Do Xiao Yueyue s parents need to be responsible?

The main responsibility should be borne by the main one.

Usually, in this kind of lawsuit, parents have to pay more than 50% of the responsibility.

Now ** is deliberately sparing the parents of their children in order to concentrate their firepower on passers-by and better expose the so-called social darkness. In fact, the parents of the child are also part of the darkness, but they selectively let go, and its purpose is self-evident.

Everyone remembers the Wenzhou EMU accident, but at the same time they forget the Henan Expressway passenger car ** case, in that case, there were more dead passengers than the EMU, but it was deliberately forgotten. The same human life, the same equal human life in the mouth, but it disappeared from newspapers, television, and the Internet. Because it's very simple, the bus that had the accident was an ordinary person with no background.

And the EMU accident is backed by the Ministry of Railways. Therefore, it is believed that the passenger car case is not newsworthy, and the EMU is valuable. Human life, the human life in the mouth, disappears behind the words newsworthiness.

The hypocrisy makes me angry, but the selective reporting makes me feel terrible. Why are they like this? To what end? All wise people think about it.

Yes, as the guardian of the child, he has the right to protect their personal safety.

This responsibility must be had, and since it is necessary to bring children into this world, it should be responsible!!

I think they must have seriously understood what responsibility was to be held accountable.

And you, me, and the rest of the public don't have to criticize and punish those who are more wrong.

If you are a parent, now that you have heard about this and have thought about it, you don't need others to tell you what your responsibilities are as parents.

Personally, I think there is a certain amount of responsibility.

It really can't be absolute, it depends. But in fact, Chinese generally can think that like our side (Guangdong), I often see the situation that parents take their children out of the countryside, but they only care about making money all day long, and children often have accidents, after all, there are many cars in the city, and the machinery is complicated, if you don't take care of it, the child will not have the treatment in the countryside. Just half a month ago, a boy a few years old was crushed to death by a stone bench in Shunde, and some time ago, a boy was swept to death by that kind of floodgate.

There are countless cases of his children hurting other people's children if they don't take good care of their children. Children are inherently active and difficult to manage, and they are still in the city, and parents have to helplessly put a lot of effort into making a living, which is also a bit helpless. Xiao Yueyue was in the wholesale market when this happened, and many people said that they were typing on the calculator and counting the money, but they didn't see it.

Parents probably do the same. This is true even for city children, unless they can afford a babysitter or have an older generation to take with them.

No time, busy work can not be an excuse to raise children in the car in the car, their parents should be second**. If you don't have the conditions and energy, you don't deserve to have children, and if you give birth, you have to take care of them.

I can't imagine how such a small child can go out alone, and still be in the city.

There are many people in the car.

Nowadays, children in rural families follow wherever they go, for fear of falling and bumping into them.

Yes, such a small child must be taken by a parent to go out, and there are too many cars on the road now.

Why do things like this always happen?

This time, it was first reported by the Persian Cat Forum.

It seems that the power of netizens is too strong.

I was surprised when I first watched it, how could no one save her, even if it was a **, seeing that this heart was all colic, I didn't expect that there would be so many ruthless people, but looking back, can I only say that they are timid and afraid? Isn't morality far from it? Do they want more than less?

I don't think exactly, what is the current social atmosphere, I think everyone knows, there are ruthless passers-by, there are ruthless victims, ruthless masses, and ruthless sanctioners, who can say what those higher-level characters will be like callers? Sometimes a person saves people, **, the society, they still scold you, and the court will punish you, resulting in a social atmosphere, even if it is the fault of the perpetrator, as long as he saves it, he is considered to be moral, since the perpetrators are not saved, why should those people be saved? Do they want to be the perpetrators?

Don't they know that it costs money to save people? Take a little girl crying on the road, maybe someone will ask her what's wrong, but most people will still look at people, her clothes, her appearance, not to mention a child covered in blood, we often only have a sense of justice when we see the moment of moving, and when this thing passes, will everyone still have this sense of justice, why do we have national borders, because people from all countries have the behavior and character of people from all countries, because there are too many such people in our country, because there are too many such atmospheres, So many people define saving people as a crime, such cases are not nothing, there are many, here will not be one by one, saving people is also criticized a lot of things, more things are better than less in the hearts of the Chinese, the impression is very good, so if you don't save at most, you will be scolded, and if you save it, you will be scolded and then suffered, because there are many people who think like this, those 18 people may think like this, we can't say how high we are, when encountering this kind of thing, you can do it with a clear conscience! It doesn't matter if you are missing the chain, pure salvation or not!

From the driver: "It's a big deal to pay tens of thousands of dollars if you hit and die, but you don't die for a lifetime." It can be seen that he already knows that he is pressing a person. And with a subjective motive for homicide, it should be regarded as intentional homicide. Sentenced to death or life imprisonment.

Now the prosecution intends to sue for negligence causing death. There is no death penalty for this crime.

Someone like this is just going to get a big sniper and get a headshot, it's so inhuman. He's not human, and his family isn't human, otherwise how would he have raised such a brute! Xiao Yueyue goes all the way.

As guardians, Xiao Yueyue's parents did not fulfill their responsibilities to take care of Xiao Yueyue and should have borne some responsibility, but because the drivers of the two cars escaped after the traffic accident, the drivers of the two cars were fully responsible, and the driver of the first traffic accident caused the car was mainly responsible. "The first car that caused a traffic accident has been suspected of the crime of causing a traffic accident and may face a maximum sentence of more than 7 years in prison. "The second vehicle did not stop or slow down when the girl could be seen, so it was also held responsible.

The lawyer analyzed that it can be seen from the surveillance video that the driver of the first traffic accident obviously stopped the car after the front wheel of the car ran over the child, indicating that he had felt something rolled over by the wheel, and the driver was driving on the street, and it was obliged to get out of the car to check when this happened. In particular, it should be emphasized that the first run may be that the driver did not notice the child, which is a traffic accident, and the child may be slightly injured at this time. However, the driver hesitated to start the vehicle again, and the rear wheels ruthlessly ran over the child, judging from the driver's sense of running over the child, continuing to drive in order to escape, and allowing the injury to the child to occur, which is suspected of indirect intentional injury, and is an inexcusable cruel act.

Therefore, the relevant departments should investigate and punish as soon as possible.

If he doesn't shoot. It's hard to solve the people's anger! The law is unjust. Don't try to excuse yourself with any excuses. The front wheels are car accidents. The rear wheel is **!

Little Yueyue Paradise goes all the way!

The Criminal Law stipulates the crime of causing death by negligence, and if no one reports the case, the public security organs generally do not take the initiative to file a case for investigation.

The responsibility in the narrow sense lies on Xiao Yueyue's parents, and as the guardian of the child, it is a gross negligence to let the child walk on the road.

Responsibility in a broad sense should be the responsibility of the people, and it is precisely because the company does not pay attention to the protection of minors and the construction of the people's spiritual civilization that it leads to the decline of social morality and the ineffectiveness of social assistance.

The loss of conscience and morality, the failure of Chinese education.

Of course, her parents have an unshirkable responsibility, but the focus of the discussion in the Xiao Yueyue incident is not to hold anyone responsible, but to ignore such a seriously injured child, more than a dozen passers-by passed by and no one paid attention, which is a degradation of social morality.