In the debate on whether you should read aloud in the morning, I am the opposite, kneeling and beggi

I think that's the opposite of that satisfaction, I think it's important to read aloud, (reading aloud is likely to disturb the rest of others), that's for sure, but it's impossible, because I think you're asking about students reading, reading at school, i.e. reading in the morning.

What are the benefits of reading in the morning, while reading in the morning will help you a lot in your studies, but reading aloud will also dry your mouth. So this time period is not suitable for reading aloud, of course, there is no problem with reading, you can be quiet).

I don't agree with this statement either, how did the ancients read? It is to read aloud, and the process of reading is still shaking people's heads, don't laugh, we see this kind of ancients on TV will laugh when they read books, it is scientific, and the small one is to promote cerebral blood circulation, the neck is not boundary, etc. There are many benefits through reading, deepening memory is the greatest, and there are good benefits to you speaking, pronunciation standards, etc., you go online to check how Li Yang reads English, and you have to hold a coin in your mouth, and you read that there are sores on the mouth and tongue, and sores on the mouth and tongue are also a competition for the ancients to read.

Reading aloud and reading silently is absolutely not effective in reading aloud and is one of the most effective ways to exercise memory.

From the perspective of the public, most people are still resting in the morning, and reading aloud is likely to disturb the rest of others; Although reading in the morning can be a great help for studying, reading aloud can also dry your mouth. So this time period is not suitable for reading aloud, of course, there is no problem with reading, you can be quiet).

No, just having breakfast in the morning and reading aloud may cause gastrointestinal discomfort.

Question, now that the burden of middle school students is very heavy, there is almost no time to study, how can I study if I don't have time?

Why do middle school students read a lot?

The so-called reading of 10,000 books is not as good as traveling 10,000 miles, society is a big tree, and even everyone is a book, recording the bits and pieces of their life, doing more, good memory is not as good as a bad pen, write more, understand, and understand the author's heart, reading a book is equivalent to becoming a good friend of the author, understanding their minds.

Middle school students are under heavy academic pressure, facing many important turning points in their lives such as the high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination, and reading a large number of extracurricular books wastes time and energy.

Of course, it depends on the situation on the field. It's not an argument.

Comic books are meant to be read less because they can turn a good child into a child.

Open book is good This sentence is right! Reading can give a person a lot of insight.

Reading useless books is a waste of time;

The books read may not be understood, and mistakes are likely to occur.

Read bad books.

First, it will limit people's thinking and make it difficult to innovate. Second, it is easy to become a nerd, talk on paper, and degrade the ability to work hard.

This debate topic is difficult, if you only argue theoretically, you will definitely be at a disadvantage, you can only give more examples, and look for evidence from examples, such as Fan Jinzhong

Upstairs there are ideas, but they don't fully grasp the debate.

First of all, this debate topic is very biased and has big flaws. Society's default is to help others. The question of the debate is "should or should not", which should be changed to "should help strangers" and "can not help strangers", because your "should not" is more comprehensively concluded to be completely no, and "can not" is left to be leeway.

In this way, it can be justified. The speed of the questioner has been changed.

Secondly, the ethical issues discussed upstairs will indeed be where you will be bullied. I can answer the upstairs question, "If the opponent sees an unknown person accidentally falling into the water, and the opponent knows how to be watery, will the opponent turn a blind eye or come forward?" "It's the type of problem.

Answer: The other party's deep understanding of water is first of all the premise that you gave me, not everyone is well versed in water, besides, even if they can swim, most of the people who drown are people who can swim. It's not that I don't want to save him, it's just that my jumping off isn't necessarily helping him.

The reason is that I don't have professional rescue skills, and he may carry me to the bottom of the sea. On the premise of helping strangers, the interests and safety of the helper must be guaranteed, otherwise it will chill anyone. If you can't be sure of the safety of the person helping others, you can't talk about helping.

Remember. You give too few points, so be it.

The building idea is not complete.

Master the debate. First, debate the topic.

Biased defects are compared by default.

The help don't. The debate question should be with that.

It should be changed to help Mo.

With the help of Mo. It should be more comprehensive.

Determine that it is complete, and it will remain.

Yu Cai argued.

The speed of the question is changed to its building.

Talking about ethical and moral issues is indeed bullying.

I replied to the floor and asked the defense friend to see.

Acquaintance with the prime. Be cautious when dropping into water.

Debaters are well versed in water.

May I ask the defense friend to see it?

Stand up type questions.

A: Knowing the water first.

Specific to me on the premise of each.

They are well versed in water-based and have the final say.

Drowning by swimming. Swim all the numbers.

Said I wanted to save me from jumping.

It doesn't necessarily help me.

Professional rescue skills maybe me.

And hug to the bottom of the sea.

Retain the original argument situation).

The help Mo. The premise must be guaranteed to help.

Security of interests. Otherwise let any.

Cold OK help don't.

Safety premise talk help.

Remember to give too little.

Peng Yu's case helped strangers to be framed, and there is a high cost and high danger in helping strangers.

In the afternoon, "Ding Zero Zero! "The teacher walked into the classroom and asked us to put together the materials for the debate.

Started, the teacher divided us into positive and negative sides, the positive side is beneficial to open the book, sitting on the north side, the negative side is not necessarily beneficial to open the book, sitting on the south side, as soon as the teacher finished speaking, the class became noisy, and some students hesitated to be the positive side or the negative side? Some students did not hesitate to sit on the side they chose.

The teacher looked at both sides with a smile and said, "Almost, start!" ”

The person on the square had already raised his hand, so the teacher called Wan'er, who raised her hand high, and Wan'er said softly and calmly: "As long as you read, there is always good!" The opponent immediately raised his hand at the same time, as if he wanted to refute Wan'er, the teacher called Chen Xiaoyang, and he said loudly

Blind opening may not be beneficial! At this time, Yang Yu, who was on the front side, raised his hands and said: "People who write write some beautiful words, don't you let these beautiful words be learned?"

Maybe he didn't say it properly, but many students on the positive side immediately raised their hands and said, "Teacher, I'll add."

On the other hand, Wang Haoteng waved his hand high, and he couldn't wait, as if he had a lot to say, the teacher called him, and he said: "Some books are not good, and the mind is not healthy, I think reading may not be beneficial!" ”

Lu Jiaxin, who was on the front side, raised his hand, stared at the opposite side and said: "I think that reading books has a clear purpose, and reading good books will definitely be beneficial!"

Cao Bingbing, who is square, said: "Poetry makes people smart, mathematics makes people fine, naturalism makes people profound, ethics makes people dignified, and rhetoric and logic make people good at argumentation, so I think it is beneficial to open the book!" ”

Li Qi, who is on the opposite side, said confidently: "Some bookstores sell crayon Xiaoxin, and primary school students can't read it well!" ”

We immediately retorted: "But you may also learn some idioms from it!" ”

Time flies so fast, and when class is about to end, the teacher said, "To read books, you have to choose books, which is called opening the book is beneficial."

The debate came to a successful conclusion in the "controversy".

1.Books are the ladder of human progress, and books are the source of human wisdom. Yes, it's true that I don't disagree, but back to the students now.

A: The books in my hand are more and more divided into many categories, and everyone has their own ambitions, just like I don't care what kind of books you read. But if you look at those meaningless books, what good will they do for you, and what will they do for you, and if you read those unhealthy books, you will make your pure heart dirty, and this is our view, "Open books are not necessarily beneficial." ”

1.There are many types of books, and if students choose the wrong books, they will lead them astray or lead to unhealthy thinking.

2.Spending too much time on non-nutritious books is not good for people, and it may also lead to the loss of study, and most importantly, it is a waste of time.

It is often said, "It is good to open a book, but it is good to read a book." However, on closer inspection, this statement is not entirely true.

If we are interested in every book, then "open books are beneficial" is not necessarily beneficial. Today's classmates may like to read martial arts, romance only **, books and periodicals, sometimes to the extent of forgetting to sleep and eating, and not letting go of the book, once they are lost in books, they will go crazy, then they only think about books in class, and they don't have the heart to study, and their grades will plummet. There are also people who are attracted by some of the plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes go down the path of crime.

Isn't this a harm to yourself by reading books? This is just the first layer included in "unbook is not necessarily beneficial": unbook is not necessarily beneficial.

There is also a second layer, which is that we read books and have a choice. Don't read books that aren't healthy and don't help us much. If we want to read books, we should read some books that are conducive to our physical and mental health, and helpful to our study and life.

Such a book is a good book, and only by reading a good book will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends, reading good books, that is, making good friends, will progress; If you don't read a good book, of course, you will make friends with people who can't make friends, and then you will regress. Because those who are close to Zhu are red, and those who are close to ink are black!

So, only good books will be good for you. Therefore, my point is that open books are not necessarily beneficial.

I sincerely hope that every student can choose to read. And don't ruin your life by reading the wrong book, leading yourself astray.

Unbook is not necessarily beneficial. Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness. Since books are medicine. Then there is poison and antidote.

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining a mine." Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Red dates are harmful to your teeth; The medicine is good for the body, but it also has side effects.

The British writer Fielding said: "A bad book is like a bad friend, and it may kill you." If you have a one-sided understanding of "open books are beneficial" and let all books be read, without choosing or asking about the content, it will be beneficial to read it, which is actually not true!

We must learn a skill, and choose the most valuable and perceptual good books that are suitable for us to read. So, I want you to remember that opening a book is not necessarily beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is entirely correct.

Bishgatyu in Gogol's "Dead Ghosts", who reads everything, is not a well-educated man, but a fool who lacks connoisseurship; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi Lie Imperial Crown", he learned a special dragon killing technique, in fact, there is no place to kill dragons, he understands that there is no dragon in the world, and his skills are also learned. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will always get twice the result with half the effort, and the harm will be more and less! In the same way that people who are able to consume the necessary nutrients are healthier than those who eat a lot, the real scholars are often not those who read a lot of books, but those who read useful books.

— Aristib is worse than not reading a book that is not suitable for him than not reading at all. We must have the ability to choose the most valuable and most suitable reading materials for our needs. — Belinsky people are alive, books are dead.

A living person can read a dead book and read it alive. Dead books read the living, and people can be read dead. - Guo Moruo became a slave to the book, and took the living to death.

If books are used as human tools, the knowledge in books will be lived. It's alive. —Hua Luogeng.

Real dishes, nonsense, I know too, useless.

I don't think open books are necessarily beneficial, and if you read a book that doesn't make sense for you to read for yourself, why would you want to read it?

Go for four! If you don't, others will! I want to put it myself! Yes!

I can only tell you some methods, not how to write it.

Because I'm also writing about this topic for reading, I can only tell you what can be written in the material.

May I? Come to me if you can!!