If you want to sell cameras, you are entangled between DSLR and mirrorless

Most mirrorless and SLR coms are the same size, so for home, travel, and girls, of course, light weight is the mainstay. You can buy Sony A5000 These sets, within 5000, the advantage of Sony mirrorless is that it is easy to transfer, high playability, and you can use a variety of SLR lenses. If you want to look more retro, Fujifilm X-M1, Fujifilm's tone is also quite retro.

The card machine is also good.。。 The key is what exactly is the disappointment you are talking about,,, so you can say it.

In general, the difference between SLR and mirrorless is that SLR sacrifices portability and has high control; Mirrorless is advantageous for portability, but the handling is weaker. In terms of weight, SLR is equivalent to gaining 1 kilogram, which is 2 catties. Mirrorless is lighter and more convenient.

In terms of image quality, what you look at is the lens, if the SLR and the mirrorless are all set lenses, then the image quality will not be too different, but if the prime lens is taken into account, under the same budget, the mirrorless has the possibility of surpassing the SLR.

In terms of effect, it is the result of the addition of equipment image quality and photographer's technology (including shooting technology and post-retouching), so the DSLR is selected if the image quality is emphasized, and the micro-SLR is selected if the image quality is emphasized. In addition, there is no flash in the mirrorless, focusing is more troublesome, the mirrorless is more power-consuming, shooting, browsing, framing all need to use the screen, and the screen is very power-consuming, a dry battery will soon run out of power, but the SLR is more power-efficient.

If you take a camera for home use and record life, mirrorless is more suitable than SLR. If you really have a hobby for photography, a DSLR is more suitable. Because although it is heavy, it is valuable.

The micro mirrors at the price you mentioned are slightly better than the SLR at the same price. Mirrorless bar, enough for home use, but also lightweight, easy to operate. If the daughter-in-law likes it, buy a Pentax for the daughter-in-law, there are good-looking colors, but ** is a little more expensive, more than 5,000.

That's not something that can be compared. Hope it helps.

Buying a micro order, home is easy to carry and burning money, and not buying a good lens is also.

First of all, I recommend the model.,The owner said that Panasonic's micro mirror is DMC-GF2GK (hereinafter referred to as GF2).。 This camera is cost-effective, lightweight and easy to carry, and easy to operate. 28mm wide-angle 8x optical zoom Leica DC lens with inch Smart Touch LCD.

1.Changing lenses is a body that can be matched with different lenses. The current factory-configured lens has a biscuit lens and a zoom long lens. Easy to replace, anyone who hasn't studied photography can easily change lenses in a matter of seconds.

3.It is very convenient to take photos and videos, and the menu mode is simple and easy to understand, so even the layman can operate and set it intuitively. There are two features:

1) Use"Fuzzy control"function, you can easily recall the wonderful bokeh effect that only DSLR cameras can achieve with just a touch of the touch. Just touch the screen against the subject, and the focus and brightness adjustment will be done automatically and quickly.

4.The imaging effect can be comparable to that of a DSLR, and blur and capture are all no problem. There are a lot of posts on the forum that were shot with Panasonic GF2, and you can go up and see what others have taken. Look** is the most convincing.

5.Panasonic's mirrorless models currently only have DMC-GF1GK and DMC-GF2GK, GF2 has more complete functions, and it is also a more popular model recently.

Finally, I also use this camera, so I know this camera very well, which is really good!!

The first question: the interchangeable lens means that the body and the lens are separated, and the lens can be changed according to your different needs, and the appearance is only smaller than that of the SLR.

The second problem: now the micro-mirror is equipped with a standard head, and the third problem is more than 4000: convenience Even professional SLR cameras have a fully automatic fourth problem: the imaging effect is between the card machine and the SLR.

The fifth question: Panasonic's current GF2 is good The lens is used to card the final persuasion It's best not to buy a mirrorless, unless you like its shape The mirrorless imaging effect is not as good as that of a SLR, but the price is not much different from the entry-level SLR. Moreover, there are few mirrorless lenses, so there is little room for choice.

If you really want to buy a camera, or if you have a budget, it is recommended to buy a Canon 550D or 600D

This camera is very cost-effective, cheap and sufficient, and very easy to operate.

1 Changing the lens is a body, which can be matched with different lenses, and you can change the lens like a SLR, but it is not as large as a SLR. But now there are not many options for mirrorless lenses.

2 **In terms of **, the NEX-5 domestic sales are all with 18-55 lenses, **at about 4500 yuan.

3 It's very simple to take pictures, one-click video, 4 The ** quality of the shot should still be okay, but there may not be a SLR, okay5I don't know about Panasonic, but I feel that Sony's NEX-5 will be better.

Micro mirrorless is not recommended, the market is still very immature, the landlord is still good to buy a single reflex, Canon 60D with 18-135 lens is recommended, and it is very cost-effective.

The improvement in photo quality is limited, so you either buy a DSLR or use digital. Now only a few companies have microelectronics, Samsung uses Pentax technology, and Olympus also has it. I don't see that the quality of my classmates' photos has improved as much as **.

Panasonic's products are still okay in terms of quality ** There are many lines.

It's something to think about, and everybody thinks differently.

I like the GF2 white one, it's very powerful.

Don't be entangled, just amateur play, if you don't want to turn it into a demanding professional-level hobby, half an APS mirrorless can be; Moreover, mirrorless can be captured, and some are even more convenient.

Compared with the SLR, the advantage of the half-frame mirrorless is that it is lightweight, which is actually very important for tourists, especially those who always want to hang the camera with them. Capturing is just a matter of focusing settings, and it is not difficult to become proficient.

One of the relative disadvantages of mirrorless is that there are not many lenses, and the head of the direct or transfer to the SLR is too bulky. The other is that there is no small volume of replaceable head mirrorless mirrorless with full width (there will be one in the future), but not many entry-level and intermediate SLRs are half width.

To be comfortable to use, of course, it is a mirrorless.

The difference between mirrorless and SLR has finally been understood.

It's definitely a DSLR. If portability is considered, it is mirrorless.

SLR is good, SLR is the principle of Wuling mirror, the picture quality is clear, the mirrorless comparison consumes power, the style is novel, and it is small and suitable for girls.

For the purpose of buying the machine, it is to take pictures or something, a micro mirror is far enough, I don't know what micro mirror you are looking at, but now Samsung and Sony out of the ** micro mirror is not very expensive, but the shooting effect is usually good. The operation is simple and convenient, stylish and portable. But the SLR is different, the real SLR is more than 5000, but the 5000 SLR is really not good, the SLR is not easy to carry, and the operation is troublesome.

The SLR is better, and the picture quality is very clear.

First, the appearance of contrast.

First, compare the volume appearance of the two. Compared with mirrorless cameras, card players are smaller in size and more convenient to carry. Compared with the "pocket machine" card machine, such as Sony's black card series card machine, the volume of the mirrorless camera is a bit large, but in terms of appearance design, the mirrorless camera is more fashionable and highlights the literary and artistic style, while the quasi-professional card machine with a large-size sensor mostly adopts a black body design.

2. Performance comparison.

Digital cameras** are gradually becoming popular, and there are more and more people who buy mirrorless and quasi-professional card machines, and the performance ratio is a major criterion for purchasing cameras. In terms of image quality, I think mirrorless cameras are better, most mirrorless cameras use APS-C sensors, and there are even full-frame models to choose from. In terms of function, the function of the card machine is relatively simple, which is more suitable for family users and individual users for entertainment; Mirrorless cameras are designed with richer functions, more buttons, and many professional functions that are not available in card cameras, making them suitable for professionals who have a strong interest in photography. To sum up, mirrorless cameras are more professional, while card players are more suitable for everyday users.

3. Picture quality performance.

The pursuit of high image quality has become a trend, and mirrorless and card players cannot be avoided. Among the cameras currently on sale, the mainstream cameras are designed with a sensor of more than 20 million pixels, which has a picture quality performance that is not inferior to ordinary entry-level or even mid-range SLR, and the card machine is easier to shoot beautifully. Background bokeh effect.

But in terms of image quality imaging, mirrorless cameras are superior. As we all know, image quality performance is directly proportional to the size of the image sensor, and mirrorless cameras mostly use APS-C format design, which has better image quality performance than the 1-inch CMOS card players used by most quasi-professional DCs. However, as far as ordinary home users are concerned, the card player is enough for ** shooting performance, while the mirrorless camera is more suitable for professional photography enthusiasts.

Comparison of sensor size area (the larger the size, the higher the image quality).

Fourth, lens selection.

If you want to have a good time photography, the lens is an indispensable piece of equipment. The card player is a non-interchangeable lens camera, which is more suitable for home users or ordinary users as far as the photography crowd is concerned. The mirrorless camera is an interchangeable lens camera, and it has an ultra-short flange distance, which can obtain a rich group of SLR lenses with only one adapter ring, which is suitable for professional photography enthusiasts.

Summary. In general, mirrorless cameras have better performance and better image quality, which is more suitable for professional photography enthusiasts. Of course, if you are a home user or an ordinary photography enthusiast, and the demand for camera performance is not so professional, it is still very good to choose a card machine, which is not expensive, and can also shoot a beautiful background bokeh effect. Finally, I will recommend a few popular mirrorless and card machines of about 4,000 yuan for everyone, hoping to help everyone's purchase.

For novice photographers, there are some factors and reasons to consider when choosing whether to buy a mirrorless or SLR camera for the first camera. Here are some points worth considering:

1.Quality and camera performance: DSLRs typically have larger faux-action sensors and higher pixels, which can deliver higher quality and better image detail.

They typically have a wider dynamic range and better low-light performance, making them ideal for situations that require high quality**, such as professional photography and printing. However, mirrorless cameras are also advancing, and some high-end mirrorless cameras have been able to provide image quality close to that of DSLRs.

2.Portability and lightweight: In contrast, mirrorless cameras are typically smaller and lighter than DSLRs.

They are more suitable for daily carrying and travel in terms of size and weight, and are suitable for photography enthusiasts who need portability. If you're more concerned about portability and convenience, then a mirrorless camera may be a better choice.

3.Ease of operation: Mirrorless cameras usually have a more simplified interface and menus, making them suitable for beginners and novice photographers.

They offer more intuitive and easy-to-use features that are easier for beginners to get started with. DSLR cameras are more focused on manual control and more operating options, making them suitable for those who prefer to learn photography in depth.

4.Lens selection and system development: DSLR cameras have a wider selection of lenses and better system support.

This means that you can choose different types of lenses according to your needs and interests, and you can upgrade or change the camera body if you need to. Mirrorless cameras may be relatively small in terms of lens selection and system development, but they are also growing and evolving.

5.Budget and economic factors: DSLR cameras are usually more expensive than mirrorless cameras, especially high-end models.

Mirrorless cameras may be more affordable in some segments and are suitable for those who are on a budget. However, it also depends on the specific brand, model, and features.

To sum up, the choice of whether to buy a mirrorless or DSLR camera depends on your personal needs, preferences, and budget. If you're focused on quality and photographic performance, and you're interested in more manual control and lens selection, a DSLR camera might be the better choice. If you're more concerned about portability, ease of operation, and economy, then a mirrorless camera might be a better fit for you.

It's important to carefully research and compare different brands and models of cameras before making a purchase, and to consider your own photography needs and goals.