Acknowledging the point of view of movement, is it the point of view of dialectics?

Updated on culture 2024-05-27
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    This is one-sided.

    The fundamental property of matter is motion. Movement is the philosophical category that marks the change of all things and phenomena and their processes. The motion of the material world is absolute, and matter has a certain relative stillness in the process of motion.

    Movement and stillness are interdependent, interpenetrating, and mutually containing, "there is stillness in movement, and there is movement in stillness". The unconditional absolute motion and the conditional relative rest constitute the relationship of the unity of opposites.

    Dialectics. It is the recognition of the absoluteness of motion and the relativity of rest.

    Metaphysics. Nor is it that motion is not recognized, such as mechanical motion.

    Metaphysics is recognized.

    Therefore, the view that "the view of acknowledging movement is dialectic" is one-sided.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The view of acknowledging movement is not the whole point of dialectics. The reason is that motion is only part of the dialectic of the description of the state of things. Dialectics, on the other hand, deals not only with the state of things, but also with the nature of things.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Hello, I am glad to answer for you: according to the basic point of view of dialectics, it is the unity of opposites that change, also known as the unity of opposites and the law of struggle. It reveals the characteristics of objective existence (nature, human society, human thinking, etc.), all of which contain inherent contradictions, and are all the unity of contradictions. The internal contradictions of things are the source and driving force of the development and change of things, and promote the development of things.

    The law of mutual change of quality and quality reveals that things are caused by contradictions. The characteristics of the development process and state, and the form of development and change, start from quantitative change, and qualitative change is the end of quantitative change. The negation of negation reveals that the process of contradictory movement has the characteristics of orange wide search, and it tells people that contradictory movement is the manifestation of vitality, and its characteristic is self-denial and transformation into opposites.

    Therefore, the law of negation of negation constitutes the essence of dialectical movement. In the law of affirmation and negation, the focus is on the law of negation of negation.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The dialectical movement of practice and cognition is a dialectical development process from perceptual cognition to rational cognition, and is a dialectical development process of practice, cognition, re-practice, and re-cognition, which goes on and on and on.

    The cycle of practice, understanding, re-practice, and re-understanding goes on and on and on until it is endless, and the content of each cycle of practice and understanding has advanced to a higher level comparatively." This is the basic process of the development of the dialectical movement of cognition, and it is also the general law of the movement of cognition, which shows that cognition is a process of repeated cycles and infinite development.

    In this process, the contradiction between subjectivity and objectivity, between understanding and practice, is the basic contradiction, which runs through the entire movement of understanding and promotes the development of the entire movement of understanding.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    From the point of view of the process of practice, the process of human practice is the process of practice, understanding, and practice. It is itself a process that encompasses a movement of negation.

    From the point of view of the antagonistic and unified relationship between man and nature, man is an existence derived from nature, and all human needs need to be met by nature. But nature cannot meet all the needs of man, so in the process, man is constantly reshaping the world. The act itself is dialectically developed.

    1. Practice is the first to know.

    Awareness can be gained through one's own hands-on experience or from others, so there are many ways. But all of them are ultimately acquired through practice, so practice is the only thing to know.

    2. The practice of carrying lead is the driving force for the development of understanding.

    After understanding the generation of understanding, what is the impetus for understanding and how it develops, this is the content of this knowledge point. Through practice, new needs will be generated, new material means of research will be provided, and the development of understanding will be promoted.

    For example, at first, it was thought that life was created by God, but through the practical research of new material means microscopes, it was discovered that the basic unit of life is the cell. This shows that practice provides new material means to promote the development of understanding. In addition, practice can also improve one's thinking ability.

    to promote the improvement of people's cognitive ability.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    In the dialectical movement of practice and cognition, subjectivity must be unified with objectivity, and understanding must be unified with practice.

    In the dialectical movement of practice and cognition, subjectivity must be unified with objectivity, and understanding must be unified with practice. This unity is the unity of the contradiction between knowledge and practice in the process of development, which is (a).

    a Unity of subjectivity and objectivity.

    b Unity of history and logic.

    c Unity of truth and value.

    d Concrete historical unity.

    The process of the dialectical movement of practice and cognition:

    1. The dialectical movement of practice and cognition is a leap from perceptual to rational cognition, and from rational cognition to practice.

    2. From practice to understanding, and then from understanding to practice, the dialectical movement process of people's understanding of concrete things has been realized.

    After two leaps, the movement of practice and understanding has been completed and not completed. To say that it is "finished" is to refer to the knowledge of specific things; To say that it is "not yet complete" is to refer to the forward and forward development of the process of practice and understanding movement.

    3. In the dialectical movement of practice and cognition, subjectivity must be unified with objectivity, and understanding must be unified with practice. This kind of unity is the unity of the contradiction between understanding and practice, the unity of the simple model in the course of development, and the unity of concrete history.

    The dialectical relationship between perceptual and rational cognition:

    1. Perceptual understanding needs to be developed and deepened into rational understanding.

    2. Rational cognition depends on perceptual cognition.

    3. Perceptual cognition and rational cognition are mutually inclusive and interpenetrating. Perceptual cognition and rational cognition are dialectically unified, and the basis of unity is practice. If we sever the dialectical unity between the two, we will move toward theoretical and empiricism, and we will make the mistake of dogmatism or empiricism in practical work.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The movement of understanding is a process of development of the first evidence of hunger: from practice to understanding, from understanding to practice, practice, understanding, re-practice, and re-understanding, the movement of understanding is constantly and repeatedly and infinitely developing.

    1) From practice to cognition, the dialectical process of the movement of cognition is, first of all, the process from practice to cognition. In this process, cognition has taken two forms: perceptual and rational cognition, and has experienced an active leap from the former to the latter.

    2) From recognition to practice, it is the second active leap in the process of understanding. The purpose of knowing the world is to transform it. To achieve this goal, the guidance of scientific theories is needed.

    Theory is the guide to action, and without revolutionary theory there can be no revolutionary movement, and without correct theory there can be no correct action. Only under the guidance of correct ideology and theory can we consciously achieve the goal of transforming the world.

    3) The continuous repetition and infinite development of the cognitive movement, from practice to understanding, and then from understanding to practice, and so on,

    As the general process of the development of cognition, it is not only a synthesis of many leaps from practice to cognition and cognition to practice, but also shows the repetition and infinity of the process of cognition. The repetition and infinity of the cognitive process refer to the fact that people's cognitive process is neither a closed cycle nor a straight line forward, but a spiral zigzag upward movement. This movement, in terms of form, is manifested as a repeated cycle of knowledge and practice; From the point of view of content, each cycle of practice and understanding has advanced to a higher level.

    It is precisely this cyclical and infinite development of practice and understanding in the movement of understanding that embodies the essence of understanding and the general law of development.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Dialectics holds that everything is in motion, undisturbed and unchanging, and there is no immutable eternal essence. From a macro perspective, everything is constantly evolving, evolving, and changing. From a microscopic point of view, there are microscopic particles and forces that are endlessly changing and mutating within matter.

    In dialectical epistemology, the movement and change of the material world is the premise, the foundation, and the source, and it is also the core of the construction of the dialectical theoretical system.

    According to the basic view of dialectics, for any thing, it is not static, but in an eternal motion and change. In this eternal movement and change, there is a constant struggle of contradictions within things, and this contradiction promotes the development, change and progress of things. Therefore, movement is one of the fundamental ideas of dialectics, pointing out the essence of the ever-changing development of all things.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The general characteristic of dialectics is the development of connections, and the essence and core of dialectics are contradictions.

    Therefore, movement is inseparable, motion and matter are inseparable, movement is inseparable from stillness, movement is inseparable from movement, movement is inseparable from contradiction.

Related questions
4 answers2024-05-27

When looking at anything, we should adhere to the dialectical point of view.

1 answers2024-05-27

Matter is the "common name" of all things that mark objective reality, such as the atom of physics, the molecule of chemistry, the cell of biology, the commodity of economics, the physical evidence of law, and so on. >>>More

11 answers2024-05-27

I think the key to you is not what materialism is, what is idealism, but what are the three laws, which should be paid attention to, what are the three laws, which is the fundamental, for you, it is the materialist position (of course, in the case that you follow the three laws in parallel), (the three laws themselves do not have a position, you have to know what the laws are).

9 answers2024-05-27

First of all, we must know that external conditions are required for quantitative change to qualitative change. Not having such conditions is empty talk. For example, atomic decay is due to the action of magnetic resonance. >>>More

9 answers2024-05-27

1 This is a paradigm difference.

2 The question of who revolves around whom, who moves and who does not move, the earth and the sun, depends on different astronomical theoretical frameworks, i.e., different paradigms (Kuhn's concept).The difference between Tycho and Kepler is a concrete example of the transition from the geocentric paradigm to the heliocentric paradigm. >>>More