Help me choose cameras Sony W130 and Canon A720

Just look at the severe purple fringing on the W130**, if the silhouette of the person and object is purple in a sunny environment outside, can you buy this kind of camera?

The A720 has a fully manual and high-magnification lens, which is also a tough parameter that the W130 cannot match.

I think W130 is basically a model that doesn't need to be considered and compared, and some others, such as Fujifilm F50FD, Samsung NV11 can still be compared with the following.

The ixus70 is a classic model, its selling point is that it is light and flexible, the screen effect is excellent, and the imaging is relatively good, but the night scene performance ability is relatively weak, and at the same time, it does not have image stabilization, and its applicability is not strong when the light is low.

Canon's, I even bought Sony's, and I regret dying I really didn't lie to you

Canon's. After all, it is a professional camera maker. And Canon's technology is also quite advanced.

Canon for sure! You use something else and then use Canon to know what professionalism is. Sony used by my classmates,I don't know the model,Anyway, the frame is super small when shooting,10 million pixels,The light sensitivity is not as good as mine when the light is poor,Mine is A570

Choose Canon, Sony don't think about it at all.

My first machine was Sony, hey, I'm disappointed, now I bought Fujifilm, or buy Canon, although the A720 doesn't look good, but the imaging is definitely better than Sony!!

The Sony W130 I bought, except for the lower pixel of the display, the others are very easy to use, especially suitable for families with children, easy to operate, as long as the professional requirements are not high.

This is a product produced before 2007 will have a slanted screen problem,If you buy it now,It can only mean that the person who bought the camera is a stupid x,Remember to buy products after 2007......

Just look at the severe purple fringing on the W130**, if the silhouette of the person and object is purple in a sunny environment outside, can you buy this kind of camera?

Severe? How serious is it? If it's like this, it can only be said that what he bought or what he saw was only a matter of a single Sony product.

I used the Sony T300, Sony's exterior design, Canon, Nikon and other unbeatable, Sony's imaging is sharp, colorful, and somewhat distorted......

Sony W130 and W150 can basically be eliminated, why, because you said you care about imaging ......

The A720 and 80 have been my recommendations lately.

Canon 7.2 million pixels, 6x optical zoom Canon lens, inch 10,000-pixel LCD

2. When it comes to home cameras, everyone will definitely think of Canon A series products, and this is one of the reasons why Canon A720 IS is selling well. In addition to the advantages of brand appeal, the most fundamental reason why Canon A720 IS can continue to sell well in the first half of 2008 is not only that it has a price reduction of nearly 400 yuan in half a year, but also because of its complete and powerful shooting function.

3. It can be said that in addition to the slightly lower LCD quality, the A720 IS has almost no defects, integrating large zoom capabilities, complete manual**, IS optical image stabilization and 1cm macro shooting capabilities. Before the Panasonic LZ8 was not launched, among the 8 million pixel cameras under 2000 yuan, in terms of various shooting performance, there was absolutely no product that could be as complete as the Canon A720 IS.

The Canon ixus80 IS, priced under $1900 in Beijing.

It is an upgraded version of the function of the popular king of card machines, ixus 70, the shape is elegant and simple, judging from the user's reaction, the feel of shooting is still good.

The inch CCD is equipped with 800W effective pixels, which is very sufficient for ordinary household use. Consumer DCs with more than 1000W pixels are simply wasteful.

3. Needless to say, Canon's lens has sharp imaging and good color reproduction, so there is nothing to say. Although there is no advantage in shooting at the wide-angle end, it is generally sufficient. 3x light change, simple telephoto shooting is still OK.

4. The macro reaches 3cm, which is not much different from the effect of 1cm. It uses a telescopic lens with a maximum aperture, which is much more light than other brands of periscope.

5-inch screen, 23W pixels, good display.

Not much else, this camera is a good choice for ordinary home use. There are also colors such as white, silver, blue, pink, and brown.

In terms of imaging, in terms of handling, A720 is stronger than 80, what are the shortcomings? The screen pixel is a bit low, and the appearance is not as good as 80.

The A720 now has no slanted screen issues.

An oblique screen is when one side of the screen is protruding from the bezel and the other side is recessed.

You can see it at a glance with your eyes, and you don't have to worry about being fooled at all.

On performance. The A720 is the most powerful of the four.

If the budget is sufficient.

The A650 is also not bad, the performance is more powerful than the A720 and the A700 is as such.

The A720 is now 1650

First of all, I don't choose Sony

Reason: Unprofessional.

Sony's camera is very famous, but have you heard that Sony has his own lens, and the camera is not like a digital product like *** The camera has a lot of optical knowledge in it, Sony's advertisement says that he uses Zeiss, and the lens of Leica is so good In fact, what is exposed behind it is the weak technical support of his own brand If he has his own lens, what can he do with someone else's (can save a lot of costs).

So, I don't choose Sony

As for the canon's 720 and 80 I prefer the 720

Because I liked his full manual work, and he was able to fully experience the joy of photography.

If you don't have any requirements for the appearance, in fact, I would prefer to let you see that the A650 is not at all a grade machine with 720 80, but the corresponding is much higher than the 720 80 (now 650 is different all over the country** My 2350 silver).

The 720 and 80 you said are both 1 CCD, but 720 is 6 times the light change, 80 is only 3 times, and the 720 is AA battery powered, 80 is lithium battery, 80 is out of power, you have to hold on, 720 is out of power, you can have 4 sections of Nanfu on the side of the road, and then there will be another hundred or so sheets.

So the battery life of the 720 is better than the 80 Of course, the appearance is not as thin as the 80 But the appearance is completely up to the individual Some people just like the bigger ones and feel professional.

Try it, see with your own eyes, judge with your brain.

I'm in the same situation as you now. In the end, I chose the Canon 80

The selection of the machine can not only look at the parameters, nor can you just look at the functions advertised on the advertisement, you must actually use it to know. Since I am doing this business, I have used both machines, here, I will not repeat the parameters of the two, just talk about the feeling of use.

Comparatively speaking, the 590 has the following handling advantages.

1: It is better than 130 for capturing moving objects and avoiding blur

2: When you take pictures with a handheld camera, it feels better than 130.

3: The battery is out of power halfway, disposable batteries can be bought everywhere, and there is no need to find a power supply to charge, which is convenient.

4: Switch on and off and the response speed of the machine, slightly faster than 130

5: The color is softer than 130, which is better for portrait shooting.

6: If you need to expand the memory or purchase additional batteries, the investment is relatively low.

Comparatively speaking, 130 has the following to borrow a 590 that it does not have.

1: Easy to carry, fashionable and beautiful.

2: You can process the ** of shooting, which is equivalent to a simple immediate ps, with eight effects, a function that seems to be very fancy, but it is actually very practical.

3: Smiley shutter function, smile at the machine, he will automatically take a picture. This feature isn't very useful, because even if you turn the smile recognition to the maximum, you'll still need to smile in a fixed pose to be caught by the camera. But this feature is fun.

4: Lithium battery, fast charging and discharging, battery life is much better than 590 AA battery, one charge can shine more than 350.

5: High contrast and color saturation, sharp imaging eye color, especially suitable for expressing scenery.

6: Sony licensed goods are officially guaranteed by Sony for two years, which is one year more than the 590.

7: There are four eye colors to choose from.

If it were me, I would choose 590For a gay man like me who doesn't use a camera very often, but there are a lot of times when he doesn't record it and feels pity, 590 is more suitable. As for you, you can choose the right one according to your own use.

Canon, Sony and Nikon pay special attention to invoices when warranting, so it is not recommended to buy parallel goods. If you have to buy it, I really can't say anything about parallel goods. Licensed goods also depend on the purchase from**, if you buy it in a place like Science and Technology City, you generally don't bring anything, you can issue an invoice or not open it (it is recommended to issue an invoice), buy it in a home appliance store such as Suning Gome, and generally give you a 1G or 2G SD card, as well as a set of rechargeable AA batteries, and a camera bag.

Canon A590

====Canon! = Canon official**: 1580 yuan.

The market price is about: about 1300 yuan.

The Canon A590 is better than the Sony W130 in terms of imaging results, manual functions, battery and memory card versatility, and the A590 is the first choice for home and videography entry.

W130 8.1 million pixels, lithium battery, 4X optical, inch screen, face detection, smiley shutter, **1300 or so, more cost-effective, and Sony's machine imaging and color are very good, home use is very good, buy directly.

It's not a high-grade camera, but it's naturally good at a high price.

The Ixus 90 has a higher hardware configuration than the W130.

Comparing DC is more than 2 aspects.

Size. 2.Lens quality.

W130 is 1

The ixus 90 is 1

90 to have an advantage.

On the quality of the lens.

Model Zoom Factor Distortion at the Wide-Angle End Distortion at the Telephoto End.

Sony W130 4

ixus 90 is/ 3/

2% is average, below 2%, distortion is not noticeable, and almost negligible.

Judging from the above data, the distortion of the wide-angle end of the two is about the same, W130 is slightly better, but it is not distinguishable by the naked eye, and these two wide-angle end shots are relatively fat.

The distortion at the telephoto end is that the W130 is more serious.

In addition, the 90 is a 3-inch screen that seems to be more in line with the requirements of MM love fashion.

Exclusion** factor Ixus 90 is recommended

Sony's chip is well done, Canon's camera is well done, the two are relatively speaking, Sony's style is better than Canon, ** is also cheaper than Canon, but Canon's performance in all aspects is better than Sony's, if you want to buy, several** functions are almost the same, it must be Canon's good.

Of course it's sony's, and that's what I use.

Of course, if you buy Canon, I recommend that you add some money to buy 85, 10 million pixels are very cost-effective, and 80 is about to be eliminated.

Now 85 should be about 1650 (licensed).

Such a Sony in the camera is not comparable to Canon In terms of parameters, they are not much different, but the effect of shooting is x80 is much better I think x80 is a very cost-effective machine x85 The effect of taking pictures is similar to x80 They are all card machines, and they can't be compared with SLR when taking pictures! I suggest the landlord to buy x80!

Of course the Canon is good!

Canon is much more professional than Sony in optics.

The W130 screen is very poor, so it is recommended not to buy it.

Friends on the first floor, I see that you don't have back pain when you stand and talk.

Buy a Sony camera to use first, and then criticize.

If you shoot people and scenes, Nikon colors are better.

For macro and evening shots, the Canon is better. Everything else is pretty much the same.

Sony's camcorders.

Canon's DSLR.

Personal understanding.

It is recommended that you buy Canon's card players from Sony and Nikon, and the picture quality is not as good as Canon's.

One is produced by Sony and the other is produced by Canon, and there is no other difference. Any camera, with good use, is the best

All three ** are about the same, but in terms of cost performance, I recommend the J150, which has the largest number of pixels and zoom factor among the three cameras, and it also has a wide angle.

After all, Sony Canon has a big brand cost in it...

Sony W130,I bought one,It's pretty good,Although it's a little expensive,But it's a shot.,It's both fashionable and easy to use.,The current price should be around 1300!