Can a salesperson still report a crime if he steals money in the past nine years?

If he steals money, you can report it as long as you have evidence. But if there is no evidence, that's best. Don't report it, because after all, after so many years, if there is not enough evidence.

In the end, it may not be good for both parties. If there is evidence, before the law he is. Can't run away.

If the salesperson steals too much money. You have solid evidence. You can report the crime.

If only the money stolen wasn't much. You don't have hard evidence either. It's best not to report the crime.

And help him. Let him correct his mistakes. Don't throw money in the future.

Be a good person.

Everything has to have evidence, the salesman stole money, if it can be proved that this is true, of course, you can go to the police, although nine years have passed, whether the case can be filed and dealt with depends on the public security bureau to say.

It's okay for the salesman to steal money for nine years, and you can report the case by appearing, but after nine years, you may be unfair in sharing the spoils, so if you want to report the case now, the public security police will definitely stay at the police station for the two of you and ask you to make a record yourself.

Yes, but you don't have documents and it's been so long, it's useless to report the crime.

Then you are suspicious. There is no monitoring, there is monitoring. You can call it up and take a look.

It's for the best. If there is no evidence to prove that she took it, then it is estimated that she cannot report the crime. And.

You should also report the crime when you know about it. And not wait until now. It is estimated that the search for evidence is unlikely at this time.

Yes, the parties can ask the suspect for compensation when they provide favorable evidence.

If there is evidence and the amount stolen is relatively large, you can still report the crime.

Cashiers stealing money are suspected of committing a criminal offense of embezzlement. It depends on the specific circumstances, and if it is not serious, the statute of limitations may have expired for criminal liability. The statute of limitations for civil liability has long since passed.

Because nine years have passed, the period for prosecution of the incident has passed, and there is no evidence, the court will not accept it.

I think as long as there is evidence and the amount is large, it should be fine, but there is no evidence to see the description, so it should be useless to report.

If you don't have evidence, what do you report to the crime, and you can't convict others if you guess closely, or so long has passed, and it's not as easy to check as it was at the beginning, so let's talk about it if there is evidence.

If there is evidence, it can be reported to the police.

You can get him to pay the money back. If nine years have passed, the litigation period should have passed.

How much I stole from you, forget about a few thousand yuan, besides, you didn't report it at the beginning, what evidence do you have after so long, if it was a large amount, you wouldn't have reported it for so long.

Unless there is evidence of the exact fact that the salesperson stole money nine years ago.

It's really too hard and too long without enough evidence.

Do you have real evidence? If you have one, you can report it, no matter how many years the numbers will speak.

Stealing money from a salesperson is an act of theft, and a case will be filed as long as it is committed.

It's just that if the amount does not reach a large amount, it is a public security case; Reaching the standard of a relatively large amount constitutes a crime and is a criminal case. The standard for the amount of criminal cases to be filed varies from place to place.

Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Handling of Criminal Cases of Theft

Article 1: Where the value of public or private property is between 1,000 and 3,000 RMB, 30,000 to 100,000 RMB, or 300,000 to 500,000 RMB, it shall be respectively found to be a "relatively large amount", "huge amount", or "especially huge amount" as provided for in Criminal Law article 264.

The high people's courts and people's procuratorates of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government may, on the basis of the economic development situation of their respective regions and consider the state of public security, determine the specific monetary standards for enforcement in their respective regions within the range of amounts provided for in the preceding paragraph, and report to the Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate for approval.

It should be combined with the scope of responsibility of the salesperson. If it is an ordinary sales clerk, the amount of money stolen (secretly opening the cash drawer with a key and obtaining the cash register password without authorization) reaches a relatively large amount, which constitutes the crime of theft.

If the salesperson is responsible for keeping the cash drawer in the company or enterprise at the same time, or has the duty to keep the cash (in charge of keeping the key to the cash drawer, or being responsible for the inventory and handover of the cash register, etc.), the amount of money stolen reaches a relatively large amount, which constitutes the crime of embezzlement.

The crime of embezzlement in public office refers to the conduct of personnel of a company, enterprise, or other unit who take advantage of their position to illegally take possession of the unit's property for themselves, and the amount is relatively large.