What should I do if my boss is always pointing at my work and denying my efforts?

What should I do if my boss is always pointing at my work and denying my efforts?

1.It is necessary to determine whether it is the problem of the leadership or the problem of oneself. When the leader scolds you, we should think about whether the matter is caused by the leader's own mistake or because you are not careful and careless.

If it is caused by the leader himself, then if the leader scolds you, you should not go to your heart, and give the leader a step down first. Later, find time to explain to the leader in private, so that the leader will not hate you for not giving face. But if it is because of your own reasons, let the leader scold you, then what you should do at this time is to admit your mistakes first, and then find an opportunity to make up for them.

Then avoid the possibility of making another mistake next time so that the leader doesn't have a reason to criticize you again.

2.Find out if your boss doesn't approve of your work goals or your usual way of working. If you are not satisfied with the work goal, you should establish the work goal as early as possible before the work starts, and let the leader confirm it.

You should also make periodic reports in the subsequent promotion process to avoid the result that the work goals cannot be agreed upon during the work performance appraisal. If you're not happy with the way you work, there must be a specific reason. Learn to figure out the boss's intentions:

When we talk to the leader, we are always worried about the leader's attitude and what we should say, but we don't really understand the overtone and true intention contained in the leader's words.

3.I think that the leader is satisfied with his work but denies his own ability, which may be a spur to you. Your leader may think that there is a lot of room for improvement in your abilities.

I think you should be working on improving your abilities at the moment. Then, continue to help the leader do things well and continue to work hard. If you are satisfied with your work but deny your abilities, then you may have a certain view of yourself, that is, if you can do a good job and don't do some behaviors, you will definitely be able to settle down, and you should also believe in your own abilities, rather than blindly doing something and denying yourself.

I think that the leader is satisfied with his work but denies his own ability, which may be a spur to you.

At this time, you should vent your negative emotions, and then have a more positive working state, to think hard about whether your ability is really insufficient, whether there are several shortcomings put forward by the leader, to continuously improve personal ability, to have your own work attitude, take the initiative to bring more economic benefits to the company, in this case will make the leader re-evaluate you.

While doing their own work with their hearts, try to manage upwards. Report more work with the leader, communicate more with the leader, understand the leader's intentions, and if you really can't solve it, then leave your job.

When I met such a boss, I was very speechless, if I felt that I was really not very happy, I just chose to resign, we came out to work, not to suffer.

First of all, you have to know what you are looking for a job for, if you want to make money to support your family, the money is the first place, as the old saying goes, the official is crushed to death, he is your boss has the right to fire you, if the job is very important to you, the whole family is counting on it to eat, then you have to know that forbearance in society is a compulsory course, if you hold the mentality that you are not short of money just to have fun, it doesn't matter if you have a job or not, then you can debate with him. If you turn your face in a hurry, you have nothing to lose.

I think that many times this kind of boss must have something to do with it, so don't think of offending him somewhere. Then do your own thing.

A boss who doesn't understand anything is still pointing fingers, which means that the boss is very "conceited", and the direct performance is that he doesn't know how to pretend to understand. In fact, what this kind of boss needs is the blind obedience of his subordinates to satisfy his inner vanity.

For this kind of boss, if you dare to speak your mind and opinion, then I tell you, you will definitely not end well. Maybe once or twice, he will also pose and appear to be very democratic, but there are too many times, you just wait for him to give you a ** behind his back! If you think about it carefully, if he is really a humble person and a democratic person, how can he not know how to pretend to understand?

So, for this kind of boss, you have to do three things:

First, keep your distance, and don't group it. Keep your distance, which means not getting too close, and not going too far. To be out of group is to keep in touch with this kind of boss, but don't follow too closely and don't trust too much.

Second, don't object too much to this kind of boss. Once or twice is fine, but never too often, especially if you openly object or raise opinions. This kind of boss is absolutely very vain and very hypocritical.

Third, leave evidence for yourself in everything. This kind of boss dares not to pretend to understand, and there must be a set of "crisis handling" methods behind him, most of which are dumped on his subordinates. Therefore, when encountering such a boss, if you feel that his opinion or instructions are problematic and it is inconvenient to oppose them, it is best to find a way to leave written evidence.

Here's how I did it myself: when my boss gave me verbal instructions, I felt that there was a problem, but it was inconvenient to mention it in person, so I agreed first. Then, take the opportunity to write an email and deliberately ask your boss if you did this what you told you about last time.

It's best to look for opportunities where your boss has to reply to you with an email, such as if you and your boss don't meet in person. In this way, you leave yourself with documentary evidence that your boss instructed you.

Why? Because I've met such a boss. A colleague of mine, who is still his confidant, was questioned by his boss because he had been handling things according to his boss, and finally his boss put all the responsibility on him and picked himself clean.

Because there was no documentary evidence, the colleague had to carry the black pot in the end. So later, we all tried our best to shirk the work presided over by our boss, and it was really inconvenient to shirk, which was also the meaning. Another colleague who was not treated well by his boss felt that this was an opportunity, so he took the initiative to curry favor with his boss, and soon became the new favorite of his boss.

In the end, the boss was fired for poor performance, and he became the first subordinate to be laid off after the new boss took office.

At work, he is the boss, and I respect him, but I will also express my thoughts and opinions when it comes to vexatious finger-pointing.

What should you do if a boss at work who doesn't know anything always dictates your work? First of all, work is to support the family, and in today's society, it is not easy to find a job, so if you can endure it, you can endure it. If you really can't stand it, you can change jobs, as long as your work is practical and serious, you can do it if you continue to **?

It's gold that always shines, and it's not necessarily bad to give up and work, so you can change jobs, thank you!!

There are a variety of reasons why leaders assign troublesome work to employees, such as weight, no one to do, more suitable to do, and deliberately difficult, etc., and employees can choose whether to refuse according to the specific content of the work and the impact on the individual.

For example, the reason why leaders sometimes assign troublesome work to employees is because of the importance and focus on training, so there is nothing wrong with the troublesome work, after all, these tasks may be the daily content after promotion, so it is not good to refuse.

There are many people in the company, and leaders will make decisions based on the personal ability and performance of employees when arranging work. And there are some employees who are more down-to-earth and have strong execution, and they will be valued by the leader, so in this case, these people are very likely to be promoted.

Leaders who want to promote an employee can't just make a casual decision. There are bound to be differences when it comes to arranging work. At this time, the content of the employee's work will change, and the difficulty will increase. If an employee refuses to be offered by a leader for fear of trouble, he or she will lose the opportunity for promotion.

No matter what kind of company you are in, there are tasks that are more troublesome and cannot be assigned to individuals. Old employees contribute to the company, so naturally these jobs will not be assigned to them. The salary of new employees is shallow and relatively easy to handle, so most of these jobs will fall on these people.

Some people choose to say no, some people choose to accept it, but the experience is different.

If these jobs do not involve personal self-esteem or threaten the interests of others, the new employees will accept these jobs, they will be experienced and promoted, and it will be easier for them to integrate into the new group.

The company has a lot of work and needs to be assigned. Leaders will most likely make arrangements based on the personal abilities and characteristics of employees. For example, an employee has a cheerful personality and is good at dealing with people, and when the company has a foreign visitor, he will be arranged to receive him.

In addition, there are some jobs that are more cumbersome and suitable for being sent to people who are patient. If you happen to be this kind of person, the leader will naturally assign this kind of work to you. If the job is partial, there is no reason to say no. If it is a non-part-time job, you can decide whether to refuse it by analyzing the pros and cons.

Generally speaking, leaders do not make things difficult for employees, unless there are special circumstances. If this is the case, the employee may decide whether to refuse or not.

First of all, if the work is within the scope of the job and others are better at doing this kind of work, you can give advice to the leader and assign the work to a more suitable person. It can also be prevaricated on the grounds that there is a lot of work at hand, there is no time, or the superior leader has special arrangements. If the leader assigns work that is outside of his or her responsibilities and deliberately makes it difficult, the employee may decline on the grounds that it is not his or her area of responsibility.

Working at a company is not a vacation, and employees need to work hard to get paid. In general, leaders rarely deliberately make things difficult for employees, unless they have a special purpose, background, or experience. As an employee, you can choose whether to refuse or not according to the scope of responsibilities, leadership personality and work arrangement, etc., so as to adapt to the complex environment and work needs of the workplace.

I am within my own tolerance, I can do it if I want to, if my work pressure is particularly high, I don't have time to do it, I have to refuse in time, don't blindly pay.

It's okay to say no, because these troublesome tasks will distract you and give you less time to do your job, and the quality will be difficult to guarantee, and you have every reason to say no, because it's not your job.

Can be refused. Work is when we do our job. Instead of helping the leader solve some troublesome things all the time, you can put forward your own demands with the leader when necessary.

It is inevitable that we will be scolded by our superiors in the workplace. We have self-esteem and consciously and constantly affirm our worth. Being criticized is the moment when our own self-worth is denied, and it is also the moment when we are most prone to emotional problems.

The boss's criticism was right, and we knew rationally that he was for us or for the company, and although there was dissatisfaction, there was no special emotional reaction. However, if you criticize the mistakes, you will not be able to accept them, and now you will not only be dissatisfied, but you will also be even more angry. Some people can talk, some people can give feedback to the leader, so they are not very good at talking, and the timid ones just nod their heads non-stop and then take pride in their gray selves, while those who can't ask their superiors will not only scold behind their backs, but also care.

So, how do we respond to leadership criticism in general?

The first thing is to control your feelings

First of all, it is necessary to suppress feelings. It's okay to have feelings, but don't look at it with feelings. Looking back on the whole process of things, at what stage did you not reach your status, at which stage will problems occur, and your boss will criticize you?

Take the initiative to admit your mistakes

First of all, admit your mistakes, pay attention, only admit part of your mistakes, and objectively explain your mistakes in **. It is not necessary to take the faults of others as a blanket, nor can you blame others for their mistakes. Even if your work is not wrong, even if your boss makes a mistake and scolds someone, you should reflect on why this is the case.

Won't our work report cause misunderstanding among leaders? Or is there no minimum foundation of trust with leaders?

After reflecting on oneself, if you are able to justify and clarify the misunderstanding, you should first reflect and speak for yourself, and the leader will be easy to understand.

Communicate with your supervisor

We are often not good at communicating with our bosses, understanding their expectations, and needing to know what he expects from us, so I can do my job successfully. Whether the goal decided by the boss is in line with your current ability and actual situation, implement it first and then give feedback, or exchange your own ideas and suggestions with your boss to give your boss suggestions and feedback.

If the leaders are not satisfied with your work, then you should first have a good talk with these leaders, and communicate with them, only good communication can you understand each other more.

If the boss criticizes his work, it means that he is still inadequate, so he should use some heart to do his job better, which is also beneficial to his own growth.