Are parents obligated to take care of their children?

There is no legal obligation, but if the mother-in-law or mother-in-law does not stretch out a hand, the daughter-in-law or aunt will also feel uncomfortable, after all, when you are old, you also need the help of your daughter-in-law or son-in-law.

The daughter-in-law doesn't provide for her in-laws. Whoever has the surname with the child!

No, because I know, so I'll give them the best old age.

There is certainly no obligation, but most parents in China will lend a helping hand to their children when they are in trouble, but children must be grateful.

There is no such obligation, the old people nowadays, such as my parents, are very ideological, they don't have to work, they don't have any burdens, because when they were young, they suffered a lot and earned some money, all of which were used to buy houses. It's off topic, I'm about to give birth, it's better to say that they will help take care of the child in the future (why not let the mother-in-law take it, because she is 70 years old and can't take it), and give them money every month, which is equivalent to hiring a nanny, but it is more attentive than the nanny. I also understand them, after all, they are their own parents, they are used to being idle, and they are so tired with children....I also plan to save more money, I can spend more time with my children in the future, if I want to blame them, I will do it at first, but I think of those parents abroad who have never helped their children take care of their children, and their parents do not owe us, but we owe it and have not paid it back, so we can only blame ourselves for making too little money, not being able to afford a nanny, and our parents are tired.

There is no doubt that the child's grandparents and maternal grandparents have no legal obligation to raise and guardian their grandchildren. Unless the parents are deceased, or the parents are unable to support the child, there can be a grandparent or maternal grandparent who can be the guardian and guardian of the child.

There is no obligation. It is the obligation of the child's parents to educate the child, not the grandparents and grandparents, and the elders take the child to help, but it is definitely not an obligation.

There is no obligation. Although my mother is taking care of the child with me, I know that this is not what she should do, so I am very grateful to her, but because of the special geographical relationship of my marriage, it is not good that she is not around, and my parents themselves will not worry about me or the child, so they come to accompany me. But I was relatively unproductive, and I didn't listen to them very much at that time, so now I am a full-time mother, and I hope that one day I can have the opportunity to repay them as much as I can.

If you are single, you will say that you have no obligations, and you may have a different opinion when you get married and have children. For ordinary working families, life will be more difficult without the help of the elderly. There are no obligations, but that's where we are.

If there is only obligation and no affection between parents and children, it is too cold.

There is no obligation to help with the child. Although there is no obligation, many grandparents and grandparents will take the initiative to help take care of the children, one is to share the worries of their children, but like their little grandchildren. There are also old people who don't like to take children, don't force them, after all, the old people are old, and their health is not as good as that of young people.

So try to bring your own or hire a nanny, don't feel that the elderly have the obligation to take care of the children and get angry and make the family relationship tense.

Helping you is love, not helping you is common feeling, it can't reach the level of obligation at all, when such thoughts arise, we must first reflect, what have we done for our parents? Are we going to do something for them? When we are in trouble, we think of our parents, do we also have to think about what we can do for our parents?

Don't just ask for it, but give it.

Legally, parents only need to raise their children until they are 18 years old, and parents are not obliged to raise or bring their grandchildren, but the Chinese ideology agrees that parents should help them take care of their children.

Summary. Dear, China's Civil Code does not stipulate that parents have the obligation to help their children take care of their children.

Dear, China's Civil Code does not stipulate that parents have the obligation to help their children take care of their children.

Dear, China's Civil Code does not stipulate that parents have the obligation to help their children take care of their children.

However, our Chinese nation has traditionally had a strong sense of family, and the phenomenon of multiple generations living together is relatively common, and it is relatively common for family members to help and take care of each other among generations.

Oh, thank you.

You are welcome! If there are new problems, <>

Feel free to contact me.

Good. Thank you for your compliments and thank you for your support <> my work

Hello! Parents are not obligated to help their children with their children! From a legal point of view, it is a kind of family affection and not a necessary obligation for parents to help their children with their children.

In other words, parents are just extending their love for their children to their grandchildren, and there is nothing wrong with them not doing this.

Walking through the campus gate of the elementary school, you can see many elderly people, who take the task of picking up and dropping off children to themselves. Taking care of children is actually a science, especially in today's era, children are the center of the whole family, and the meaning of raising children has changed from being well fed and clothed to all-round development and mental health.

Today's young people generally have a high level of education and a strong sense of independence, and they understand that they are separate individuals with their children and parents. Therefore, they have expressed their hope that their parents can live their own retirement life.

When parents are already very tired, raising children does not necessarily prevent old age, and the acquired parenting problem must be both physical and mental pain. The post-90s generation believes that raising children is what they should do, and there is no need to let their parents experience the hardships again.

I hope you can be satisfied with me, and I wish you a happy life! Happy and healthy! 

Recently, the news that an old man asked the other party to pay compensation after helping his children and children has attracted a lot of attention and related discussions. ......Whether children are obliged to pay grandchild fees for the elderly who help them take care of their children needs to be analyzed from many aspects. Specifically, there is no legal obligation to bring grandchildren, the elderly do not have the obligation to bring grandchildren, and from the perspective of remuneration for labor, children should pay grandchildren to the elderly.

1. From a legal point of view, there is no obligation for children to pay for the elderly and grandchildren.

The relevant laws stipulate that parents have the obligation to support their children, and children have the obligation to support their parents. This is a very clear thing. ......However, the relevant law does not stipulate that children are obliged to pay grandchildren to elderly people who help them take care of their children.

Therefore, from the perspective of rights and obligations, children do not have to pay grandchild fees.

2. The relevant laws do not stipulate that the elderly have the obligation to help their children take care of their grandchildren.

Although the children of Lun Weitan are not obliged to pay grandchildren to the elderly who help them take care of their children, according to the relevant laws, the elderly are also not obliged to help their children take care of their children. ......Specifically, the elderly can completely ignore their children and grandchildren. Children also have no right to ask the elderly to bring their own children.

3. From the perspective of getting paid for their labor, children should pay the elderly.

Although according to the relevant laws, the elderly have no obligation to help their children take care of their grandchildren, and the children are not obliged to pay the fees for the elderly to bring their grandchildren, but from the actual situation, the corresponding compensation still needs to be given. ......The reason why I say this is because the old man helped his children to take care of his grandson, Latong, after all, he paid for his labor, so he should be paid. If the children of the elderly do not pay this part of the remuneration, it is unreasonable and does not comply with relevant laws and regulations.

From this point of view, children need to pay for the elderly to bring grandchildren.

Legally, there is no obligation for children to pay grandchildren's fees. However, in terms of social and family ethics, children have the responsibility to care for and assist their elderly parents, including grandchildren. There is no one standard answer to this question, but it depends on the family situation and the wishes of the person concerned.

If the children have the financial means, they may be willing to help their parents with their grandchildren, as this will not only reduce the burden on the parents, but also increase the emotional bond between family members. However, if the children do not have the financial means or have their own family and job, they may not easily take on the responsibility of bringing grandchildren. Brother argues.

In the family, the best way is to have effective communication and understanding among family members, and find the best solution through negotiation. If necessary, family members can seek professional advice, such as those of a lawyer or a family conflict specialist.

In short, whether or not to pay for grandchildren needs to take into account factors such as family and financial situation. Although there is no clear legal responsibility, children should do their best to care for and help their elderly parents and try to find the best solution when it comes to interpersonal relationships and social morality.

In traditional Chinese culture, filial piety has always been regarded as an important part of Confucian ethics, especially the obligation of children to support their parents, and this concept has been deeply rooted in people's thinking. With the changes in society and the process of modernization, the issue of pension has increasingly become the focus of people's attention. One of the hot topics is whether the elderly have the right to pay for their grandchildren, and whether their children are obliged to pay for their grandchildren.

So, from a legal point of view, is the child obligated to pay the grandchild fee?

According to the provisions of China's Civil Code, family members should respect and help each other, and there is no clear provision that there is no such thing as a grandchild. However, we cannot understand this question only at the textual level, after all, there are certain moral principles in the raising of children.

For children, bringing grandchildren is not only a kind of care for children, but also a kind of care for the father or mother. At this time, the state of righteousness is the moment when children should embody family ethics and affection. However, whether the child is obligated to pay the grandchild fee also needs to be considered in the specific circumstances of the stool.

In our country, there is currently no clear law that stipulates that children must pay grandchildren, but children must pay grandchildren if the following conditions are met:

1.The parties have reached a written agreement that clearly stipulates that the child is responsible for paying the grandchild fee, and the content of the agreement is legal and valid.

2.Article 125 of the Property Law stipulates that "if a parent who has no place to live or one of the parents needs to occupy or use another person's house if he or she shares a house with other family members, the consent of the owner of the house shall be obtained; During the period of occupation or use, the usage fee shall be paid in accordance with reasonable standards. In this case, the child is obliged to pay the grandchild fee.

If the above criteria are not met, the child can still voluntarily pay the childcare fee, but this is not a statutory obligation. It should be reminded that if parents ask their children to pay for grandchildren, they should follow the method of mutual consultation, consultation and communication to solve the problem in a harmonious manner.

In short, under the influence of traditional culture, the concept of filial piety has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. However, whether a child is obliged to pay for grandchildren depends on the specific circumstances and cannot be summarized simply as an obligation. In any case, the relationship between children and parents should be based on mutual respect, trust and responsibility.

In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the number of young people "economically gnawing at the elderly" and "housework at the elderly", and it is understandable for the elderly to help their children do housework and take care of their children within their ability out of consideration of family affection, but this is by no means their obligation.

So, are the elderly obligated to raise their grandchildren? Whether the elderly have the right to claim "grandchild fees".

Some people think that it is a "convention" for grandparents or maternal grandparents to raise their grandchildren, not to mention that family members also have the obligation to help each other, so it is appropriate for the elderly to bring their grandchildren at their own expense.

Another view is that grandparents or maternal grandfathers do not have a legal obligation to support their own grandchildren, and grandparents take care of children for their children, and the nature of such behavior is no different from hiring a nanny, and a labor contract relationship is formed between them and their children, and the children should pay the corresponding labor fees.

The third view is that parents have the obligation to raise and educate their children, and since grandparents or maternal grandparents raise their grandchildren on behalf of their children in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Law, they should pay the corresponding expenses to the elderly.

According to the laws of our country, parents are the legal guardians of their children and have the obligation to raise and educate their children. Therefore, in judicial practice, we have the right to require the beneficiary to reimburse the necessary expenses paid by the beneficiaries in accordance with the provisions of the General Provisions of the Civil Law on management without cause, that is, if there is no legal or agreed obligation to manage or provide services in order to avoid the loss of the interests of others.

However, at the same time, we should make it clear that since there is no written or oral labor contract between the elderly and their children, and there is no contractual relationship between the two parties, the "grandchild fee" claimed by the elderly refers to the expenses actually spent by the elderly on behalf of his children, and is not the labor fee obtained by the elderly through litigation.

After analysis, do you understand? Finally, in today's society governed by the rule of law, we must not let habits overshadow the law, and every family member should find out their own position and clarify their obligations and responsibilities.