Why do some people object to the collection of the Sutra of Amitayus? 50

Actually, it is not against the collection of books, but against the purity of advocating the circulation of the collection books. Empty Mage. What is there to oppose in the assembly book?

The assembly book was confirmed by the old monk Huiming, prefaced by the old monk Mei Guangxi, made a scientific judgment by Master Cizhou, made a judgment for the old monk Huang Nianzu, and wrote the scriptures for the old monk Zhao Puchu. The participation of these great monks has already been made clear by distinguishing the truth from the false. It is an indisputable fact that this sutra is a true scripture!

Nowadays, net. The old mage has passed away, and those who have attacked the net in the name of opposing the Assemble. The people of the empty mage should also stop.

The Wang family still has this loss, and future generations can pretend to be a family. Since there is the Sutra of Amitayus, why nothing happens. Wang's mistake, Master Lianchi pointed out, has not yet said why it is so today, because of the death of the three generations, that is, the nine products.

This book is a testament to the difficulty of gathering. One is to put an end to the delusion of future generations. Wei Moshen, and there is no need to be blind.

Bold and careless, not enough training.

Master Yinguang taught.

The part of the third epistle sent by the master of Yinguang in reply to Wang Zili. Wang Zili, a friend of Xia Lianju. After Xia Lianju completed the collection book, he hoped to get the support of Master Yinguang, and Master Yinguang replied to Wang Zili in three letters to oppose it.

The Xia Lianju assembly is not advocated by the patriarch, and you should not accept it.

It is recommended to read them separately one by one, although the content is similar, but there are still differences:

The "Sutra of Amitayus" that is circulating now is basically a collection of the old monks of Xia Lianju, and there were at least five versions of the "Sutra of Amitayus" in the past, and many people do not know which version to read. The Forty-Eight Vows of Amitabha Buddha are the core of the Sutra of Amitayus, no matter which version should be the same, different versions are only a little different in wording, but generally introduce the origin of Amitabha Buddha, the forty-eight vows, the beauty of the Pure Land of Bliss and the suffering of the world of sava.

Regarding several translations of "The Buddha Says the Sutra of Amitayus", Master Yinguang said, "Amitayus Rulaihui (Tang translation) is good in literature and science. (Yinguang Master Wen Yuan 3 Volume 2 Fu Wang Liju Book 2) Master Yu Yi's work "Fahai Guanlan", the Pure Land Essentials is also used in the Tang translation. Scholars believe that among the translations, Yasumoto is the best.

There has always been disagreement among the Buddhist scholars that the translator of Yasumoto has been arguing that this sutra should be translated by Zhu Fa Hu in his master's degree at the Institute of Religious Studies of the University of South China (1994). If Yasumoto is indeed the protector of the Zhu Fa, there are still 1,000.

Seven or eight hundred years. Perhaps due to the defects of the original Sanskrit text, or the omissions in the process of circulation and copying, there are some imperfections in the Yasumoto. However, the flaws are not concealed, and it has always been adopted by the religious circles, especially most of the ancestors of the Pure Land Sect.

The Chinese translation and Yasumoto are both 20 verses and 80 sentences, but they are five words, with a total of 400 characters, which is eight more than Yasumoto. Yasumoto has a total of 320 characters, in other words, even if the meaning of the two sides is the same, the Chinese translation uses a quarter more words than Yasumoto, so the judgment is high. Xia Huiben is mostly straightforward, and rarely uses metaphors, which is a little bland compared to Yasumoto.

Among them, there are only special words to praise the "Buddha's light", but there is a lack of praise for the Buddha's "face", which may not be in the original text, so some people think that they cannot be blamed. Yasumoto's "bright and powerful phase shakes the great thousand", which is vivid and profound, righteous and economical, and simple in words, in comparison, natural Yasumoto is slightly better.

In Yasumoto's sentence "the sun and moon are mani, the pearl is shining", the "pearl" corresponds to the former "mani", and completes its name. Mani beads emit "light", the sun is extremely hot and makes fire, so there is "flame", and the word "yao", the dictionary interprets as "light irradiation", in line with the characteristics of moonlight, the whole sentence is neat, and the words are accurate. But Xia Hui's skills are not enough.

Therefore, it is advisable to read Yasumoto's Sutra of Amitayus carefully, and not to read it together with the Xia Shu.

I insist on reciting Yasumoto's Buddha Sutra of Amitayus every day, because the book was translated in the Cao Wei period, more than 1,700 years ago, when the great monks gathered, and in the period of the Dharma, very close to the Buddha, we should believe in Yasumoto, believe in the ancients, and do not do.

Yes, it's just that the collection of Xia Lian Lao is more perfect, and Xia Lian Lao is said to be the Fuxian Bodhisattva again.

Of course.

Read all the versions for a better understanding.

If you only read one version, that's fine.

During the time when I was practicing the Medicine Master Method, I read both the Xuanzang version of the Medicine Master Sutra and the Yijing version of the Seven Buddha Sutras.

Reading the two versions in contrast can help to understand.

Hello and sincerely. It's just that the collection of Xia Lian Lao is more perfect, and Xia Lian Lao is said to be the Bodhisattva of Fuxian again

No matter which version is the same, don't be discriminatory.

Qia Heng Chinese Network Go and see.