The money from the sale of the ancestral house is used by his daughter to buy a new house, how can t

Hello, according to your description. This question needs to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

The old man sold his house. The purpose is to buy a new house for my daughter. There is no other housing for the elderly.

The new house that my daughter bought, all the money was paid by the old man. And the daughter did not write an IOU. The old man lived in this house.

It is not a matter of writing documents, the name of the old man should be written on the title deed.

As a parent, you have the obligation to raise your child. But there is no obligation to buy a house for a child after adulthood. It is the elderly parents who are willing to help their children.

It is also the moral consideration of the parents. When people are old, they are most afraid of not having a place to live, and if they meet unfilial children. That old man may face in the future.

There is no house to live in.

In order to provide a guarantee for the future life of the elderly. It is also in order to do a good job of the responsibilities that children should do. It is also a standard for life.

As long as the old man has no other place to live, the money for the house is paid by the old man. Then be sure to write the name of the old man on the title deed. It is also possible to set up a separate note.

Go to the notary office to notarize it and prove that the old man has the right to live in the house forever.

If the old man has other houses, only part of the money for this house is paid by the old man. And this money daughter is. If you borrow it, then you have to write an IOU.

The IOU is written clearly when it will be returned. Timing of borrowing and borrower. In this way, as long as the time comes, the daughter can return the money to the father.

After all, it is the pension money of the elderly.

If the old man volunteered to give the money to his daughter. The elderly have a retirement salary and other housing. Then write that the old man gave it to his daughter voluntarily.

The old man has the right to permanent residence in the daughter's house. This matter depends on the actual situation. Think also from the perspective of being a human being.

The elderly solve the problem of their daughter's housing, and the daughter should be grateful for her father's dedication.

When people are doing things, they must do things well, and they must also do people well. In this way, you can convince others that you can't just take care of yourself and not be a good person in order to do things, which will be condemned by your conscience and the world. Personal opinion, thank you!

When buying a house, there should be a payment voucher, showing that it was paid by the elderly, and the house is for children, which can mean that the house was bought with the money of the elderly and has the right to live.

A housing agreement between a parent and a child can state that the parents have permanent residency in the house, and that's it.

The housing agreement between the parents and the children can state that the parents have permanent residency in the house, and the housing agreement between the parents and the children can state that the parents have permanent residence in the house, and that is fine. That's it.

Just let the procedures of the daughter's house be all over the old man's name and the old man's name), so the old man's daughter is down-to-earth!

The old man still writes in the children's house, according to the money, all the money has bought you a new house, and this house was bought by the old man. Do you still use written notes? You are also too interesting, if you write a note, you will give this house to you, but you must have the right to live in the elderly.

Can't you also old man go. If there is one side to go, it is that the children do not need it. Write something else.

If the children want to drive the old man away, or force him to write evidence, then the house cannot be bought for him.

The first housing agreement must clearly state that the parents voluntarily used the money from the sale of the ancestral house to buy a new house for their daughter in order to relieve the pressure of their daughter's life. The second is to write that when the old man is alive, the daughter is not allowed to **** the house without authorization, and the parents have the permanent right of residence. The third is to make it clear that if a daughter violates this agreement, the daughter must repay the 10,000 yuan paid by her parents for buying a house and the corresponding interest to protect the life of the elderly.

Today, Party A** (that is, you) contributes 100,000 yuan to Party B** (in order to avoid trouble in the future, it is best to be the real estate certificate registrant, that is, the one registered by your father or your mother, or both of them can be written) to buy a house (indicate the location, real estate certificate number, you can also write a note at the back and add it, but you have to sign again), Party A** (you) enjoy the ownership of the property of 100,000 yuan in the initial transaction of the house.

Signature of Party A. Signature of Party B.

Note: The house is located in *** real estate certificate number *** house transaction ***** signature of Party A. Signature of Party B.

I think it's better to do things the other way around: let your parents pay you to buy a house, the property right of the house belongs to you, you can let your parents live in it, and when your parents give you money, you have to let other siblings testify, you write a note to your parents, and say how much money you borrowed from your parents, and set up a letter as proof. This way you don't have to worry about your property being divided among other children.

In your case, the full collection of the house belongs to the daughter, not to you, but the house payment is paid by you, in order to prove that you paid it, you and the daughter can only make a note to prevent future troubles.

As a modern old man, don't think about things too old. In your lifetime, no matter how old you are, if you can afford to buy a house, write your own name. Don't think too much about it.

Wait until you die in a hundred years. The house can serve as a legacy. Bequeathed to children.

It doesn't cost much to get a fee. Only in this way, no matter what, I have a sense of accomplishment. In fact, he will leave a little inheritance to his children in the future.

In your case, although you pay the bank loan, the ownership and property rights of the house belong to your daughter, and there is no way to prove that the production area of the house belongs to you. The bank's loan records can only prove that you paid for it.

Is this loan also in your name? If not, you don't have to pay it

The invoice you paid is your proof.

Keep the bank loan certificate, if you are unfortunate enough to have a lawsuit in the future, the code can be used as evidence, otherwise you will pay the house is not yours.

The owner is in the mother-in-law's name, so you can't buy or sell in the first place.

The daughter-in-law is not the owner of the house, and only has the right to use the residence, not the right to dispose of it.

It's best to go to a law firm and let someone write a copy of it, which is also a legal benefit!

Whether the father is still alive or not, if so, is assigned by the old man. If not, there is no relevant document to prove that it is a son, and the court will decide.

Looking for evidence of my daughter's house purchase and going to the court for a verdict.

Present the receipt of payment for the purchase of the house at that time.

He's only living temporarily, don't worry, or you'll transfer the house to your daughter's name.

In the ancestral house, the son is the head of the household, and the daughter is married and moves out.

Because, under normal circumstances, the head of the house is determined according to the household register. And the owner of the house, it is written on the title deed.

If the title deed says that there is only the son's name and no daughter's name, legally speaking, the house already belongs to the son.

If, in the names of the sons and daughters, it belongs to the property of two people.

If the title deed is in the name of the parents and the parents are deceased, it belongs to the parents' estate.

If the parents have a will, they shall inherit according to the provisions of the will, and if there is no will, the son and daughter have the same right of inheritance. In this case, if you want to demolish your daughter, you can also get it.

You can inherit, if the hukou is still in the same place and has not moved out, it is all right compensation, even if there is no compensation, you must have the right to inherit.

An oral will is valid. But you have to have proof to prove it.

An oral will is just as valid, but it needs to be testified to by someone else.

It is valid if there is a witness, which is called an oral will.

Empty words are not allowed, even if someone testifies, it has no legal effect, only if a written will is left, signed by the old man, and signed by two witnesses, it will have legal effect.

There is no basis for oral claims, and you need to leave a self-written will with the help of a lawyer. Or make a will, in accordance with the legal process.

It is best to go to a notary office to have it notarized.

If the old man gives it to the old man in his lifetime, then it will be fine, if he doesn't give it, that is, the person is gone, if the old man's other children don't admit it, then there is no way to get the house, because there is no peace and no legal effect.

An oral agreement has no legal effect, and it is safe to have a will or maintenance agreement, and then go to a notary office to do justice.

Who pensions, the house will belong to whom, such a decision is very fair, but also very reasonable, no writing note may not be good, in fact, it should be written, not written evidence, that is, empty words, legal effect should have evidence, no evidence has no legal effect, it is best to leave a note, and to sign, if there are a few more witnesses it is better, so that it has legal effect,

If the legal heirs of the old man all agree with this fact, you can take possession of the entire house if you give up your share of the inheritance; If you do not recognize this fact, you need to prove the existence of this fact and let the court make a decision. But the case you said is more difficult to adduce evidence, and it is difficult to get the support of the court, and the house needs to be legally inherited in a high probability. If you have fulfilled your primary maintenance obligations, you can get more points according to the law.

If the old man is present, this statement has legal effect, and if there is no witness to testify, otherwise it has no effect.

The situation in rural areas is special, and if what the old man says is known to many people in the village, it can be regarded as a certificate and considered valid.

Personally, I think that there has always been such a saying, words have no basis, and words are based on evidence. Therefore, it is appropriate to make a written note.

It's best to have a handwritten agreement, and if not, someone with no direct interest relationship is needed to prove that the old man said such things!!

It has no legal effect, and in the countryside, it should be the real estate of the elderly who will be recognized for the elderly in the end.

It is also possible if there are witnesses to testify.

This is also in line with common sense and the law, who pays more, who pays more.

If the old man is in the old man, it has legal effect otherwise it will not take effect.

The parents' real estate is decided by the parents how to deal with it, although the real estate is promised to the daughter, but it cannot become the daughter's property without the transfer, and the son's debt forces the parents to sell the house. The palms of the hands and the backs of the hands are meat, and children should enjoy the same rights and duties as the family.

Parents should not give all their real estate to their daughters, and sons also have the right to get a share, and now your son is in debt and forces you to sell the house to pay off the debt, in fact, the parents' house and the children have no right to sell it.

This is only possible with parental consent.

Then you have to sell the house and give your sons and daughters a portion of the money.

Or find a way to borrow money to pay off the debt.

It's up to you to resolve. and the determination of your parents. Look at the real estate deed is not in your hand, how does he know, first of all, you are too honest, when you find out that he is trying to do this, you should say that the house has been transferred, it is yours.

to lie to him. That's not it. If you don't believe it, take a picture and show it to him.

The originals were not shown to him.

As a parent, I am also very embarrassed, I have promised you, and my son forced his parents to sell the house! How can you embarrass your parents, how will you live in the future, and will you have a happy old age? If there is a real estate dispute, your family conflict will deepen!

It mainly depends on the opinion of the parents! If the parents promised to give you the proof, they needed it! Proof that your parents gave you the property!

Even if you go to court because of real estate in the future, it is a sufficient proof! It will be a strong proof that you are competing for a property!

Since it has been promised to the daughter, although there is no transfer, but the parents should not change around, there will definitely be one party dissatisfied with this matter itself, rather than this, then what to do as originally said, and the son is already an adult, should not use this reason to force the parents to sell the house to pay off the debt, their own behavior is borne by themselves.

First of all, the parents just promised to give it, and it was still the property of the parents if there was no transfer. Parents can decide whether to give it to their daughter, and as for the son forcing his parents to sell the house to help him pay off the debt, it is only a request behavior, so the most important thing for parents to decide what to do. No one else can control it.

The real estate that the parents promised to give their daughter has to be given, and the son owes debts outside and needs his parents to sell the house to pay off the debt, the parents still think clearly, you can't refer to such a son in the future, although raising children to prevent old age, this society really can't prevent old age, since you promised to give it to your daughter, it's best not to regret it, in the end, the son can't point to it, and the daughter hates her parents.

First of all, the verbal promise should not be used as written materials and has no legal effect. You should ask your parents to go with you to the real estate office to transfer the property. In this way, the problem can be dealt with, and there is no need to worry about the parents selling the house. You know, you have to pay attention to the law in everything.

Since the property rights still belong to the parents, it should be up to the parents to decide what to do with the house, and the previous promise has no legal effect.

If the property rights belong to the parents, then it should be up to the parents to decide what to do with the house. Your parents have already given the house to their daughter. The son was in debt and forced his parents to sell the house.

It's hard to be a parent. I think that whether the transfer is transferred or not, the parents have decided, and they will do what the parents want. As for the debts owed by the son, the family sat together and discussed, and everyone worked together to help the son pay off the debt.

Solved the problem. The whole family gets along in harmony. Hope it helps.

I wish you all a happy family.