Which brother has a complete modification tutorial for the rise of the country? Such as the number o

Modification of the aircraft carrier's aircraft-carrying capacity.

Thrones and Patriots Data folder.

Open it with a WordPad. Enable the search function and enter "carrier" to search. You will find that there is a column "", which defines the maximum amount of aircraft carried by each carrier.

7 "Naturally, it is the maximum number of carriers!" Change it as you wish! (I changed that.)

Please note that this is an actual modification, but the textual description of the carrier capacity has not been modified. Can you tolerate taking off n planes from an aircraft carrier and still showing "maintain a group of 7 fighter-bombers......"What? of course not!

Open it with a WordPad. Enable the search function and enter "aircraft carrier" to find it. You will find a column ", Hyundai icon33-maintained wing consisting of 7 fighter-bombers, capable of performing aviation missions.

Change "7" to the carrier capacity value you just defined!

At present, "The Rise of the Nation" does not have a complete revision tutorial, and it is only by self-exploration and learning from some masters that you know how to modify it.

Rise of the Nation Teach? The number of aircraft carriers, carrier-based aircraft, etc.

It's not the same thing at all。。 Problem clearing ability.

USS Bush, also known as USS George H.W. Bush nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, referred to as USS Bush, CVN-77 is the ship's side number, which was commissioned on January 10, 2009, and is manufactured by the American Twist Portnius Shipbuilding and Dockyard Company. The CVN-77 will continue the improvement of the CVN-76, and the flight deck will not change as much as originally envisaged, paving the way for the gradual design of the CVN-78. Known as the "Nimitz" Terminator of dreams, the ship is the last ship of the US "Nimitz" class aircraft carrier, and it is also the most expensive and advanced aircraft carrier in the Nimitz class.

This aircraft carrier is currently the most offensive aircraft carrier in the world. In terms of attack power, it can carry up to nearly 100 aircraft, and has multiple anti-aircraft missile launch systems and close-in defense guns. Because the United States will adopt a new aircraft carrier design scheme in the future, as the last aircraft carrier of the old design, the "George Bush" belongs to the aircraft carrier in the transition to a new type of aircraft carrier, reflecting more of the latest technology, for example, it has more advanced radar and navigation instruments, cables and antennas are built-in, so as to highlight the stealth; It has a higher degree of automated management, and the food loaded on the ship can be used by the entire ship's 6,000 officers and men for 90 days.

In fact, this statement is wrong, the US aircraft carrier aircraft is generally configured according to the establishment requirements rather than the maximum capacity, and generally leaves a lot of leeway, not to mention the nuclear-powered aircraft carriers with basically the same organization, and the carrier aircraft capacity is actually about the same.

In fact, it is not the latest most, the CVN-21 aircraft carrier is not as good as the "Nimitz" class, the "Nimitz" usually has a capacity of 80-90 aircraft, plus 20-30 spare aircraft, that is to say, the maximum aircraft capacity of the "Nimitz" class can reach 120 aircraft, of course, this is an inefficient thing.

CVN-76 USS Reagan The CVN-77 USS Bush generally carries 70 to 80 carrier-based aircraft of various types, and can carry up to 100 aircraft.

Certainly not the Bush. At present, the standard configuration of Nimitz is two squadrons of fighters, plus early warning aircraft, ***, anti-submarine aircraft, etc., a total of 60-70 aircraft, and any more will affect the scheduling.

If you only look at the number, the aircraft carrier with the largest number of carriers should be the Essex class of World War II (theoretically Shinano is the most, but that one sank before it was put into service), but it is impossible to determine the specific name of the ship.

The specific number of aircraft carriers on board changes at any time, and it is impossible to count the exact number of carriers, so we can only say the model but not the name of the ship.

There are also anti-submarine aircraft and electronic warfare aircraft.

F-18 is the main force.,Although multi-purpose is the trend.,But I still like F14.。。 The original classification of carrier aircraft is specialized in the industry, and the heavy body gives people a sense of security.

F14 is too uneconomical.,It's inevitable to be replaced.,F18 people feel that they have to serve at least 30 years later.,A 7,S-3A、EA-6B's jobs have been robbed of it.,Unitary economy.,Otherwise, the United States can't do this, right?,It's not a good thing for military fans.,A single deck,It's uncomfortable to watch.。。

I don't like modern warships, they are ugly and unaesthetic, battleships are the king of aesthetics, and of course, aircraft carriers full of all kinds of fighters are even more beautiful.

Fighters are: F18, F35B C, A6 electronic warfare attack aircraftAWACS: E3 folding wing AWACS.

: Sea Hawk folding rotors***.

1. There are 91 carrier-based aircraft of the "Akagi" (16 Type 96 fighters, 51 Type 96 attack aircraft, and 24 Type 96 dive bombers).

2. There are 90 carrier-based aircraft (15 Type 90 fighters, 45 Type 89 attack aircraft and 30 Type 94 dive bombers).

3. "Longxiang" has 18 Type 96 fighters and 12 Type 97 attack aircraft. During the Second Battle of the Solomons, the "Longxiang" carried 24 "Zero" fighters and 9 Type 97 attack aircraft.

4. "Canglong" and "Feilong" are of the same level, and 72 aircraft can be used, of which "Canglong" actually carries 57 aircraft (21 "Zero" fighters, 18 Type 97 attack aircraft, and 18 Type 99 dive bombers).

There are 63 actual carrier-based aircraft, 21 Zero, 21 Type 99 dive bombers, and 21 Type 97 attack aircraft.

5. The "Xianghe" class aircraft carriers include the "Xianghe" and "Zuihe", which can carry 84 aircraft, 21 actual zero combat, 30 99 ship explosions, and 30 97 ship attack planes.

6. The "Xiangfeng" class aircraft carriers include the "Xiangfeng" and "Ruifeng", which can carry 28 aircraft (6 "Zero" fighters, 12 Type 97 attack aircraft and 10 Type 99 dive bombers).

7. "Dragon Phoenix" can carry 21 fighters and 9 attack aircraft.

8. The "Big Eagle" class aircraft carriers, including the "Inuhawk," "Cloud Eagle," and "Chongying," can only serve as a platform for the transport fleet, escort the convoy, or serve as a platform for transport aircraft, and all of them have participated in more famous battles.

9. The "Falcon Eagle" class aircraft carriers include the "Falcon Eagle" and the "Flying Eagle", which can carry 53 aircraft. Among them, there are actually 51 "Flying Eagles" (Zero Combat 27, Ship Attack Tianshan 6, and Type 99 Ship Explosion 18), "Falcon Eagle" 51 (39 for the first time, 20 Zero fighters, and 19 Type 99 ship explosions; The second time was full, Zero 27 aircraft, 9 Type 99 ship explosion aircraft, and 9 Comet aircraft).

10. There are 61 "Dafeng" planes, including 19 "Gale" fighters, 6 "Caiyun" reconnaissance planes, and 36 "Meteor" attack planes.

11. The planes carried by the "Shinano" itself were not intended to be used for attack missions, but only for their own escort, so the number of planes carried was not large, and it was planned to carry 38 "Gale" fighters, 18 "Meteor" attack planes, and 9 "Caiyun" reconnaissance planes, a total of 65 planes; It was then changed to 20 fighters and 27 dive bombers, for a total of 47 aircraft.

12. The "Chitose" class includes the "Chitose" and "Kanyoda", which can carry 21 fighters and 9 attack aircraft, a total of 30 aircraft.

13. The "Yunryu"-class aircraft carriers include the "Yunryu," "Amagi," "Katsuragi," "Kasaki," "Aso," and "Ikoma," and are planned to carry 20 fighters, 6 reconnaissance planes, and 27 dive bombers, totaling 53 aircraft. , but only the "Yunlong", "Amagi", and "Katsuragi" were actually completed.

Actually, it's not too much. In World War II, the United States produced the most Exeter-class aircraft carriers, while the modern Nimitz-class aircraft carriers can also be carried to the fullest. Of course, Exeter's displacement was only about a third of that of the Nimitz.

The reason why he was able to carry so many planes was because:

Propeller aircraft are small in size, light in weight, and occupy a small hangar and deck area;

The most important thing is that the take-off and landing distance of the propeller aircraft is short, and the distance required to glide on the deck is only a few tens of meters, and because he has no tail flame, he does not need to put a baffle behind him, and many planes can be arranged to take off intensively. At the same time, he needs a long glide distance, even if it is a catapult take-off, it is much longer than that of a propeller plane, so that his take-off takes up a lot of space, and he has to use a baffle to block the tail flame behind him, which not only occupies space, but also makes other planes can only wait far away.

So, if you watch the documentary collection, when the World War II aircraft carrier takes off the carrier-based aircraft, it is full of planes on the deck, and then takes off in turn, while the aircraft of the modern aircraft carrier can only have two planes ready to eject in the take-off area, while the other planes can only line up far away in the waiting area.

Aircraft during World War II were generally much lighter than they are today, such as the Avenger torpedo machine, which was only 3 tons. And the current carrier-based aircraft, such as the F18, weigh fifteen or sixteen tons. It is about 5 times heavier than World War II.

The displacement of aircraft carriers has increased by 2 to 3 times compared with aircraft carriers during World War II. Therefore, the number of carrier-based aircraft carried is naturally much less.

Because the fighters carried on modern aircraft carriers carry more ammunition and the total amount is heavy, they were mass-produced during World War II, and aircraft were no exception.

Didn't you notice that the current fighter jets are much larger than the fighters of World War II, and the required maintenance data must also be kept on the aircraft carrier to ensure timely use, which takes up a lot of space.

The propeller aircraft carried by World War II aircraft carriers were smaller and heavier than modern jets, and of course they were high in number, but they also had low combat effectiveness (performance and payload). And modern carrier-based jet fighters, faster, more firepower, better maneuvering, of course, heavier and larger, in terms of the number of natural carrier-based aircraft, modern aircraft carriers are significantly less.

At that time, the take-off weight of the aircraft was small and the protection facilities around the aircraft carrier were weak

There is no need to discuss the period of World War II. Modern aircraft carriers do not need to have as many fighters as a single aircraft carrier during World War II

Because the carrier-based aircraft of World War II were simple and lightweight.

The reasons for the small number of aircraft carried by the Kuznetsov aircraft carrier are roughly twofold:

First, the medium-sized aircraft carriers in the world today, such as the Nimitz-class of the United States and the Charles de Gaulle class of France, all use nuclear power, and their power systems occupy very little space in the ship, and a large number of cabins can be set below the hangar, so the hangar below the flight deck can be set up larger. And the Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier because it adopts a conventional power system, equipped with 4 steam turbines, not only its power compartment occupies a large amount of space in the ship, but also because it carries a large amount of fuel, so it needs to be equipped with a large fuel tank, and occupies a huge space in the ship, so that some cabins are forced to move up, and even encroach on the hangar space, in addition, due to the use of conventional power, the common power system also needs to be specially set up to penetrate the Hangar ventilation and smoke exhaust system, also occupies valuable hangar space.

Second, Russia's aircraft carrier design concept is completely different from that of Western countries, and Western countries led by the United States do not pay attention to the anti-ship air defense capability of aircraft carriers, and these functions are undertaken by other types of aircraft carrier formations, while the aircraft carrier itself is only equipped with a very small amount of light short-range air defense**, such as the United States Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, except for a small number of 6-barreled 20 mm Phalanx anti-aircraft guns or "Ram" short-range air defense missiles, there are no anti-ship and medium and long-range air defense weapons. In addition to carrier-based aircraft, the library ship is also equipped with 12 units of SS-N-19 anti-ship missile vertical launcher (12 pieces of ammunition Six-link SA-N-9 anti-aircraft missile vertical launcher (192 pieces of "Kashtan" (Kashtan) missile integrated close defense system, 4 AK-630 6-tube 30 mm anti-aircraft guns, 2 10-tube RBU 12000 anti-submarine rocket launchers, and these ** The system must be set up in the upper part of the hull, compared with the all-through hangar of the United States and France, you can imagine how much hangar space these ** systems need to occupy, so that the aircraft carrier will carry less aircraft?

As the owner said, the dismantling of all the depot ships will definitely increase the number of aircraft, but it will be difficult to reach more than 70.

The Kuznetsov class has a full load displacement of 58,500 tons, and the Forrestal class has such a standard displacement, and the transformed full load displacement exceeds 80,000 tons, which is not a tonnage class at all. In addition to the tonnage, the most important thing here is that Mao Zi does not understand the navy at all, does not know how to design aircraft carriers, and lacks the core technology of aircraft carriers. To put it simply, the glide take-off design adopted by Maozi is completely helpless, compared with the steam catapult, this method seriously limits the maximum take-off mass of the fighter, resulting in the actual combat effectiveness of the fighter approaching 0, and it also takes up a lot of deck space.

The Soviets had poor carrier-based aircraft technology, and the modified Su33 took up a large deck area, which led to the final tragic number of carriers, and there was no possibility of improvement.