History questions, ask for a detailed explanation History questions, to analyze

In April 1919, Liang Qichao, who was in Europe, sent a telegram to the Foreign Affairs Committee in Beijing: "As for the German matter, I heard that it will be directly returned to Qingdao, because the Japanese envoys are fighting, and as a result, the pod law is moved.

a Liang Qichao has a strong sense of patriotism.

b Liang Qichao agreed with the younger students.

c Liang Qichao saw the essence of imperialism clearly.

d Liang Qichao has become an anti-imperialist and anti-feudal fighter for democracy.

The question is incorrect, isn't it obvious that item d is wrong? Liang Qichao has never been able to be regarded as an anti-imperialist and anti-feudal fighter for democracy, and at that time (1919), he was still classified as a conservative (royalist). And let's take a step back and say that it is impossible to draw this conclusion from the historical data given in the title alone.

If you think about it, isn't that the case?

The reason for choosing D is that Liang Qichao's reform at that time was not to oppose feudalism, but to change the law with the support of the emperor to improve governance, so there is no anti-feudalism.

Note that the time is in 1919, the May Fourth Movement broke out, isn't the May Fourth Movement the first thorough, uncompromising, anti-feudal movement in Chinese history? That Liang Qichao is just a confused, and other people should also awaken to be anti-feudal democracy fighters, so choose D. Hope to adopt!

This sentence is all too obvious wrong. The hat of anti-imperialist and anti-feudal democracy fighter has always been used by people like Lu Xun, and it is not appropriate to evaluate Liang Qichao as too young, and Liang Qichao's life experience is too much, and his political attitude has changed too much. Judging from the question.

Liang Qichao's words only show that he saw that the imperialism of the Paris Peace Conference was a raccoon dog and opposed the resolution of the Peace Conference, and did not reflect that he was anti-imperialist and anti-feudal, and his words did not involve democracy.

ca, "despite the fact that social life is specifically detrimental to citizens. This does not reflect the fact that the city-state society harms the interests of citizens.

b, to achieve true equality, such absolute words are generally incorrect options, not to mention the word "but", which shows that it is not true equality.

c, correct, "the law plays a balancing role in this system, it is the norm of equality". Legally, civil politics operate equally.

d, false, contrary to the title, with reference to "the law plays a balancing role within this system, it is the norm of equality".

In Democracy and the Weakening of the City-State, he states: "Within the [Athenian] polis the citizen is regarded politically as an interchangeable monolith within the system, in which the law plays a balancing role, the norm of equality, despite the fact that social life is specifically unfavorable to the citizen." "One of the following is accurate: (a) the social life of the city-state harms the interests of citizens; b. citizens achieve true equality before the law; c. the law guarantees the functioning of civic politics; d. the political rights of citizens of the city-state are not protected.

Choose C. Analysis: A only reflects the first half of the material; bIt is wrong to say that true democracy has not been achieved, because only Athenian citizens (adult men) have democratic rights; d is wrong because all citizens are equal before the law.

First of all, you can directly exclude b and d, and b doesn't need to be explained. True equality was not achieved, and item d was not reflected in the material. The statement in item A is inconsistent with the thrust of the material and mainly refers to the role of the law.

The law is not an unlimited law. To a certain extent, the interests of the people have been harmed. But it also greatly protects the people. Choose C.

After Solon's reforms in Athens, inequality of property replaced inequality of status and was guaranteed in the form of law.

Is this a question from there?