The fee for make up classes in the third year of high school was reported by parents! Is it against

In fact, the Ministry of Education has given clear regulations, requiring teachers not to make up for paid lessons, otherwise they will be dealt with in violation of rules and disciplines, and the senior high school teacher charged students for make-up lessons was reported by parents. In response to this question, Mr. Xiaojiang will share a few personal views.

Clause. First, it is the right practice for parents to report the teacher's paid make-up class, first of all, we should affirm that it is very correct for parents to report the charge of the third year of high school teachers, because the Ministry of Education has given relevant regulations, requiring teachers to make up for pay, if the teacher does not comply with the relevant regulations, but also to charge for the student to make up the class, then it is a violation of discipline, so parents dare to stand up and report the teacher, it is also commendable, and it can really make other teachers take it as a warning and no longer pay for the students. Even indiscriminate charges for students and parents.

Clause. Second, for the behavior of teachers to carry out paid make-up classes, it must be banned that teachers should not be selfish, seek personal interests, and give students paid make-up classes, which is a violation of the relevant regulations, teachers should not knowingly commit crimes, should not be interested in interests, but should consciously abide by the relevant regulations, know how to start from themselves, and resolutely resist the behavior of paid make-up classes, so as to ensure the fairness of education.

In order to seek personal self-interest, teachers pay for students to make up lessons, not only for other students are not responsible, but also for personal irresponsibility, teachers who make up for paid lessons will pay for their own misconduct, and even lose their jobs, so teachers should not have a fluke mentality, trying to make up lessons for students for personal gain.

The relevant departments should also ban the improper behavior of teachers giving paid make-up lessons to students in accordance with the law, and severely punish them once they are discovered, so as to set an example.

Clause. 3. Teachers can make up lessons for students, but they can't charge for some students who are not strong in learning ability and can't keep up with the progress of classroom learning, teachers can take out personal time to make up lessons for these students, but they can't charge students' parents for this, and it is not the teacher's responsibility and obligation to make up lessons for students.

Therefore, what we should put an end to is that teachers are paid to make up classes, and teachers should not be allowed to make up lessons for students, teachers use their rest time to make up lessons for students, in fact, they are doing good deeds, and teachers can also be recognized and respected by parents, but if teachers deliberately charge students and parents for make-up classes in order to seek personal interests, and carry out paid make-up classes, then teachers not only violate the relevant regulations, but also difficult to win the respect of students and parents.

Two days ago, I read an article about a case in a public school in Gansu Province where a parent reported that "32 days of make-up classes cost 510 yuan". This incident has caused a heated discussion among netizens. Some people think that what parents are doing is wrong; Some people think that the school is learningFees should not.

There are quite a few cases of "third-grade make-up classes in public schools reported by students or parents". Previously, there was a ** report that the senior high school students of a middle school in Anhui publicly reported on the Internet that their school used the holiday (summer vacation) to organize high school juniors to make up classes and collect illegal fees. The classmate said:

The school organizes more than 40 hours of tutorial classes before and after, charging 800 yuan. The authorities reacted quickly and ordered the school to stop making up classes and refund tuition fees.

It is reasonable to say that there is nothing wrong with the school organizing make-up classes for senior high school students. Senior high school students face the upcoming college entrance examination directly and need to fill the gaps through more intensive study methods. If the school arranges for teachers to make up lessons for students, there will naturally be some fees, and it makes sense to charge some fees.

However, charging students tuition fees for cram schools may conflict with the relevant policies of the education administrative department, so it is very sensitive to "organize cram classes for senior high school students and charge a certain fee". So, should public schools charge for "make-up classes"? The author believes that if we grasp these two points well, there will be no big problems.

The first point: the implementation of "on-demand make-up classes"., rather than "making up lessons for everyone".Although it is necessary to organize make-up classes for high school students, not every high school student has to make up classes. Some students have strong learning ability and are able to digest and absorb the learning content on their own, and do not need to attend classes; Some students have no motivation to go to college.

Before organizing a cram school, the school must communicate fully with the student and their parents to determine if the student is willing to open a cram school.

Secondly, it is well known that all the actions of public schools must be approved by the higher education authorities, and the organization of cram schools for senior high school students is no exception. If the school has such a plan,Close communication should be maintained with the education administration and relevant work should be carried out with consent. At the same time, the school should also report the implementation plan and teaching arrangements to the education management department for the record.

If the higher education administration does not approve the school's remedial arrangements, the school may not take any remedial action, even if:"Free remediation classes"。

Oppose make-up classes. Because if it is an extracurricular make-up class, it is reasonable to pay for it. Most of the objections are to the practice of making up classes, because students are inherently stressed, and adequate breaks should be given outside of class.

I think it's against the charge. Some parents are psychologically unbalanced, they think that teachers should make up lessons for free, and if they charge money, it is unreasonable.

It must be against the fee, let the teacher try it for free, and all parents will rush to bring their children here.

There is opposition to fees because the fees charged by these tutors are very high.

Make-up classes can be implemented during the winter and summer vacations in schools, with voluntary participation by students, parents, and teachers. Take 60 days of summer vacation to calculate (6 hours of class a day, no homework arrangement), 30 yuan per student per day, a total of 1,800 yuan for 60 days (most families can take out), 50 people in each class have a total income of 90,000 yuan, 50,000 yuan of teacher salary (5 main subject teachers can, 5,000 salary per month), 2,000 yuan for water and electricity, and the rest of the income to the school's daily expenses. In addition, the school's classrooms are idle during the winter and summer vacations, teachers have nothing to do, and parents have no time to take care of their children ......All problems will be solved.

Definitely against the charge! That's how parents are being selfish now.

Of course, it's against the charge.

Some parents are satisfied with the make-up class, oppose the fee, ignore the teacher's labor, buy clothes, shoes and buy a car are not distressed, and when they encounter the payment of the make-up class, they will talk about the east and west, the school teacher and the principal are hard-hearted, 45 minutes and a minute do not care, depending on what the parents say, their brains are in water.

Parents welcome make-up classes and oppose fees, and students should oppose fees and oppose make-up classes