was reported to have eaten steamed buns at work and claimed 10,000 yuan from a colleague, what are t

Being reported for eating steamed buns during working hours and claiming 10,000 yuan from colleagues was a case of reputational damage that occurred in Laixi in September last year. The cause of the incident was an unpleasant incident between two colleagues, one of whom reported that Wang had eaten during work and had taken the food out of the cafeteria. The reported Wang believed that the content reported by Li was untrue and there was no evidence, which was an infringement of Wang's right to reputation, so that Wang could not face other colleagues and leaders in the company.

So Wang called the police and asked ** to intervene in the investigation of the matter, and finally after **'s investigation and mediation, Wang and Li finally reached an agreement and signed a settlement letter. The content of the settlement letter is to ask Li to publicly apologize to Wang, and after the company's general meeting discussed this matter, it was decided that Li would publicly apologize to Wang in the conference hall, so that Wang could save his face. <>

The reason why the claim of 10,000 yuan from Li happened happened after Li publicly apologized. Because after Li's public apology, Wang's heart was still unhappy, and this matter had always been a pimple in his heart, and it was difficult to pass, so he asked Li to compensate him for another 10,000 yuan for mental damages. But Wang had asked ** to help coordinate this matter before, and under the coordination of **, Li had fulfilled the content of the settlement letter, and the matter was already closed, and Li could not be punished repeatedly, because it was legally invalid, and in the end Wang did not get compensation from Li.

The main reason for this incident is that Li reported Wang's violation of company discipline without evidence, which caused a great reputational impact on Wang, and I think Wang's approach is really wrong. When the company's employees violate discipline, it should be dealt with by the leader, even when the leader deals with things, it is necessary to pay attention to real evidence, and Li has reported Wang many times without evidence, which is really undesirable.

The man was repeatedly reported by his colleagues in the company, saying that he ate steamed buns at work, but he thought that his colleagues did not have real evidence, so he asked his colleagues for mental damages.

A colleague reported that he was stealing steamed buns at work, and he was very angry, so he sued his colleague. Let a colleague apologize and compensate 10,000 yuan.

Because the relationship between the two was not good, Li reported to the company that Wang went to work to eat, Wang said that he had no evidence, and called the police on the grounds that his reputation was damaged, and the two reached a settlement after coordination with Li apologizing to Wang in public, and Wang was unwilling afterwards and wanted Li to compensate another 10,000 yuan. However, Li had reached a settlement and apologized to Wang, so Wang's claim for compensation was rejected.

Recently, the Laixi court heard a dispute over the right to reputation caused by steamed buns.

Mr. Wang and Mr. Li are colleagues in the company. According to the company's management regulations on "eating food in the manufacturing area is regarded as a minor disciplinary violation", September 2019,Li repeatedly reported that Wang took the steamed buns out of the canteen and ate them in the workplace

Wang believed that Li had violated his right to reputation by reporting many times without evidence, so he found Li to theorize, and the two sides quarreled, so Wang called the police and asked Li to be dealt with.

The two parties reached a public security mediation agreement under the mediation of the public security organs: "Li apologized to Wang, and Wang forgave Li; Li publicly apologized to Wang at the company's team meeting, explained the situation, and the chairman of the company's labor union presided over the meeting." Li explained the situation at the company's team meeting as agreed and apologized to Wang.

Originally, the "steamed bun incident" could have come to an end here, but Wang was not reconciled and thought that his losses had not been compensated, so he sued Li in court with a complaint, asking Li to apologize, eliminate the impact and compensate for mental losses of 10,000 yuan.

What happened to being reported to have eaten steamed buns at work and claimed 10,000 yuan from a colleague, this should be that you are eating steamed buns at work, and your colleague said that you were not convinced, you should have beaten him, and he should have spent seven or eight thousand or ten thousand yuan, so she was accompanied by 10,000 yuan with the consent of the unit leader.

It all sounds evil, but let's see the details later.

was reported to eat steamed buns at work and claimed 10,000 yuan from a colleague because there must be rules and regulations for going to work.

If you report eating steamed buns at work, you will have to pay 10,000 yuan, which is of course unreasonable. Isn't it just a report, and it won't cause such serious damage.

I don't think this claim is reasonable. The colleague has made a public apology to the person being reported, and the person accepted the apology, and he should not claim any more money.

It is reasonable that Wang believes that Li has violated his right to reputation by reporting many times without evidence, so he asked Li to theorize, and the two sides quarreled, and Wang called the police to ask for Li to be dealt with.

I don't think this claim is justified because the company already has a clear stipulation. It is not allowed to eat food in the work area, and under the mediation of the public security organs, a public security mediation agreement has been reached, and Li has apologized to Wang. And after Wang's forgiveness.

Therefore, it is completely unreasonable for him to claim 10,000 yuan.

I don't think it's reasonable. Eating steamed buns at work is not right in itself, and there is a mistake in the first place. There is no fault in the report of the colleague, and the person who is reported has no reason to claim compensation from others.

Is East China Medical University Gannan Medical University?

In September 2019, Li repeatedly reported that his colleague Wang took steamed buns out of the canteen and ate steamed buns at work. But their company rules do not allow them to eat at work. Wang believed that Li had reported himself many times without any evidence, so he theorized that Li had infringed on his right to reputation, and because he felt that his own losses had not been compensated, he sued Li in court.

On August 31, the Laixi court heard a case of a dispute over the right to reputation caused by steamed buns, in a certain company, Wang and Li, because the company they work for has a management rule, that is, employees are not allowed to eat food in the manufacturing area, otherwise they will commit a minor violation of discipline. Colleague Li repeatedly reported that Wang took the steamed buns out of the canteen, Wang felt that his right to reputation had been violated, so he went to his colleague Li to theorize, and the two people had a conflict and quarrel in the process of theory, and finally Wang called the police to report Li and asked to deal with Li.

Li reported that Wang took the steamed buns out of the canteen and ate them in the workplace. But there was no evidence, Wang called the police to deal with it, and later Li apologized to Wang, but Wang was not reconciled and sued Li in court, demanding compensation of 10,000 yuan for mental damages.

Someone has repeatedly reported that his colleague eats steamed buns during working hours without evidence, and the colleague also believes that he has seriously damaged his reputation, and hopes that the whistleblower can compensate him for 10,000 yuan for mental damages.

Colleagues repeatedly reported that the man brought steamed buns into the workplace to eat. The company rules did not allow food to be brought into the workplace, and the man felt that his colleague had no evidence, so he sued him.

Wang and Li are colleagues in the company. Li reported that Wang ate the steamed buns brought back from the canteen during work hours, and Wang believed that Li's report was unfounded, and Li compensated 10,000 yuan.

was reported to have eaten steamed buns at work and claimed 10,000 yuan from colleaguesIt didn't work out

Recently, the Laixi court heard a dispute over the right to reputation caused by steamed buns. After trial, the Laixi court held that the public security mediation agreement reached by the plaintiff and the defendant under the auspices of the public security organs was an expression of the true intentions of both parties, did not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations, was legal and valid, and should be performed by both parties.

Wang's request for compensation of 10,000 yuan for moral losses has no factual and legal basis and is not supported. Accordingly, Wang's litigation claim against Li was rejected.

When a colleague goes to work to eat steamed buns, he must be hungry. There is no need to report it, and even if it does, it will not be successful.

The final judgment was to dismiss the appeal and uphold the original judgment. The reason is that there is no basis for the claim of 10,000 yuan, and the whistleblower (defendant) has publicly apologized and fulfilled his legal obligations, and the plaintiff has no reason to pursue it again.

Was it reported that I went to work to eat steamed buns and claimed 10,000 yuan from my colleagues, I don't think it will be successful.

No success, no pass, no claim conditions, the above information hope to be helpful to you.

If it succeeds, the judge must be insane.

It's not right to eat at work, and it's ridiculous to have to make a claim, and you definitely won't understand.

In the workplace, between colleagues, some are united and mutually reliant, although they can't be good friends, they can also be good partners, some belong to general friends, if there is no need, they won't pay attention to it at all, and some only look down on each other, and they will always step on the opportunity when they find it, in fact, there is no need for this at all, if there is a misunderstanding or conflict, as long as one party publicly apologizes at that time,Sometimes you should choose to take a step back, otherwise it will only embarrass yourself and even affect your own future

1. The lawsuit caused by steamed bunsSecond, it will have a negative impact on yourselfIn this matter, Wang's behavior is still improper, when Li reported himself, he did have some negative impact on himself in the company, but when Li made a public apology at the company's internal meeting, these negative effects have completely disappeared, and the leader's view of himself will no longer have some bad opinions. Just the company will think that Wang is a typical nonsense, there is no tolerance for elegance, and these two points are extremely typical negative effects, these two points can easily affect their personal future, after all, if there is room for improvement, the impact of this matter is easy to be vetoed by one vote.

If you are reported to eat steamed buns at work, it should be that you have done something wrong, and the company should have a rule that you can't eat at work. Afterwards, he has to claim compensation from his colleagues, and the responsibility is put on his colleagues, and he should correct his mistakes and work hard.

We don't know whether Li wronged Wang, but after mediation by the court, Li publicly apologized to Wang and explained the situation, which can be regarded as clearing Wang's grievances. But because of this, it is not appropriate to ask for compensation of 10,000 yuan for mental damages, and the mental losses of the reported person are so expensive.

It's a bit too nonsensical and loves to make small reports, which also shows that the relationship between colleagues is not very harmonious, after all, it's understandable that sometimes I'm hungry at work and eat something.

From my personal point of view, I feel that it is not necessary, I am at fault first, and the company has stipulated that you should not eat in the manufacturing area, so don't eat, and it is even more wrong to sneak a steamed bun from the canteen.

This is a question about interpersonal communication, the whistleblower has the right to do so, but it is easy to hurt the feelings of colleagues, and the reported person claims 10,000 yuan, which is a bit unreasonable.

This kind of thing is simply nonsense, obviously I did something wrong, and my colleagues helped me correct it, and I have to claim compensation from others.

Because he ate food in the manufacturing area, he despised the violation, such management, and then reported it. But I think this phenomenon is understandable. Because we are all in a work area, then if we are in the work area, such a provocation, I think we can report this, it is very reasonable, because we go to work for the benefit of the unit, our own value creation, so I think if he affects me, then I sue him through some means, but I think that in this way, he may damage the friendship between the unit, please the friendship between colleagues, So I think it's probably not the right thing to do.

1. What is the origin of the matter because there is also one of them, who violated the law by eating food in the manufacturing area, that is, eating steamed buns, and then breaking the law, then his colleagues will do such a thing, and then there was a dispute, and then the police were called. Then it was also under the mediation of the public security organs, and the two sides also reached an agreement, that is, it was okay to apologize to each other, so when this world was about to end, however, there was one party he was unwilling in his heart, he thought that his loss had not been compensated in any way, so he sued this colleague who ate steamed buns to the court to demand, and at the same time apologize, eliminate the impact, and compensate, this loss fee of 10,000 yuan. So now the court has made a ruling, that is, it has rejected his unreasonable demand of 10,000 yuan, so I think it still meets the requirements.

Second, how to reconcile such a colleague relationship We actually, I think the most important friendship in the unit itself is, at the same time, the work friendship, so if you encounter such a thing, according to my personal point of view, I think in general, I can go to the euphemistic persuasion of him, because we all live in, this work unit, then in this environment after all, it is a public area, then, if you do something that affects me, then I will definitely be soft, I'm going to warn you, but I'm not going to be like him. It's very blunt to go to hard steel colleagues, so I think this is very unethical, and sometimes it will damage the reputation of the company, so I think that in such a situation, we should still actively and redeem the attitude of both parties.