Didn t it be said in ancient times that the whole world was loess? Why did foreign countries be reco

In order to prevent the strength from falling behind.

If you fight, your strength will decrease.

In order to consolidate the rule ...

Because the ancient West was described by the ancient Chinese as "drinking blood" as a wild animal that did not evolve into a human language.

In such a state of humanity, how can the people of the Chinese Loess Plateau, who have been humanized for hundreds of thousands of years, be willing to admit that "the ancient West was more advanced than China"?

The evolution of human beings is largely reflected in the language of world perception, and how can a humanoid creature that still does not have the ability to describe things in the original language be said to be "advanced antiquity" as the history of human culture?

The extant historical materials of China 2,000 years ago are far more than the sum of ancient classics in the West and even the world, and their language forms are clearly different from modern languages, and even the content and meaning are even more profound and far-reaching.

In Western languages, all the languages used to describe things except names are in the Chinese format, even the poems and songs of the so-called "Renaissance" period, which are also expressed in the Chinese format of the Western language form, and even the foreign language versions of the poems of the Tang and Song dynasties.

Obviously, the evolution of the original language of the West in the Chinese format was interrupted from the beginning, and even the most advanced technical language in the West today did not reflect its native language format, and Obama's commendation of the Chinese people in his Spring Festival speech in 16 years for contributing more than a dozen English words every year further confirmed the ability of this language to express itself.

Therefore, "many netizens do not admit that the ancient West is more advanced than China", and there is no need for any cultural relics evidence, the language format says everything, including the so-called Western Industrial Revolution, which is just "Made in China" with a foreign name, and the Chinese's language ability is not something that anyone who is "advanced" can cover up, but more reflects China's incompetence and degradation today.

It is this kind of thinking that makes the former Chinese arrogant, arrogant and stupid, and makes the thinking of the former Chinese stagnate, believing that they are the center of the universe, the world revolves around them, they are the model of civilization, and everything else is barbarian. In fact, it is not by chance that China was completely destroyed by the West, but that the entire human morality, ideology, combat concept, science, and legal system were comprehensively crushed by others.

If you don't conform to the people's feelings, it is not in line with the will of heaven, so you will be destroyed, the kings of the ancient empires are always more capable and more clear and diligent at the beginning, and then they are always not as good as the next generation.

Those who have a clear heart will win the world, and those who lose the hearts of the people will lose the world.

The rulers of the early dynasties attached great importance to the aspirations of the people, but the emperors of later generations, due to their birth in the court and their consistent pampering, have long forgotten what the people's hearts are, and it is no wonder that they do not perish.

There is no eternal and unchanging regime according to the objective law of historical development.

If it is not conducive to the development of history, it will be eliminated.

Saying that the general trend of the world is that it will be divided for a long time, and it will be divided for a long time.

Imperial power represents the interests of only a very small number of people, and unless it is symbolic (as in England), it must be overthrown by the masses.

When the ancestors were making buildings, they used wood from local materials, and stone buildings were more conducive to defense.

The ancestors used wood when making buildings.

Because from ancient times to the present, the architecture of ancient China was made of wood.

Ancient people's ability to resist floods was low, and people preferred to live in places where the climate was relatively arid and rivers flowed. For example, the lower reaches of the Nile, the two river basins, and the Indus River basin, the birthplace of ancient civilizations in the world, all have a desert climate, while the lower reaches of the Yellow River in China have a desert climate and relatively little precipitation. In these arid climates, forests are scarce, and people do not have enough wood, so they use local materials and use stones and earth as building materials.

Because of the convenience of the material.

In the beginning, there was no technology to develop building materials manually.

This is a key issue that has been seriously ignored by modern archaeology and historiography.

There is also the concept of "ancient civilization" that is quite questionable

1. Stones and bricks.

1. They focused on the age of these buildings, and did not pay attention to the cultural connotation gap between natural building materials and bricks.

Natural building materials stone, passedExcavationTake it and use it.

Artificially fired bricks, human understanding and use of fire, and special understanding of soil, need to have considerable cultural connotations to be achieved.

2. The gap between the soil is not small, and the gap between the cultural connotation of glutinous rice lime mixture and clay is even greater.

The clay in the soil is a natural product that can be used directly without the need for chemical reactions.

Glutinous rice lime, glutinous rice is the food biological clay rice developed by the people of the Loess Plateau science and technology, and lime is the building material produced by the people of the Loess Plateau through the use of flame calcination chemical reaction.

3. There is a huge gap between culture and civilization in building materials.

Reasons for ignoring these issues:

First, the experts are only specialized in the archaeological year, and the building materials need to hire another expert, and the archaeological content is hastily defined.

Second, the Chinese imperial court deliberately hid the content and released false information.

The third is that they simply lack knowledge.

2. The concept of ancient civilization.

The gap between the state polity and religious gangs or primitive tribes.

1. The form of government of the state.

The state is the product of mankind's entry into class society.

The state government system is the administrative system of the upper class to manage the country, and it is a national civilization system supported by profound cultural connotations.

2. Religious gangs of primitive tribes.

With the exception of ancient China, the so-called ancient civilizations of the ancient kingdoms appeared in the form of religious gangs, primitive tribes and small territorial kingdoms, which had not yet evolved into the civilizational height of the national polity.

Even the slightly civilized "ancient Indian country" is limited to the category of primitive tribes, not the concept of "Indian state", but the primitive tribes established under the concept of "Indian subcontinent".

3. China established the world's earliest state and national polity.

It was not until the Tang Dynasty that many kingdoms on the Indian subcontinent gradually formed.

The second is the formation of the Western nations.

Therefore, artificial building materials reflect the progress of human culture, the use of stone and mud to build, but also primitive people out of the cave-hole. cultural progress.

The customs and habits of each country are different, some people like to use stones, some people use sand, it's normal, there is no need to be so entangled to wish you happiness.

Because these materials are relatively easy to obtain, in large quantities, durable, moldable, and have a good effect of sheltering from wind and rain.

Ideological control, this will save a lot of unnecessary trouble, if you choose the policy of peace of the people, it will cost a lot of manpower, material and financial resources, the feudal rulers at that time, naturally unwilling.

.This issue is a bit big

1. The history of ancient wooden buildings of the Chinese is much longer than the history of stone houses in Europe.

2. The most important thing is that China's primitive mainland inhabited places are all loess, there are almost no stones, but there is no shortage of trees, local materials, convenient and fast, light weight, good earthquake resistance function, and the technical content far exceeds the stone structure of the house.

In fact, most of the houses in ancient China, including modern people's houses living in mountainous areas, are also simple structures made of stone, but you don't know about it.

3. On the European land, although there is no shortage of trees, there is no carpentry technology, so it has to use stone drying.

4. You can't compare European temple architecture with Chinese private houses, and it is unfair to compare the concept of not the same class.

The buildings of ancient Chinese palaces are basically made of bricks and wood, and the technical content and aesthetics are far from being comparable to stone buildings.

What's more, the stone in Europe was obtained by applying the gunpowder technology introduced from China and the tools used to smelt metal.

That is to say, before the introduction of Chinese technology to Europe, they were also simple stone houses.

5. For these contents, you also need to compare them with a lot of knowledge that is difficult to obtain, in order to get a clearer impression.

In fact, I had similar doubts when I was a child, but I never consulted anyone, and I gained knowledge through books, **, film and television

In addition to the difficulty of taking materials, it is related to architectural ideas, Chinese pay attention to local materials, because most of our cities are built by water, vegetation and trees are relatively lush, so wood is used to build walls. Westerners prefer to build cities on the mountain, so it is easier to take stones.

Why ancient Chinese buildings are all wooden structures, while Europeans use stone to build houses, in the primary school curriculum, the author gives many possible reasons, including that the European architectural civilization should be later than China, subject to technical conditions; different habitat concepts; cultural differences, etc., but none of them are very certain.

In fact, China has a lot of land, and the ancient people are mostly gathered in the plains with better agricultural conditions, and the lack of stone, lack of transportation conditions, transportation difficulty, and high cost should be the main reason.

And some European countries, especially France, have boulder stones, which have originated in France, and spread rapidly throughout Europe, and its advanced navigation technology provides conditions for the spread.

The root cause is the difference in natural conditions.

The Yellow River Basin, where the ancient Chinese lived, and the Yangtze River Basin lack stones. China is an agrarian society, and people like to live in plains and places where the land is fertile, which naturally lacks stones.

Although there is no shortage of stone-producing mountainous areas in China, the human and financial resources required to transport the stones to the ruling center are too great.

The Northern Song Dynasty simply transported the ornamental Taihu stone from Jiangnan to Kaifeng, which almost emptied the treasury.

Europe is mountainous, needless to say.

This is intrinsically related to the farming nation

Wood is much better to work with and flexible than stone, and the ancient Chinese also had a lot of stone construction, such as the Zhaozhou Bridge, and the Europeans also used a lot of wood in their construction, such as roofs and minarets.

It should be more difficult to take stones, time is used to produce food, many people are poorer, there is not enough to eat, Europe is easy to take stones, there is food, there is time.

Not necessarily. There are also stones, such as Zhaozhou Bridge is stone, arch bridges, stone chambers, such as the Great Wall....These are of stone, too!

Just go and live in a stone house.

It looks good, and it is cold in winter and hot in summer.

There are a lot of stone castles in Europe, and no one lives in them in modern times, because they are uncomfortable.

The reason why they live in stone buildings is mainly to prevent theft, and their ancestors are either bandits or pirates, or they are both bandits and pirates......In the robbers' den, it is natural to strengthen the ...... of anti-theft facilities

Why are all the stone churches left? Because the wood burned out in the early years, it was not uncommon for various knights to loot churches.

I don't think I can generalize about this, or because there is more wood near our country, and the nearest material is taken, while Europe may have less wood, so stone is used.

Environmental awareness and construction difficulty.

The difficulty of the wooden structure is greater, and the living is more magnificent!

China's ancient timber resources are relatively abundant, easy to take materials, relative to stone, transportation is also more convenient, stone mining is difficult, not convenient to transport, the corresponding cost will increase a lot. The construction of Genyue in the Song Dynasty was because of the loss of money and money because of the search for strange stones from all over the world, and its demise was somewhat due to this factor. In ancient Europe, stone resources were abundant, and the environment was harsh and there were few wood resources.