Does the Canon D3000 have to be better than the card

You are a beginner, so worry about what the lens motor is doing Nikon's new lenses are all AF-S lenses are all with motors You won't use the old lenses D3000 No matter what, this is better than the card machine It's a completely different thing If you consider playing SLR, you can get into a D3000 to practice first I have a friend in the team who is like this Slowly upgrade in the future As for what lens to change in the future, wait for you to play for a while, and then talk about it You are just getting started now I don't know anything You are confused when you say it, so I said that I played for a while and waited for the door You know it yourself.

Nikon D3000 SLR camera and other card machines are completely different concepts, the image sensor is larger than all card machines, the imaging principle is different, the picture quality is a qualitative leap, can be controlled strongly, D3000 is the most cost-effective single-lens reflex camera in the Nikon family, 09 years of products, you now buy a second-hand condition will not be much worse, than its higher price card machine is more powerful. Now the new machine on the Internet ** set (that is, with 18-55 lens) is about 2200-2300, and there are no other accessories. 2000 yuan to buy a new machine is a bit hanging, you consult clearly.

It depends on what it refers to, and the picture quality must be good.

This ** is normal, the price of a single machine, the last dog head practice, it is about 2500.

The image quality of the large-format output is certainly better than that of the card, but it is not as light and convenient as the card.

Let's put it this way, SLRs are used for creation, and cards are used for recording.

The difference is big, it's not a model, it's not a brand, and the most important thing is that Canon 1300D is an ancestral CMOS to get back the residual value of the product, and it has been given up**, Nikon D3400 is a work that keeps up with the front line, and the low-end camera Nikon is still insisting.

The Canon 600D and the Nikon 3100 are basically the same, depending on what you like!

The parameters of the 600D are a little better, but it still depends on your own preferences, you can try the effect of the photos taken by these two machines, or go to the forum to find out.

Actually, both cameras are good, depending on personal preference, I personally prefer the 600D

The quality of the image is directly related to the shooting light, environment, time, lens quality, and personal skills. Among them, the lens plays a decisive role in the quality of the picture.

Nikon's lens is very good, the resolution of the lens is high, so the resulting picture is very sharp (that is, the clarity is very high), Nikon's sensor (coms) is Sony's, the noise reduction function is good, and the color reproduction is beautiful.

Canon is obviously inferior in terms of lenses, because C lenses can't achieve high resolution (high-end lenses can't do it), so they can only vigorously promote how soft the image quality of its film is, how suitable for portraits, etc., and publicize the shortcomings as advantages.

Nikon's production rate is very high, and it is rare to hear of anyone who uses Nikon's ** to do a lot of post-production work; Canon, it's hard to say, in short, after using Canon, personal PS technology will definitely improve

In short, playing SLR is actually playing with the lens, how to distinguish the advantages and disadvantages of the lens? The professional opinion of an optical professional is the resolution of the lens (in this case, the microscope).

In terms of picture quality, from a non-professional point of view, there is no difference at all!

The so-called color preference, shoot in RAW format, and all can be adjusted in post-production!

The key depends on the convenience of the facts, the lens group, and personal technology, I have tried D3100, 500D has also played a few times, if you want to sell the machine, you may wish to add some money, 550D or D90 can be a higher level.

The positioning of the two cameras is about the same, and so is the positioning.

In fact, there is no question of who has good picture quality and who has poor picture quality, depending on personal love, Canon's picture quality is softer, and it is more suitable for portraits; Nikon's image quality is sharper, making it more suitable for shooting landscapes.

The other thing is that the Nikon handles a little better.