Two horses collide during a scenic horse season show, should we reject the form of animal performanc

Two horses collide during a scenic horse season show, should we reject the form of animal performance? Everyone should strictly reject the form of animal performances. Animal performances are fundamentally meaningless, and no matter how good animal performances are, they are just a pastime for human beings. <>

According to the information, during the equestrian performance in a scenic spot in Chengde, the two horses collided head-on and could not stand on the ground for a long time, and were finally carried off the field by the staff. The staff said that the scenic spot is currently open for business, and the equestrian show is performing normally. This incident is enough to attract everyone's attention.

Animal performances should have been regulated by the state for a long time, and animals should live freely in the wild, and even in zoos, keepers try to keep them according to their own habits. However, in order to make profits, circuses and other institutions to use animals for performances, such as monkey riding, tigers drilling fire rings, elephant paintings, elephant dancing, and other incredible performances are actually practiced by humans who have repeatedly destroyed animals. For example, elephants are forced to memorize over and over again with elephant hooks, iron cables and other props, and in the end, the elephant with a strong memory learns all kinds of skills that it should not know.

Forcing animals to perform is not only an oppression of their nature, but also a physical and psychological destruction of them. Animals that are supposed to hunt and survive in the wild are forced to learn deformed skills that will make it extremely difficult for them to survive when they return to the wild. The original intention of the zoo is to let more people understand the living habits of animals and protect some endangered animals, and these forced animals to perform are not only harmful to animals, but also affect many people's inherent perception of animals.

Such unnatural performances should be unanimously resisted. <>

For people in the city nowadays, there are few opportunities to contact animals, and only these forms can show the charm of animals, and should not be exaggerated because of accidental accidents.

I think that from the aspect of caring for small animals, we should reject the form of animal performance, because animals are also a separate individual, because human entertainment forces them to perform something.

I think it's not the form of animal performances that should be rejected, but the process of training animals, and there are a lot of circuses that abuse animals, and that's the root cause of the matter.

I definitely don't support animal performances, the first reason is that doing so will hurt the minds of these wild animals, many animals are because they have been abused by animal trainers for a long time, and the pressure is too great to lose their minds, either attacking humans or ending up depressedThere is another reason, animal performances are actually for people's entertainment, and do not play any role in educating and popularizing science, for example, children, they go to the zoo, they should be aware of the habits of animalsInstead of letting them perform against human nature, after all, many performances are for animals to do things they don't want to do, such as monkeys learning to ride bicycles, which are against the common sense of nature.

As an individual, I'm actually against animal performancesAfter all, animal performances will hurt the minds of animals and limit the freedom of animals, which is contrary to the practice of protecting and reproducing animals and popular science educationAnimal performances are often dominated by wild animals, not cats, dogs, cattle and sheep, such as lions, tigers and brown bears, which themselves do not listen to peopleThey are all wild and difficult to tame, so it is not the right thing for humans to force them to do things that go against their natureEven if you give lions and tigers delicious food to them in the zoo, they will not be able to return to the wild in the future, and it will not achieve the meaning of protecting animals.

One last point,It's that we want to show children how animals behave in natureLet the child understand the habits and natural behavior of animals, rather than the way animals show humans on the circusThis is just a distorted appearance, for example, monkeys in nature can only climb trees, and they can't ride bicycles at allLetting them imitate human beings is meaningless for popular science education.

No, animals are natural by nature, and letting them run freely is the scene that the audience in the park likes to see the most, rather than artificially training and showing.

I don't support it, to be honest, I think the animal show itself is an anti-protection thing, obviously people live well, but because we want to see different entertainment, cruelly overdraft the animals.

Of course, animal performance is also an industrial chain, which can provide a lot of jobs and promote the development of tourism, as for what animal rights, it is all the West's stupid set of white-left ideas, in order to protect animals and make people lose their jobs, who is cruel?

That's why I'm a big fan of animal shows, and I'll take my kids to the circus on holidays in the future.

Support animal performances, and perform animals just like actors, but you should take care of the animals performing and see them as your companions.