What do you think the space battleship of the future will look like?

All parts of the ship, including **, are uniformly covered with strong interaction force armor, the maximum speed of light when non-wormhole driven, the cruising speed is 60% of the speed of light, the wormhole drive speed is infinite, the curvature drive engine, the antimatter engine, the nuclear fusion engine, the ion engine, and the wormhole engine are five in one. There are: conventional** (such as missiles equipped with wormhole engines, lasers, etc.), kinetic energy ** (such as light particles, etc.), regular** (such as two-way foils, etc.), space carriers** (such as space fighter groups, etc., aircraft carriers are equipped with many, ordinary warships are equipped with about ten), and fight in formation.

This is what I consider to be the space battleship of the future.

It looks like an ordinary meteorite, which is good for camouflage, and it is impossible to swagger like in science fiction movies. The main ** should be laser cannons and electromagnetic guns.

A round ball, covered with armor, with missile silo covers on top of the armor, with several vector thrusters.

Although there is no limit to size, reducing the surface of the body should be the primary goal of designers, and the shape of the cylinder is the first choice, but the aspect ratio should not be too large, otherwise it will affect the maneuvering, so it is probably cigar-shaped.

The above-surface part of the American littoral combat ship 2, symmetrical up and down, flattened, is basically the basic shape of the space ship Of course, there will be no portholes and chimneys, and the bridge will also be stored in the center. If kinetic energy bombs such as electromagnetic guns are popular in the future, arranging them along the central axis in the front can ensure that the enemy can be met directly in front and on the side chords to maximize the firepower, and it is also easier to carry out key protection arrangements.

There is no distinction between front and back, left and right, no matter which direction, there will be thrusters, there will be ** launch ports, missiles are only used to deal with the enemy who reach the near place, and no longer have long-range strike capabilities, space warfare will return to the era of artillery giants. And the shape of the space battleship is either a sphere or a cube.

There is no need to consider resistance in space, so space battleships should be the first to consider ** in the future, the size of the electromagnetic cannon in the future is very large, so the future space war should be in the form of fighting the main gun and escort drones and mechas, so it is either a battleship that returns to the previous giant ship cannon, or it is a main gun and many secondary guns that can be used for air defense like the current destroyer.

Stones and sticks, I feel that since the beginning of nuclear **, human beings, as living beings, have become more and more unable to control and cannot bear the consequences of war.

Large warships have a well-developed projectile interception system and high-strength energy shields. Make the confrontation between warships a fantasy. Small fighters rely on energy shields to resist interception systems, and use streamlined solid shells and instantaneous engine overloads to traumatize large warships, and because of their small size, they cannot exist without large warships, and can only engage in short-term battles.

Large warships form space combat power by releasing warplanes. Ground firepower has been used to support ground warfare.

I think that future space warships should be produced in docks in space, should have the ability to fly without working fluids, are mainly responsible for planetary blockade and interstellar operations, should be able to have supply ships for maintenance, and should have a life cycle system. It has the ability to project mass energy from outer space to hit ground targets!

An AI-controlled round missile carrier with a close-in defense gun and a nuclear-powered or antimatter carrier with its own universal 3D printer.

In the future, space warships will basically not appear or take melee combat as the main combat mission, command ships, early warning ships, transport ships, and long-range strike weapon platforms should be the main ones, and the melee combat missions are also handed over to space drones.

The first generation is a submarine with a vector engine, ** it is estimated that the electromagnetic cannon and laser - human beings have such a little technology.

and Star Trek 3Like the Enterprise, which surpasses the stars, its engine is a warp core, and it is a laser particle cannon and an antimatter cannon, as well as an isoelectric particle cannon.

Only exists in science fiction! It is currently impossible to build something of this size on the space station.

Installing engines and ** on some large rocky space meteorites, and even many parts can be made of local materials, so that the cost is relatively low, and if feasible, the starships may be strangely shaped.

Salamis-class light cruisers.

Like the EVE series, the nest is a bunch of countershots.

Just look at the one in "The Male Company" and you'll know about it.

You're just talking about science fiction.

Most likely, it is Figure 2.

I don't know, can you know the future.

The Star Trek movie series references a large number of U.S. Navy formations and images.

The U.S. Air Force is preparing for a "space force," but other branches of the military seem to have opinions. An article published by maritime security expert Matthew Hope in a US magazine believes that the space field is relatively close to the naval model, because the air force lacks a clear combat mentality and expertise.

The article argues that the navy is a complex division of labor, with crews of different specialties often going to various ships to perform tasks, and navigation also requires voyage planning and liaison management, which are quite similar to space operations. Some people will criticize the Navy for being a plane of motion and the Air Force for being three-dimensional, but the Navy also has three-dimensional operations, such as submarines, and naval pilots. Even the first Mercury astronauts in the United States were naval pilots.

Navy sailors also have a relatively good psychological quality, even though most spaceships are automated, but the ability of personnel to adapt is still quite important, Navy members can spend a long time in submarines, which is quite similar to the environment in the space station, or in the future on the moon and Mars bases in small spaceships and tunnels.

At present, the U.S. Navy is also responsible for some space defense, and Aegis destroyers are the first line of defense against space threats, and have also tested the ability to shoot down satellites.

In fact, for good reason, our popular culture also assumes that space belongs to the Navy, from Star Trek to Battlestar Galactica, the Space Starships and the Space Marines are all based on the Navy. If science fiction fans have seen the Aegis Combat Information Center and the bridge of the Virginia-class submarine, they should all agree that the command mode of the space capsule should belong to the Navy.

The article concludes by arguing that it is indeed necessary to establish a space force, but that the space force should not be classified under the banner of the air force, but should be the navy. In terms of institutional structure, personnel quality, and navigation mode, space is more like a navy, and finally the author said: "Remember, that's why we are used to calling spaceships!" ”

The difference between the Space Force and the Air Force is that the Space Force is mainly for space launch and control of outer space on Earth, while the Air Force is mainly for the sky within 30,000 meters of the Earth.

If there is a space fleet in the future, the space fleet should belong to a kind of branch of the Air Force.

Belongs to the Navy.

Because compared with the Air Force, which flies planes and releases missiles, space warships do more, which is equivalent to aircraft carriers. Imagine if only the Navy could do the combination of strike and delivery. And the three-dimensional combat navy is more suitable.

I think it should belong to the Air Force, and the space fleet flies in the air.

The space fleet should not belong to the Air Force.

Belonging to the Air Force, of course. Or the Space Army.

With humanity's yearning for interstellar colonization, imagine a ship capable of transporting humanity from one solar system to another, would it have wings and cockpits? Or does it look like an aircraft carrier or a flaming rocket with a glowing ion drive? Science fiction offers us a wide variety of visions of space.

It turns out that what space looks like depends entirely on what kind of space travel you need. ** The realistic design is more complex than any Hollywood dream and implanted consciousness. Let's take a look at what scientists envision in space!

Space** is not a spaceship.

In the near and distant future, American experts believe that space** will not spend a lot of time in the atmosphere. Perhaps the space that sends people from the ground to the stars** will still have "wings" that can abolish aerodynamics and all design principles in order to reduce wind resistance. A smooth or pointed "nose" is not required.

In short, it is more suitable for interstellar travelers, who have elongated arms and blatantly ignore the entire history of the Aerospace Center.

The center of gravity of survival.

Space** will focus on technology that maintains the center of gravity of passengers. Consider the necessity of a long-haul flight – gravity. Because in a prolonged period of zero gravity, the human body is eroded and loses bone and muscle density.

Through physics as we know it, you use a giant centrifuge to create gravity as if you were in a spinning cabin. The smaller the centrifuge, the more unstable the centrifugal force is, just like the body of the crew, in other words, in addition to making you feel chronically mildly disoriented, it can also make you feel top-heavy. Of course, humans can only survive on gravity.

Shipping method. The appearance of space also depends on your mode of transportation, and all propulsion methods come with their own problems. For example:

Sailboats propelled by solar photons or on-board lasers must contend with interstellar dust. There isn't much material in space, even tiny particles, and moving at the speed of light can be a hazard for **. Those dust particles can pass through the solar sail, and its impact risk can mean turning the crew cabin into a bunker and sticking the lie capable of all people and objects behind the redundant physical shielding.

The more you think about space, the more fascinating it becomes. The Federation's mastery of time, space, and everything in between allows experts to ignore the dangers of galactic cosmic rays and use a wide variety of force fields to prevent catastrophe. When a pulse drive converts 100% of its energy into thrust, a real container, subject to the laws of thermodynamics, can be filled with a dizzying array of panels, and space** generated by the excess heat generated by the propulsion system on the grounds of radiation is generated.

No matter how magical it is, I think the end result will be more powerful than **. (New discoveries in science and technology by Konstantin Wen).