There are no accidents in the universe, is it like this, don t you believe it?

When I was studying classical physics in high school, I used to believe that everything in the universe could be calculated, and according to Newton's 3 law, knowing the state of motion at a certain moment, it could be calculated forward or backward.

But now I don't believe it for two reasons: 1. According to the theory of relativity, Newton's laws are not exact.

2. According to the butterfly effect, the small error of the current state of motion that we measure will make ** meaningless, but the measured data cannot be equal to the true value, so the future cannot be calculated.

If there are no accidents in the universe, there will be no now.

With the current level of human cognition, it is still very difficult to make a clear description of the nature and form of life within the space of the universe. Different environments will give birth to different species and different life forms. At present, the definition of life and the understanding of life forms are only limited to the environment on the earth, so our exploration of extraterrestrial life can only be based on life on earth.

The emergence of life in the universe is not an accident to some extent, but it is not luck, it is the mechanism of the entire universe that determines our life, so we may not be born by accident.

Galaxies form a system, planets form galaxies, all life is tied to the body of the universe, what do you do, the consciousness of the universe is known, the universe is conscious, life is produced under the movement of the universe, everything in the world is conscious, according to the current scientific deduction, it is unconscious, because now science, after the discovery of the research, the undiscoverable matter, than the discovery of countless times, modern science is to take such a route, is imperfect, but we have to be optimistic.

The expression process of autotrophic photosynthesis in the plant circle is essentially the process of conversion from inorganic matter to organic matter, and it is also a performance process of continuous production of organic carbohydrates. First of all, we need to understand what consciousness is. Materialism believes that consciousness is the reaction of matter in the human brain, so this defines the object of consciousness, therefore, the universe does not have consciousness, but in the same way, consciousness does not have uniqueness, it is just a physical phenomenon similar to a signal, and man is subordinate to the universe. And consciousness is subordinate to man.

Thus, the phenomenon of consciousness is not external to the universe.

What is the probability of life in the universe, first of all, the earth as a drop of water already has life and has developed into intelligent life, so the universe as the sea, there should be more than a drop of water on the earth to have life, so the probability that the entire universe should have life is very large.

It is the inevitable result of development, because there will be many conditions in the universe to give birth to life, so it is normal for life to appear.

It's an accident, the universe has a long history of existence, and no one knows what its beginning was.

1.Before the universe was gone, we (including the earth and the solar system) were long gone.

2.According to the current theory, the vast majority of people support Hawking's grand theory of the universe, that is, to satisfy the theoretical equation of dark matter in the universe (proposed by Einstein and explored for many years in his later years), the universe will retract to the origin, that is, the singularity.

3.Now the hardest thing to speculate and understand is, what is beyond the universe?

4.If time and space are unique to our universe, then there is no point in studying the environment outside the universe.

5.It is known that there is no point in studying the environment outside the universe, so the proposition of what would happen if the universe was lost is meaningless.

There is no universe without it, and what is black and rumbling is also the universe, and what is bright is also the universe. Whether the human beings on earth have nothing to do with the universe.

We will be overwhelmed by dark matter outside the universe, and then everything will disappear, or revert back to the original 'singularity''

Everybody is dead, and then in a few hundred years, there will be a new universe.

The question is deep.

Each of us is a particle of the universe. The universe is made up of us, the planets, the elements, and even time ... or other unknown things.

If a person dies, then he can no longer feel the "universe", but this is a contradiction with the above, because each of us is a small universe.

So how can this problem be explained? I'm dead, is the universe gone?

A piece of iron "knows it's in this universe?" I don't know. Because this piece of iron has no life, it doesn't know.

Therefore, we human beings are a slightly more advanced "small universe" in the universe, iron, soil, they are lower level small universes, they may not be conscious.

When we die, we become these low-level little universes, that is, there is no consciousness, but we still live in this universe, but we are not conscious.

I believe that this great universe is more advanced than us human beings, that is, it is alive, infinitely higher than us.

Therefore, the existence of the universe is not subject to human consciousness.

For you, everything will disappear, and for the universe, it may disappear, but the odds are very small.

If you think about it from the perspective of the butterfly effect, there is such a chance.

Yes, you won't be there the day the universe disappears.

No, the world is so big, there is no shortage of you.

And because people's perception is limited and they can't feel anything outside the visible light field, they should lose all their senses and have no perception. Therefore, one of the limitations of this problem is the perception ability of people, and the other is limited by probability, and two conditions need to take effect at the same time for this kind of thing to happen, one is that there are living people, but the universe disappears, if there is no probability of such a thing happening, the hypothetical result will have no practical meaning. Man is part of the universe, so this cannot happen.

Follow-up: You say that this is a limitation of human perception. In addition, there is a limit to probability, and there is no probability of happening, which has no practical significance.

Man is a part of the universe, and what is a part of the universe, planets such as humans and creatures, and billions of years later the sun will become a red giant, and eventually the solar system will become extinct. But everything has life and death, how does the universe come and go, the probability that it has not happened, and there are limits? Isn't there a contradiction in this statement?

Everything in the world has life and death. There is no exception to the universe. Isn't it?

And even if you don't admit this absolute statement that there are exceptions to everything, I have to add the following. The demise of the universe is predetermined, but the disappearance of space will bring about the disappearance of time, because space and time are equivalent, that is, time will terminate in an instant. Doesn't this explain the virtuality of the disappearance of space (the universe)?

Follow-up: I'm going to deny it here. It's not that I don't recognize my absolute, but that's what it is.

Not there are exceptions to everything. Is the Universe an Exception The demise of the universe should have been confirmed with ironclad, but it is not far from us. Have nothing to do with.

Space and time are equivalent, terminated in an instant, perhaps true. It's like an online game doesn't run anymore, it's virtual. Ended "life".

But you have left my subject. I asked. Yes (what).

You're talking about the impossible, real or virtual, I'm the questioner, you're the answerer, thank you for your answer. But you didn't answer the question. Maybe you're explaining the misunderstanding of my question.

But I want to ask what would it be if there was no universe? It's like a black hole, smaller than microbacteria. What is that.

Do you want to take an imaginary essay for elementary school students?