The origin of humanity and the origin of civilization, what did human civilization originate from?

It seems that you have to write a Marxist-Leninist article like "Labor creates man", right?

In fact, this statement is very reasonable, you can start with labor, cooperation, engaging in production, and because of the need for cooperative production, language is produced, and then writing and civilization are produced, and animals also have to hunt, or even cooperative hunting, but that is by no means production. This is the origin of humanity.

The origin of civilization comes from language and writing, recording daily information, and then on daily necessities and architecture, art is derived on a practical basis, and then there are beliefs, religions, etc., which can be summarized as "man created God, not God created man".

Note, however, that Homo erectus, such as Peking Man, is not our direct ancestor, and we are not their descendants. Our ancestors traveled from Africa to other continents 10-150,000 years ago, when the Peking Man was probably extinct in Asia.

The origin of human beings is the result of natural selection and the creation of nature.

The origin of civilization is the gradual development of human beings from the first paleolithic tools in order to survive.

Tools facilitate the development of the human brain, and thus human beings evolve.

I suggest you take a look at the first few chapters of the General History of the World, which are very detailed.

I hate Jian Xiaoqing -

Disgusting questions.

Agree to ls. It's a disgusting question. I can't stand it anymore. Jian Xiaoqing always gets some of these things.

Human Origins: Since Darwin founded the theory of biological evolution, most people believe that humans are the product of biological evolution, and that modern humans and modern apes share a common ancestor. In ancient times, the origins of human societies on various continents diverged.

The early domestication of wild plants in China, Central America, the southeastern United States, and other regions gave the various groups in these regions a head start. Why wheat and corn, cattle and pigs, and some of the other amazing crops and livestock of the modern world are present in these particular regions and not in others. People's understanding of this issue is still vague and vague.

As for the origin of Chinese civilization, Western scholars have always believed that it was 3,000 years ago according to their standards, and although Chinese scholars have disagreed, they have not been able to prove this view wrong. The latest research results of Hongshan cultural relics and the definition of civilization standards can prove that Chinese civilization originated 8,000 years ago.

The origin of human civilization includes two types: the materialized form element as the standard and the social form element as the standard. Materialized morphological elements such as writing, cities, bronzes, and complex ceremonial centers also imply social morphological factors, especially cities. The elements of social formation, such as private ownership, class and state organization, basically belong to the category of superstructure, but they are often expressed in a certain degree of materialization.

The status and role of these two elements in the study are different: the materialized morphological elements are the first level of the study of the origin of civilization, and they are the low-level and the most basic research process. The elements of social form, including private ownership, class and state, are the second level of the study of the elements of the origin of civilization, and belong to the higher level of research content.

Therefore, in the question of the origin of civilization, it is necessary to organically combine the elements of materialized form with the elements of social form.

The materialized morphological elements are low-level elements in the study of the origin of civilization, and it seems that they should not be used as the standard for the origin and formation of civilization, but can only be an important sign or indicator of the origin and formation of civilization. As a higher-level research element of the origin of civilization, the element of social form mainly refers to the origin and formation process of private ownership, class and state, so it seems reasonable to take the birth of private ownership, class and state as the criterion for the formation of civilization.