Why do some people like to judge others on a moral level?

Some people like to be moral defenders. He thinks he knows morality very well, but he doesn't know that real morality is a kind of forgiveness for the behavior of others, not to mention that he can't talk about many things to say that others are immoral, for example, on the bus, if a young person doesn't like to give up his seat to the elderly, is that a kind of immorality? I don't think so.

The so-called morality is the code of conduct of folk self-discipline. Some people like to judge others on a moral level, and there is nothing wrong with this, just don't exaggerate the facts and deliberately hurt others. After all, morality is not law, and there is no strict judgment on judging things.

I believe that judging others on the level of virtue is first and foremost a moral person. If you are not virtuous and sick, how can you judge others, the crow does not say black when it opens its mouth, and it does not say sour when it eats scavengers. Therefore, it is better to lead by example than to speak of others' faults, and it is much better to uphold oneself and upright others than to judge others.

Of course, there are people who shovel things that are not fair, and there are people who are not fair. People are doing, the sky is looking at morality like a net, and fairness is natural to people's hearts.

As far as everyone is concerned, living in the society is like a very large family, and people must respect each other, abide by social morality, and establish moral norms, so that everyone can be safe and peaceful. But at any time, there will be some people who do not play their cards according to common sense, contrary to common sense, some people who see it stay away, some people who see it but do not see it, and some people who will stand up and say justice in order to persuade. At this moment, those who criticize others from the moral level can be said to act bravely, uphold public morality, and are just.

Fortunately, there are still many people in society who are brave enough to stand up and speak up for justice, which is called justice, justice and truth, and this is the person who makes us all worthy of respect and love. Of course, there are very few people who do not do well but stare at others every day and preach to others.

Because this can put oneself in an invincible position, appear to have a sense of justice, and there is no cost, and even the effort to know the truth does not need to be made. Standing on the moral high ground, it occupies the strategic commanding heights, in fact, many things that criticize others, if you put them on yourself, you may not be able to do it, such as righteousness and courage, so when criticizing others, think about yourself, think about the plight and choices of others in the situation at that time, more understanding, more tolerance, rather than a moral accusation.

Only by being righteous can we be righteous, how many people are sanctimonious today, full of benevolence, righteousness and morality to "teach" others, but behind the scenes, they are doing things that they think others don't know. It's just that he takes criticizing others in front of morality as his fig leaf, but in fact, the ugliness in his heart cannot be covered by fancy appearances. Who is a normal, relatively mature person who does not have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong?

This kind of person criticizes others and watches others put down dishes, which will not work for people who know their details and have righteousness. Because of his vanity, he can't stand it anymore and pays more attention to his face. Truly cultivated and moral people never criticize others casually, and even if they criticize, they are always on the facts, and they are serious and serious.

In our daily life, we should have a good heart, uphold the principles of justice, and have the power to distinguish between hypocrisy and goodness.

It is immoral to criticize others as something you like. The moral level on which it stands is a kind of pseudo-morality. This is not to oppose criticism, but to admit mistakes bravely, to accept criticism from superiors, and to bear the consequences of mistakes is the proper behavior of mature people.

And the kind of person who likes to stand in front of morality and criticize others is nothing more than self-righteousness and self-esteem, so as to show his unique existence. From ancient times to the present, convincing people with virtue is something that is done rather than spoken.

What is morality? It is a concept, a kind of constraint, it is the superego, not there is such a sentence, full of benevolence and morality, belly trouble, men and women prostitutes, often like to stand on the moral level to judge others, it has its own problems, a real moral level of people, is to know what is respect, what is understanding, the word morality itself is a big word, and what standard is used to measure morality when discussing, so you can't just use morality as a topic to judge others.

Essentially, morality is something that has binding force, and everything that has "power" can be used as a tool by those with ill intentions to force others to act for their own benefit. Now, a "I am weak, I am justified" atmosphere is spreading in society, and some people are seizing the "weak" position in order to gain more benefits for themselves. It is human nature to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, and moral blackmail will put oneself in an advantageous position and put one's opponent in a passive position.

This also led to a series of moral kidnappings.

Because only morality is the height that everyone can stand at, if he does not speak on the moral level, he may not be able to stand.

Some people's personality is like this, they can only see others forever, but they just can't see themselves, they like to criticize others, and they choose to avoid themselves.

Say that others do a good job before you do, some things may not be as simple as they seem on the surface, don't be moral. Because in terms of morality, no one can do it completely without missing out.

What is Ethics? Morality is one of the forms of social consciousness, and it is also the norm and norm for people's common life and behavior. However, there are always people who like to stand on the moral high ground to judge others.

Just like on the Internet, there are always people who act as good people, but in fact, they are the violent ones of language. Judging others without knowing all the facts can sometimes be a fatal blow.

There are always such people around me, who always use their own judgment standards to accuse others, thinking that they are moral judges, for this kind of person, I am really speechless, and I don't even bother to deal with him. Sometimes the more he deals with this kind of person, the more he will gain an inch.

Everyone is a first-time human being, and they have their own code of conduct and norms for life, and they are advised to be kind to others and to be kind to themselves. Don't stand on the moral high ground to act as a judge.

Many people lack spiritual connotation, but they want to gain a sense of superiority, and they find an outlet through accusations.

There is benefit to blaming others, first.

1. Enhance your positive image and highlight the righteousness of your words through accusations. Clause.

Second, the content of the accusation is separated from his own image, and the thief shouts to catch the thief to make people mistakenly think that he is definitely not a thief. Clause.

3. Blaming others is also conducive to avoiding others' accusations against oneself.

Clause. Fourth, it is conducive to depriving others of the benefits of other parties. Clause.

Sixth, replace one's own actions by blaming and lower the requirements of others for oneself. Seventh, by accusing others of being angry, spreading their own emotions and trying to make themselves happy. Eighth, try to show your noble sentiments.

Ninth, kill the boring time and win face at the same time. Tenth, it is a common means of competition, and the purpose of derogating others is achieved through accusations. Eleventh, I don't know how to speak and deal with things peacefully, and I can't find a better way than to accuse.

Twelfth, subjective in looking at things, self-centered, always seeing the shortcomings of others, expressing their own dissatisfaction, if you invert the role, maybe your own performance is even worse. Thirteenth, do not think about the difficulties of reality, close your eyes and talk nonsense, stand and talk without backache, fourteenth, do not want to take any responsibility, through accusations to the showdown. Fifteenth, they are unwilling to talk about fairness and justice with others, and highlight their own status and show their superiority through accusations.

Sixteenth, they are vindictive, taking torturing others as pleasure, and trying to discourage others by blaming them. Seventeenth, it is easiest to flaunt yourself and blame others, and you will gain more with less effort. Eighteenth, find psychological balance through accusations.

Nineteenth, satisfy their bureaucratic dreams and guide the feelings of the country.

Ming scholar Su Jun mentioned in the article "The Story of the Chicken Song" that there are four types of friends, fearful friends, close friends, nicknamed friends and thief friends. Fear of friends is the person who confronts and points out your problems, and is not afraid of being rejected by you; A close friend is someone who can share your weal and woe, life and death; Friends are people who eat, drink and have fun all day long; A thief is someone who sees that you need help, and instead of helping, he falls into the trap.

So Su Jun told us to make more friends and close friends, and less or no friends and thieves. So what is the connection between this and the three views? In fact, the three views can be understood as fear of friends and close friends, because when we talk to such people, we will gain a lot, their language can touch us, they will always have a positive attitude towards people and things, hoping to create an environment that is beneficial to others and themselves, so that people are satisfied.

I've heard a saying before: to all evil, keep smiling, to some good, to applaud fiercely. People who have not been in society for many years cannot understand the meaning behind this sentence.

We often reject evil, but we forget to suppress evil and promote good, and we fight against evil, but we forget to influence evil. You must know that evil is also caused by a lack of love, so it is very necessary to have the correct three views.

We often see some people who are black and white, either good or bad, their thinking is binary, lack of middle ground, then the correct concept is to see the world in diversity, tolerate differences, allow differences, there is a sentence: although I do not agree with your point of view, I defend your right to speak, this is the correct concept, because everyone will have the freedom to speak freely, but it is good to be responsible for their own words.

Therefore, when we get along with the three views, we will feel very comfortable, warm, harmonious and relaxed. The theory of the butterfly effect is that your change will drive the people around you to change, and often a small act you make at the beginning will contribute to the process of a big event later.

Then by doing things that benefit others and ourselves, we are changing ourselves, and others will slowly join in by being influenced and inspired by our actions.

What are the criteria for judging whether a person is moral? In life, we often hear such words; Be a moral person; This man is not moral at all; You have to behave ethically, and so on. Sometimes when you think about it, what is moral?

What is the standard of morality?