How did the landlord class rule over the peasant class? Is it a rule?

Updated on educate 2024-05-16
14 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    In feudal times, the ruling class was the landlord class. The so-called landlord class uses the right to own land as the standard of wealth and is used to rule the people, and the land is everything owned by the people, but the people do not own the land, they can only obtain the right to use the land in the form of rent, and then pay the rent with the harvested grain. The landlord class, relative to the lowest class of poor peasants, is defined by whether or not they own land.

    does not one-sidedly refer to one or two people such as Huang Shiren in the white-haired girl. To put it simply, in the feudal period, the emperor was the largest landowner, and the emperor gave land to various nobles, large and small, who rented out the land to collect rent. The emperor and the nobles together made up the entire landowning class.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    First of all, the emperor and his bureaucratic system are the largest landlords, and theoretically, the whole world is not the king's land, and this system can deprive anyone, including the rich. In this way, it can be understood how Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty and other emperors could vigorously pursue the policy of cracking down on the powerful and powerful, while the regime was still stable, and Zhu Yuanzhang could also come up with various policies to try to protect the interests of poor and small peasants.

    Of course, the rich people of the people can still retain some of the right to rule. For example, the power of exploitation, and no matter how heavy the taxes of the imperial court are, they will be passed on to the hired peasants, and the grain exemption policy given by the imperial court is often not exempted from the tenant farmers. There was also the power to enforce the law, and landlords could often set up private courts to torture and torture their domestic slaves and hired farmers.

    Wait a minute... In short, the interests of the rich are generally quite guaranteed. Otherwise, would the feudal system still have enough class power to maintain it?

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    All the ruling classes rely on the power they hold and the means of ruling through the exercise of power.

    The second problem is that the promotion of political power depends on coercive means, the peasant class does not hold political power, has no power, and the rules of operation of feudal society are formulated and forcibly promoted by the landlord class.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The landlord owns most or all of the means of production and needs the productive forces to create value, and the peasant class is the labor force, so the landlord class can rule the peasant class.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The landlord class and the bourgeoisie are two different social classes. The differences are as follows:

    1. The landlord class is the upper class of feudal society, while the bourgeoisie is the upper class of capitalist society.

    2. The landlord class is the oppressive class that exploits the peasants in feudal society, while the bourgeoisie is the oppressive class that exploits the broad masses of workers in capitalist society.

    3. If we compare the landlord class with the bourgeoisie, the landlord class belongs to the old forces and the representatives of the backward productive forces, while the bourgeoisie belongs to the new forces and the representatives of the new productive forces, and the landlord class is finally driven out of the historical stage by the bourgeoisie.

    Many analysts will make a more delicate division of the bourgeoisie. These divisions are:

    1. High bourgeoisie: composed of the richest people, including entrepreneurs, ** families, etc.

    2. Middle bourgeoisie: Those who have a fixed inheritance or income, and who are less wealthy than the upper bourgeoisie.

    3. Petty bourgeoisie or petite bourgeoisie: senior white-collar workers or people who start their own businesses with a small amount of money, and they may employ a small number of employees.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The landlord class was a product of feudal society, and it did not completely disappear until after the founding of New China. There are two main reasons why the landlord class will arise, one is inIn ancient times, land could be bought and sold at will, so some people had large amounts of land with their strong economic strength, and then rented it to farmers for cultivation and collected rent from it. The other is that the aristocracy has the right to land through privilege, and the original landowners either leave or only have the right to cultivate and pay annual rent.

    In modern society, China stipulates that land only belongs to the state or collective, and cannot belong to a certain person, and individuals can lease but cannot buy and sell, so there is no direct landlord. WhenHowever, if a person wants to cultivate a large amount of land, he can contract it to the state or the collective, but the ownership does not belong to him.

    1. Ancient land can be bought and sold at will

    The feudal dynasty lasted for thousands of years, and during this long process, the land was owned by a small number of people. In particular, land can be bought and sold at will, and when a person has relatively strong economic strength, he can buy a large amount of fertile land and eventually become a landlord class. He could not cultivate the land alone, so he rented it to the peasants again and exploited it.

    2. The landlord class mostly came from among the aristocracy

    In feudal dynasties, royal families and nobles generally owned a large amount of land, and these lands were owned for generations. There were also some people who were originally ordinary people, but because of their meritorious service to the country, the emperor rewarded him with a large amount of farmland, and eventually these people also became the landlord class. The landlord class bought and sold land with each other, and eventually the poor became poorer and the rich richer.

    3. There will be no more landlords in modern society

    After the founding of the People's Republic of China, the landlord class completely disappeared, and all land throughout the country was owned by the state and collectives. Although some people have hundreds or even thousands of acres of land in their hands, they only have the right to cultivate, and they only contract it from the state or the collective. The state does not sell these lands to individuals, thus guaranteeing that there will be no more landlords.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The landlord class was mainly born in the feudal society, because they owned a lot of land, and they were able to hire other peasants to work for themselves, and they had more assets than the peasants, so they formed the landlord class; Now there is no such thing as a landlord class, and now China is a socialist country, and every citizen of the country belongs to the proletariat, and there is no distinction between other classes.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    This is because the landlords have more land in their hands, so they will rent their land to some peasants, so such a landlord class has been formed. There are no landlords, and now the land is state-owned.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The landlord class is mainly because some people can earn money, and some people can't, and now there are no landlords, but now there are poor and rich people.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Landlord class. The basis for the exploitation of the peasants was feudalism.

    The main way is to extract land rent, and labor rent, rent in kind, and money rent are the three specific forms of feudal rent, usury.

    It is another important means for the landlord class to exploit the peasant class.

    The feudal landlords mainly subleased the land to the peasants for cultivation in order to collect rent, except for exploiting slaves or hired laborers to manage the land they occupied. With the development of the fixed rent system and the perpetual tenant system, tenant farmers got rid of the landlord's intervention in production activities, and could rationally arrange production, flexibly use their own family's labor force, and relatively expand their operational independence.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Hello, The feudal landlord class oppressed the peasant class politically and ideologically: (1) Based on the feudal land ownership system, the main way for the landlord class to exploit the peasants was to extract land rent. Labor rent, rent in kind, and money rent are the three specific forms of feudal rent.

    2) usury is another important means for the landlord class to exploit the peasant class; Forcing the peasants to pay exorbitant taxes was also an important way for the landlord class to exploit the peasants. A large number of peasants were sent to serve in forced labor.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    In modern China, the feudal relations of production have never undergone fundamental changes; from the point of view of the land system, the private ownership of land by the landlords has always been dominant, the peasants are still oppressed and exploited by the landlords, and the contradictions between the landlord class and the peasant class have always existed, and sometimes they are still very prominent. However, the textbooks do not express the domestic contradiction as the contradiction between the landlord class and the peasant class. This is because the economic structure and class relations of modern Chinese society have undergone great changes.

    From the point of view of economic structure, in addition to the natural economy, foreign capitalist economy and national capitalist economy appeared, and in the late modern period, bureaucratic capitalist economy and new democratic economy appeared. From the point of view of class relations, the proletariat, the national bourgeoisie and the bureaucratic bourgeoisie appeared.

    As a result, the class contradictions in modern Chinese society have also complicated. In addition to the contradictions between the landlord class and the peasant class, there are also contradictions between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, and contradictions between the national bourgeoisie and the big landlords, big compradors, and bureaucratic bourgeoisie. The contradiction between the landlord class and the peasant class is only a part of the contradiction between feudalism and the masses of the people.

    Therefore, the contradiction between the landlord class and the peasant class cannot be expressed in terms of the domestic contradictions in modern Chinese society.

    Second, we must be clear: the contradiction between foreign capitalism and the Chinese nation has not always been the most important contradiction in modern Chinese society. The development of the two main contradictions is unbalanced.

    It can be said that when the great powers launched a large-scale war of aggression against China, the contradiction between foreign capitalism and the Chinese nation was the most important contradiction. It is precisely because of this that the Qing Dynasty declared war on the outside world, the patriotic officers and soldiers resisted bravely, the masses of the people spontaneously resisted foreign aggression, and the Kuomintang and the Communist Party joined hands for the second time and the anti-Japanese national united front was formed.

    The contradiction between feudalism and the masses of the people is most prominent when the great powers change their means and methods of aggression against China, using economic, political rather than military means, and indirect methods of "governing China with China" instead of direct colonial rule. For example, the period of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Movement, the period of the rule of the Beiyang warlords, the period of the ten-year confrontation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, and the period of the War of Liberation.

    In short, the semi-colonial and semi-feudal social nature of modern China determines the main contradictions in Chinese society, and the changes in the status of the two contradictions affect the course of modern China's historical development.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Hello, the landlord class is the main exploiting class under the landlord economy, and the closed class is also the main ruling class in feudal society. It has strata divided by feudal hierarchy. In China, there are mainly the following types of landlords:

    There were hereditary landlords and gentry landlords with high social status and political privileges, who possessed, forcibly occupied, or forcibly bought land by virtue of their hereditary or non-hereditary status and privileges. They conceal their estates, under-collect or pass on their land endowments; and often legally or non-sedan to shelter relatives and other Dingkou. They were the most conservative, decadent and reactionary strata of the landlord class.

    There were common landlords with low social status and no political privileges. They were mainly small and medium-sized landowners. They were not only bullied by powerful landlords, but also relied on their wealth to collude with the government and oppress the villagers.

    Since land could be bought and sold, the composition of the landlord class was constantly changing. With the development of the social productive forces, the minimum amount of land required to obtain the status of landlords has decreased, and the numerical advantage of common landlords has increased. After the commodity economy developed greatly, industrial and commercial people bought land, and industrial and commercial landlords appeared.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    1. The meaning is different.

    Rich peasants are relatively small landowners, and the standards vary from place to place (data show that the standard of rich peasants in Jiangxi Province during the land reform was generally about 12 acres of farmland, and the per capita was about 3 acres). Generally speaking, however, the amount of land they owned, in addition to their own cultivation, about one-third of the surplus land was classified as kulak because they were too busy to work on it.

    Generally speaking, it refers to the landlord economy in feudal society, where the ruling class deprives the people of land ownership and exploits the peasants' landowners mainly in the form of land rent. All large landowners under the lordship economy in feudal society, such as feudal lords, are also called landlords.

    2. The nature is different.

    In China, before the land reform, the exploitation methods of the rich peasants were mainly the exploitation of wage labor (long-term and short-term labor), or usury, or a part of the land for rent, with a feudal and semi-feudal exploitative nature. During the period of the New Democratic Revolution, they may remain neutral in the struggle against imperialism.

    China's feudal landlords adopted a variety of forms of management for their own land: some were operated by themselves, in the form of exploiting slaves or hired laborers; The main thing is to divide the land to others for management, in the form of exploitation of dependent farmers or tenant farmers by rent. In the past dynasties, there were types of dependent peasants, such as private disciples, subordinates, and tenants.

Related questions
5 answers2024-05-16

The representative figures of the Westernization Movement are Prince Gong Yixin and Wenxiang, and the local representative figures are Zeng Guofan. >>>More

5 answers2024-05-16

In a nutshell, it's non-violent non-cooperation. The details are as follows: >>>More

15 answers2024-05-16

Father and son only appear in film and television dramas, but in reality, the lion is passed down from mother to daughter, the male lion is the main force of the battle, and the female lion doesn't have to care about anything, which is very comfortable.

8 answers2024-05-16

After the Treaty of Nanjing, the foreign powers came to set up factories, the Westernists had already begun to establish government-run enterprises, and private enterprises gradually appeared, and at that time there was already a relatively regular working class. >>>More

4 answers2024-05-16

Take stock of the three ways of regular investment: making money or giving it for free, depending on a small strategy.