After being rescued, why did the parties have disputes with the property?

Now, with the improvement of people's quality of life, almost most of the newly built residential buildings are equipped with elevators to facilitate people's travel and life. However, elevators are not completely safe, and safety accidents caused by elevators are not uncommon. Recently, when Sister Luo and her sister took the elevator, they experienced a thrilling scene.

Two days ago, in Zunyi Middle Road, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, Sister Luo and her sister were about to take the elevator of the office building upstairs, but when taking the elevator, there was a sudden accident, and the two were accidentally trapped in the elevator, but fortunately, they were rescued by the property and were fine. <>

It stands to reason that at this time, Sister Luo should be grateful for the timely rescue of the property, but after Sister Luo was rescued, she had a conflict with the staff of the property. The staff of the property said that the reason why the elevator had an accident was not because of equipment problems, but because of an uncivilized behavior of Sister Luo, so the property asked Sister Luo to compensate accordingly. <>

The staff said that when they learned that someone was trapped in the elevator, they rushed to the scene as soon as possible to rescue Sister Luo and her sister, but when the staff asked why the elevator failed, Sister Luo became distracted and speechless. ** It shows that at 4:25 p.m. on the day of the accident, Sister Luo and her sister were laughing and playing in the elevator. <>

During the fight, Sister Luo pushed her sister, who accidentally hit the elevator door and the elevator suddenly stopped. Moreover, ** shows that after his sister hit the elevator, a large amount of dust suddenly poured in from the crack in the elevator door, so the staff believed that the elevator stop was caused by Sister Luo and her sister, and the elevator was damaged because of the forced opening of the rescue, so Sister Luo should compensate, but Sister Luo did not think so, and the two sides had a dispute. The elevator is not a place for laughter and play, and it is dangerous if you are not careful, so you must pay attention to your own safety when taking the elevator, especially the safety of children.

For money. Because Sister Luo was trapped due to her own reasons, and the elevator was damaged, she had to bear all the maintenance costs. After calling up the surveillance video in the elevator, the direct cause of the elevator failure was revealed.

To repair the elevator, it costs more than 20,000 yuan.

Because the property has to make the party pay 20,000 yuan for maintenance, this makes the party very dissatisfied.

The property believes that because the party and his sister were fighting in the elevator, they hit the elevator, which caused the elevator to malfunction. The party believes that there is a problem with the elevator itself that caused the accident. Therefore, the parties will have disputes with the property.

The daily maintenance and maintenance of the elevator is part of the scope of work of the property company, and the accident indicates that there is a problem with the work of the property, so the parties will have disputes with the property.

The attitude of the property is not good, because after the elevator is frightened, when the parties communicate with the property at home, the attitude of the property is very bad, so there will be disputes.

Elevator breakdowns are something we often encounter, and what a scary thing it would be to say that we were only trapped in an enclosed space for hours at the time. This is not in Beihai, Guangzhou, there is such a case, a girl was trapped in the elevator when she took the elevator alone, and she kept pressing the emergency button, but the property was ignored as a false alarm, until the parents looked for the girl to know that the trapped elevator sought help from firefighters, at this time the girl has been trapped for six hours, think about it is very afraid.

To put it simply, this is the irresponsibility of the property, what is the property, the property is not for the owner of the service, everyone at least the safety of the issue can be guaranteed. When someone asks for help, Hengju Duan Hou knows that he needs help, but ignores it as a false report, which is extremely irresponsible. No matter what position we work in, we must be responsible and responsible, which is the most basic bottom line, and we will not be able to do it sooner or later.

Since you get a salary, you have to do your job, I think even as a stranger will help when someone needs help**, not to mention that this is their duty, if you often face your work with such an attitude, it is the owner's misfortune. If you can't do your job well, then you have to take the corresponding responsibility. <>

It is not safe to be in the elevator for a long time, because it is in a closed space, and it is easy to cause hypoxic suffocation for a long time, which is a truth that everyone knows, knowing that someone is asking for help, and not asking, this is a disregard for other people's lives, it is too indifferent, the girl was locked in the elevator at that time How helpless and scared she should be, pinning her hopes on the property, but getting such an attitude, it is really chilling. <>

Such an unqualified property should have been replaced a long time ago, serious negligence, in case the girl really encountered any danger, it would be a serious safety accident, I hope that through this incident can sound the alarm bell.

I think this kind of irresponsible property is very infuriating, such a property they have not fulfilled their own responsibilities well, and the obligation is to bear some responsibility.

Such a property is simply irresponsible, and such a property is likely to affect the normal life and living experience of some owners.

This kind of irresponsible property must be reported and complained about them, which is a matter of human life.

The property of the community guarantees the safety of the owners, and the staff of the property can go to the property for the usual order of life and various problems encountered. Regarding a property owner in Jiangxi who was trapped in an elevator for 20 minutes and repeatedly asked for help from the property to no avail, how did he respond to the matter afterwards? I thought it was roughly as follows.

It is very dangerous to be trapped in the elevator, but the trapped person does not need to be too flustered, as long as he presses and holds the alarm button in the elevator in time, or hits **, there is no need to panic at all.

The amount of the community is very large, don't be afraid that you won't be discovered, the property is obviously unqualified, and it actually caused the owner to be trapped for so long, which is the company's dereliction of duty, and must apologize and compensate. Finally, the owner can sue the property management company for living in the community, but instead of getting the treatment he deserves, it threatens his own safety, and the relevant person in charge must give an explanation. The staff in the back office is not in place, so the owner waited so long and no one came to the rescue, although the elevator is not in danger of suffocation, but it is inevitable to be afraid in such a narrow space.

1. It is very dangerous to be trapped in the elevator, but the trapped person does not need to be too flustered.

As long as you press and hold the alarm button in the elevator in time, or call **, you don't need to panic at all.

2. The amount of ** in the community is very large, so you don't have to worry that you won't be discovered.

The property is obviously substandard, and it actually caused the owner to be trapped for so long, which is a dereliction of duty on the part of the company, and must apologize and compensate.

3. The owner can sue the property management company.

I live in the community, but I don't get the treatment I deserve, but threatens my safety, and the person in charge must give an explanation. The staff in the back office is not in place, so the owner waited so long and no one came to the rescue, although the elevator is not in danger of suffocation, but it is inevitable to be afraid in such a narrow space.

Regarding a property owner in Jiangxi who was trapped in an elevator for 20 minutes and repeatedly asked for help from the property to no avail, how did he respond to the matter afterwards? If you have anything else you would like to add, please leave a message below the comment area. If you also agree with this article, remember to like and follow.

The property company believes that this incident is mainly due to the owner's own problems, and they said that they have previously released the news that the residents' elevators are about to go out of power.

After reviewing the information, the owner said that he had successfully escaped from the predicament, and the matter was settled. However, the property in the community sent a WeChat threat not to publicize the matter. "Why are you walking in without looking at the power outage notice?

The owner was angry when he heard the property say this. Due to the power outage, the elevators in other buildings were turned off in advance, why are the elevators in their own communities still open? Subsequently, the owner complained about the matter to the relevant authorities.

The owner said that after the relevant departments intervened, the property claimed that the owner turned off the elevator power supply and ran in by himself to cause the trap.

The property may think that this is a trivial matter, although the trapped elevator is very dangerous, but think that the trapped person does not need to panic, as long as the alarm is pressed in time.

Yes, the property should check the situation inside the elevator in time, they are doing a bad job of doing that.

I think this is indeed a breach of responsibility on the part of the property, and if the property could have found out in time, there would have been no such thing.

It is indeed the default of the property, and the owner of the property is particularly vulnerable to danger, and the property is also particularly irresponsible.

I think that in this matter, there is a dereliction of duty. I also hope that the property can be more responsible after this matter comes out, because being trapped in the elevator is not a trivial matter, and it is likely that human life will be in danger.

I believe we all know one thing, that is, now the community is basically installed on the elevator, but the elevator is operated by a machine, so there will be problems to a certain extent, and then there is a button in the elevator after the problem, and the only thing that is bad will lead to the property as long as it is pressed. This is the property staff will find professional people to repair, this elevator, will rescue people.

However, there is a news on the Internet that has attracted the attention of netizens, that is, a property owner in Jiangxi has been trapped in the elevator for 20 minutes, and the property has been in a state of disconnection. In this case, I think there is a dereliction of duty on the part of the property. Because being trapped in an elevator is not a trivial matter, if it is not rescued for a long time, it is likely to lead to the life of the owner.

So if you are trapped in the elevator, you must go to the rescue as soon as possible and rescue him as soon as possible.

And the button in the elevator is leading to the property**, if the property can not be picked up in time**, then what if the people in the room have a lack of oxygen, or in case the people in the room have physical diseases? It's likely to be dangerous if you lose contact, so I hope the property will do their due diligence in this regard and never let the same thing happen again.

Because if the same thing happens again, it's likely that it won't end as well as it does now. The most important thing is that in the case of property default, he also quibbled that the person was not dead, not a big deal. It's not you who is locked in the elevator, and if it were you, would you still say something like that?

I think that the handling of the property is really not proper enough, and if it has been defaulted, I should try to save it and apologize as much as possible. But he didn't think that the owner had made a big deal out of it. I don't think it's right.

I think the property is very irresponsible, there is a serious dereliction of duty, because the elevator as a special equipment, related to the safety of passengers, logically speaking, the emergency button on the upper ridge can be quickly contacted. Calendar sales.

I feel that the property is very irresponsible, so I feel that the property should give an explanation and should compensate this owner for moral damages.

This can be said to be very incorrect, and I feel that this property is also very irresponsible, which is why it is like this.

Example: Mr. Long (pseudonym) took his 2-year-old nephew down the elevator when he suddenly fell ill and collapsed to the ground not long after. His nephew, unaware of his uncle's illness, walked out while the elevator doors were open.

Mr. Long sat in the elevator and kept staring at the camera inside, hoping that the security guards in the community could find out that something was wrong with him in the surveillance and then treat him. After waiting for a while, a woman came, and after seeing Mr. Long, she quickly left, without the slightest intention of saving him. Later, a water delivery worker saw that something was wrong with Mr. Long, so he called someone to send Mr. Long to the hospital for treatment, but he had missed the best rescue time.

Mr. Long's family was very sad and wanted to hold the property responsible, believing that they had not fulfilled their responsibilities and checked the monitoring in a timely manner, which led to Mr. Long's death.

Mr. Long died of illness and had little to do with the property

Although it is sad to pass away due to illness, Mr. Long's family should not blame Mr. Long's death on the property. The property also said that the real cause of Mr. Long's death was sudden cardiac death, and the security guard in their community was not a doctor, and the sudden illness and death of the resident had nothing to do with them, and they should not be held responsible. They also expressed regret for such an accident, but if the family insisted on putting all the responsibility on their heads, they were also very helpless.

After ineffective communication with the family, the property said that it would find a lawyer to follow up on the matter, hoping that the law could give the most fair judgment.

The property is wrong that no one looks at the surveillance during working hours

But to say that the property has no responsibility at all, the elevators in the community are generally monitored, and security guards should be arranged to take turns to check the monitoring to facilitate the management of the community. But this community obviously did not arrange this process, which is really not rigorous. The property management of the community should learn a lesson and send someone on duty to check the monitoring.

After all, the property charges a management fee, and there is still a certain responsibility for the residents.

But some netizens said that the community is so big, and if there are so many surveillance screens and security guards looking at them one by one, Mr. Long can't wait for the Lu people to be treated. But if someone looks at the monitoring, it is better than not optimistic, at least it can alleviate a lot of hidden dangers and prevent the recurrence of Mr. Long's illness that no one knows about.