Is it wrong to teach the job to the successor without reservation

In fact, it is also your very important duty and responsibility to let the successor fully understand your work and let him take over smoothly.

As for the latter question you're considering, be afraid"The back waves of the Yangtze River push the front waves, and the front waves die on the beach"In fact, it is also human nature.

In fact, there is a way to achieve a win-win situation or even a win-win situation.

The key is to make what you do not only clear and understandable to your successor, but more importantly, let your boss and even the boss know everything you do, and let your superiors know your meticulous patience and unreserved knowledge. In this way, they will feel that they choose to transfer you, which is a very good choice, which can not only put you in a more suitable position, but also ensure a smooth transition of the vacant position.

Moreover, the ability to train is an important indicator of a person's promotion. Through this incident, the boss will be very relieved about your future information transmission and delivery.

Also, the colleague who got your help will basically thank you very much.

In that case, why not.

Just don't write it down to him on paper, send it to him by mail and copy it to your superiors at the same time. This not only achieves the purpose of transmission, but also lets the superiors know what you have done. And not too many traces.

If you do this every time, you won't be transferred, but promoted more often.

Some people say that how big the heart is, how big the development is, those who say you are not worthy, they only deserve to stand in place and guard the one acre and three points of the field.

Good luck in your career.

You are really serious and responsible for your work, now there are not many such people, in the workplace for a long time, everyone has learned to keep a hand or let others, just like a cat with a tiger when the apprentice is not the same as the tiger to climb the tree, to be a man is to harm people can not have, the heart of defense is indispensable, and, I think, you only need to write an entry outline of your work, the specific problem to do, is to take over the person's own method problem, you do not do not hand in hand, And others may not think that your method is the best, everyone has their own style, see how he grasps it, what does the landlord think?

I would like to say. You are a good Samaritan person.

People who say you're stupid, they're not, they're secularized.

Secularization is very easy to mix well in society, sleek, and power can make you climb up, but your behavior like this can make you win the respect and love of more people, and it is easy for people to see the side of hypocrisy and power in a worldly person, and a well-meaning person will always let people discover their sincerity and enthusiasm.

Support you.

Teaching people cannot be taught completely. If you ask something, you have to keep a hand. It's the society we have now. Don't know what's going to happen tomorrow. Just like me. I was stabbed in the back by someone else.

Hehe. It depends on whether you are speaking from the reality or from your own cultivation and morality, and I personally prefer the latter.

That's right. Be a man but ask for a clear conscience.

Support you.

Ethically yes. For example, if you let others know that you have reservations about teaching new people, will you feel honored, or will you feel ashamed?

From a social point of view, yes. If a craft is not well inherited, how can we talk about development and progress?

Your question is a bit too absolute, and I think you have to approach your question from two aspects. One is to see if people are interested in your things, if you are not interested, you want to teach, and people don't want to learn! The second is to see if it can be taught.

If a thief wants to learn your lock-picking skills to steal something, will you teach it? Personally, as long as it is good for society and not bad for me and my family, I will teach it! If it's bad for society, it's good for me, and I won't teach!

If it is good for the society and bad for me or my family, I will analyze it from a developmental perspective and finally decide whether to teach or not!

The teacher imparted his knowledge to us without reservation.

The teacher imparted his knowledge to us without reservation.

Without reservation with all the same meaning, repeated.

Unreservedly with all the same meaning, repetition makes the sentence contradictory.

Support Repetition makes sentences contradictory.

Skinned Modification: The teacher teaches all his knowledge to the students without reservation. (not a word for all).

The teacher teaches his knowledge to the students without reservation! (Add one word and two punctuation, full stop to sigh, double emphasis).

Teachers dedicate their efforts to the cause of education without reservation.

In the same situation, I will talk about my feelings.

If the student is more arrogant and capable, this kind of person will find a way to catch up during the internship period, otherwise it will have an impact on your development in the future. If you have the potential for development, then teach it well, after all, it is a merit. My point is that knowledge cannot fall into the hands of people of bad quality.

In fact, then again, everyone's first job will not last too long, because there were a lot of fools who were ignorant and made a lot of fools, and people will only remember his shortcomings, not his favors. The old employees will call them as always, and they will not stop because they have turned positive. If you work as an intern for a year or two, people will leave on their own.

As long as you don't fight each other on the battlefield in the future, it's fine.

Why teach, as the saying goes, it makes sense to teach the apprentice to starve to death the master. I have experienced it firsthand, I took an intern, a master's degree, I only graduated with a bachelor's degree, but I have 20 years of work experience. When I came, the boss and the apprentice swore that I was the head of the technical department at that time, but then the apprentice brought it out, and I also stood aside and was transferred to the logistics department to manage things.

The current person in charge of the technical department is the intern I took with me. Please think about it again.

In principle, it should be taught without reservation, but in practice there will always be reservations, especially personal experience.

When I graduated, the master who took me was very good to me, basically I asked anything, he told me in detail, although I changed jobs, but I still have a good relationship with the master, and the contact continues. They should be taught well, and like you said, they are not easy.

Friend, first of all, congratulations on being able to bring an intern, because this is the trust that the company has in you. As for the disciples of the church, they will starve the master to death, and that concept is old. Your apprentice is better than you, are you afraid that you won't be mixed up in the future?

But then again, I think you have to teach according to your aptitude, and there are interns who you teach them all and they can't learn. But you must remember that it is good to be responsible for the company.

If you do your duty during working hours, you will be worthy of your salary and character.

They should be taught well, so as not to affect their work, and besides, if they are really capable, they will definitely surpass you, and if they are not capable, they will never surpass you. It will be the same for other people to come over in the future.

In short, if you feel that you can get along, you can teach them, and if you don't feel good, you will be so-so.

Of course, as an intern, I still hope that you will have more experience, after all, you can be regarded as a master.

There are always ups and downs in life, don't take it too seriously.

Once was, and only once.

What's more, you're not what he used to be!

Taking yourself too seriously will only hurt you.

You think too much, but he doesn't confess, and after observing for a while, he is a man, without decision and courage, and loves him very much.

He still has feelings for you, but he should replace his liking for you with love, the kind of love from his family, and when he confides in you, he wants you to comfort him, so as to relax his pressure.

It's hard to say that I should treat you as a friend.

Teasing you, making you happy, if you can get a spare tire by the way.

If you have a girlfriend and say that you like you, that's irresponsible

I can trust you in my heart when you are a friend.

He says he likes you, but he just likes you. Instead of loving you more.

Lao Tzu's knowledge was imparted to Confucius by himself without reservation.

Lao Tzu's own knowledge was unreservedly taught to Confucius.

See how important that person is to you.

Isn't it to the point where you give it all?

It depends on whether you're worth it.

The formal handover of the work should not be wrong, and I personally feel that whether my work experience is taught to others depends entirely on how I feel, and I can teach or not, which does not belong to the handover category.

Actually, it doesn't matter if you teach or not, because that person has to learn again, and if you teach him, it means that you are responsible, and if you don't teach him, you don't lose your duty, because you are handing over work, not experience.

It does not fall under the category of handover. Look at personal relationships and preferences, leaving a good reputation is beneficial to the development of the industry in the future, personal advice.

Just hand over the job at hand, tell him what to do in this position, and the other company will train him.

Handover is not teaching. Just tell him what you are currently doing and what you have to do it. Work experience you can teach if you want, don't teach if you don't want to, and learn to fool when you don't teach, otherwise it will be too embarrassing.

If you want to, teach it, of course, if you don't want to, forget it, the individual is personal, and the process that the company should teach still has to be taught.