Is education abroad really good? Is it true that foreign education is more comprehensive?

Domestic education mainly focuses on textbook knowledge, but lacks relevant practical operation ability. In fact, a small number of elite education is practiced abroad, and the knowledge they learn in public schools is very limited, mainly skills education, as well as exercising hands-on ability.

Although their public schools abroad are free and easy to learn, they focus on developing skills and hands-on skills. The establishment of public schools is mainly to train industrial workers. It's like a technical school in China. Therefore, it is said that the education of a small number of elites is practiced abroad.

Foreign education is a sheep-herding education, focusing on social practice ability and hands-on ability. As for the textbook knowledge, it is very simple and easy to learn.

There is no question of which is better, each country has its own education system for its students. Although China's education has been criticized by many people, it is still standing.

If you want to learn advanced knowledge, you will be prepared to become an elite in society in the future. I also have to go to private education. Getting an education in a private school abroad is no less stressful than studying at home. Moreover, private schools are so expensive that the poor simply cannot afford them.

Most of their social elite come from private schools. However, the implementation of national elite education in China is greater, so I feel that the pressure of studying in China is greater than that abroad.

There are many people who envy foreign education and want to send their children to study abroad to gain knowledge; Of course, some people may just follow the trend and think that studying abroad is something worth showing off, but domestic education still has advantages.

Their public schools are only for the training of industrial workers. Personally, I think it's better to have education in China.

Which one is better, domestic education or foreign education? It's hard to compare! Each should have its own merits! Whether it is domestic education or foreign education, it has its own strengths and weaknesses.

As for practical and hands-on skills, domestic education has also begun to pay attention to it. Therefore, domestic and foreign are two different educational philosophies, and their division of labor is also different.

For our country, the main use is actually examination-oriented education, although examination-oriented education can obtain more talents more quickly to a certain extent, but the practical requirements for students are not so strict. We must understand that everyone must participate in the work of society in the future, so practical ability is very important for the future development of children.

For foreign education, in fact, it is more practice-oriented, foreign education can allow children to create value at a young age, and after creating value, they can obtain a certain income, which is actually a law of the whole society. <>

Foreign education is actually very helpful for economic development, Bill Gates, which we are familiar with, has founded a company before graduating, and Jobs is actually such a person, they pay more attention to practice, so there are more technology companies in the United States. <>

Although foreign education has greater advantages, I think that domestic education is also more suitable for ordinary people, because our country is just a developing country, although foreign education can obtain relatively good practical conditions, but our country's education is free, so that more people can receive education. <>

In fact, each type of education is suitable for its own national conditions, although our country adopts examination-oriented education, but our country's education is also constantly reforming, the purpose is to be able to improve the education level of ordinary people, so as to make the quality of this society higher.

Compared with domestic education and foreign education, I think China's education is better, the gap between urban and rural education levels is getting smaller and smaller, examination education is becoming more and more fair, and the popularization of vocational education promotes the rapid and harmonious development of society.

Domestic education is better, because domestic education teaches more knowledge, and domestic education can allow children to adapt to society as soon as possible.

Domestic education is because the implementation of nine-year compulsory education in the country, which can make more people afford to go to school, can improve the quality of the whole people, although it is an examination-oriented education, but it improves the learning ability and performance of students, and teachers are responsible.

Because in China, the vast majority of the selection system is still an examination component, including recruitment, admission to school, exceptional promotion, and technical titles, therefore, Chinese parents are also most concerned about test scores. The disadvantages of these aspects are that it is very likely to weaken the development of literacy, the ability to live and the improvement of social ideology. And this unity of broad ideas also makes Chinese children less polarized.

The educational philosophy in China is very different from that of the United States, and the essential difference is that China focuses on indoctrination education. Chinese students have a very solid foundation, which is also an advantage, but there are also shortcomings, Chinese students will always be afraid to deal with new things, compared with American students, the spirit of innovation is weaker, whether it is the professional learning report, design report or final exam of each course, Chinese universities pay more attention to whether the students' answers meet the "norms"; American universities, on the other hand, place more emphasis on practical activities and the ability to think creatively in the process of practical activities.

This is also the main difference between domestic education and Western education.

Domestic students often have an amazing level of memory and good basic mathematics, which is the main reason why Chinese students can achieve good results in Chinese test-taking education, but higher education in the United States requires students to participate, practice and cultivate, and many subjects are allocated time for case study and discussion, and students conduct student-oriented classroom teaching such as classic cases and explanations.

Teachers do not teach students face-to-face for a long time, about 30% of the time that students usually study. The rest of the time, students learn the basics through self-study, access to public libraries, and discussions with friends. In the process of participation and practice, students have improved their ability to solve problems through self-study and self-study.

Because they change from passive learning to active learning, their mentality is different, and the actual effect of learning will be very different.

We all know that Chinese culture and education are fundamental, especially in mathematics, and domestic children have strong math class ability and can leave overseas children a few streets. Mathematics is the foundation of higher education in all subjects, in fact, it is the foundation of the foundation, so it has received special attention from China's higher education. However, I don't know if you want to, from the value of knowledge reflection, basic knowledge is undoubtedly not as good as new knowledge, attaching great importance to basic knowledge is often easy to ignore the development of new knowledge, and the progress of people's civilization is often a reflection of the process of developing new knowledge.

Cultural education abroad does not pay much attention to basic knowledge, so it leaves a door for the development of new knowledge. The so-called basic knowledge learning is to summarize the experience accumulated in the past, mainly relying on logical judgment and memory to achieve, while the development of new knowledge requires imagination and multi-directional logical thinking ability to achieve, which is also the level required for subversive creation and invention.

In fact, this is the same as our children reporting good news and not bad news outside, for a long time I have heard that some outside education is good, and over time people mistakenly think that outside education is really good. In fact, no matter what kind of education it is, it has its drawbacks, and it cannot be perfect. Pay attention to scores and comprehensiveness in China, and pay attention to individualization abroad.

China's culture and education have a large number of relative examination components, which is also related to our basic national conditions. Because in China, most of the selection and distribution system is still a test component, including recruitment, admission, exceptional promotion, and technical titles, Chinese parents are most concerned about test scores. These disadvantages are that it may weaken the development of literacy, the improvement of life skills, and social ideology.

And this unity of broad concepts also makes Chinese children less polarized.

It is because there are more foreign talents, and they are also highly educated, in fact, there are generally junior colleges in China, and there are no junior colleges abroad.

This is really the case, foreign education generally focuses on the all-round development of a person's morality, intelligence, physical and aesthetics, but Chinese education is generally examination-oriented education.

Yes. They focus on the holistic development of a child, and some of their education systems are also very good.

Yes, and at every stage of children's growth, they often attach great importance to it, especially for some children's education in all aspects, and in this process, it is also cultivated for all aspects of children's thinking.

Yes, foreign education is diversified and all-encompassing, and their education methods are very good, which is worth learning from.

In the eyes of many people, foreign education is like this: there is a holiday every three or five days, school is released at three o'clock in the afternoon, classes are played games, and teachers love to encourage.

It seems that as long as the child completes something, he can get strong affirmation from the teacher.

Everyone thinks that studying abroad is too easy and simple.

However, the reality is exactly the opposite of what everyone imagined.

The competition of prestigious schools in the United States is no worse than that of our country, and if children do not go to tutorial classes, do not tutor their talents, and do not participate in social activities to enrich their resumes, then the possibility of children entering prestigious schools is almost zero.

In those seemingly happy primary and secondary schools, children really don't have to bear any pressure.

But this group of children has been happy for a few years, and they are stunned when they leave school.

Some will go to community colleges for a few years, and some will directly find low-level manual labor to support their lives, or get unemployment benefits, and wander the streets every day to waste their time.

The child's ability to work hard must be cultivated from an early age.

Only by solidifying the positive and uplifting good qualities of children will they be transformed into actions for society when they grow up.

Compared with domestic examination-oriented education, foreign education is indeed more comprehensive. There are many netizens who expressed their special envy for foreign students when they were very young, because the education received by foreign students is not as stressful as that of domestic students, on the contrary, most foreign education is very easy. Moreover, most of the education outside the country is to cultivate the independent personality of children, so foreign education involves more comprehensive things, so foreign education is not just rigid learning, on the contrary, it will also incorporate a lot of very entertaining elements.

Most domestic education will only teach some things and knowledge in children's textbooks and the expansion of knowledge, but in addition to these knowledge, foreign education will also teach children to play a variety of games and take children to understand various things. Foreign education is indeed more comprehensive for the cultivation of children, because after receiving foreign education, children will understand a lot of things at a very young age, and they will also understand a lot of things.

Children who have come out of domestic education have a very thorough understanding of this aspect of knowledge, but they do not have a special understanding of many things in society, so domestic children basically only know learning and some common things in life. However, I do not have a special understanding of the phenomena in this society, and I am not particularly clear about some things that exist in this society, which means that domestic education is indeed inferior to foreign countries in terms of comprehensive development.

However, it is not to be directly commented that domestic education is not good enough, on the contrary, domestic education is to connect students with this society, so that students can become the talents needed in this society. That is to say, foreign education is more inclined to personal development, while domestic education is more inclined to cultivate talents for the society, and the two are essentially different, so there is no need to compare or even step on the two types of education together.

I think foreign education is more comprehensive, because foreign education can make a person very attractive, it can also make a person become very qualified, and it can also make a person become very cultured, and it can also make a person become very connotative.

Foreign education is more comprehensive, because they actually don't pay much attention to academic performance, especially pay attention to all aspects of performance, and everyone's advantages are different. What I learned is that foreigners will pay special attention to the performance of sports, and they will also pay attention to the entertainment element, and I will only know how to study.

My understanding is that foreign education is very open, and it is also obviously different from the domestic field, and I appreciate the foreign education concept very much.

Foreign education is more comprehensive, and the education in Europe implements half-day morning study, and in the afternoon, the rented children are given some free time to do the activities they want to do, and the children can use this time to do physical exercise, or go to interest classes.