the same time, the lens has a wide aperture, which can achieve good background and foreground bokeh effects, making it easier to highlight the subject when shooting portraits, and shoot well-layered works.

In addition, the ** of this lens is very low, so it is a typical lens with not low performance, but not high, and it is very cost-effective, known as one of the "three treasures ......of the poor".

Therefore, for users whose situation matches the condition of this lens, this lens is definitely worth buying.

However, this lens is not flawless.

First of all, the workmanship and materials of this lens are average. This is determined by its positioning......Because the positioning is not high, its production cost must be relatively low, so its workmanship materials are generally ......For users who are looking for high-end lenses, this lens is not worth buying.

Secondly, the relatively general workmanship and materials determine that the image quality of this lens is also relatively ......Of course, from an absolute point of view, the image quality of this lens is still good. However, compared with high-end lenses, there is a real gap in image quality, especially the bokeh effect is average.

Therefore, whether this lens is worth starting depends on the user's needs ......

The Canon 50 is an excellent large-aperture prime lens, and it's worth buying for portraits.

1. Lightweight, simple but reliable structure;

2. It's absolutely no problem to shoot portraits with aperture, the sharpness at the beginning of the above is very good, and at the beginning, it looks like it has reached the optimal state with the naked eye, which can be said to be unstoppable!

3. Although the color is not rich, it is ten true, giving people a refreshing feeling, and the optical system is absolutely "standard";

4. Although the autofocus sound is slightly louder than that of the ring motor, it is very fast;

The original factory is not recommended to buy, and now the Sigma Canon mouth on the market is very cost-effective, not less than the original head, and ** can be bought at 2150. The imaging and color are very good and are also used by many professional photographers.

This one is okay at home, but it's very old, and it's more suitable for a half-width machine.

You might as well be able to go to full frame in the future.