Seek an explanation of this passage 10

The first: I laughed at his miscalculations and always tried to change the pieces for himSecond: when the game was about to reach the middle game, I thought harder, and the guest was more relaxed.

Qian Daxin watched the game at a friend's office. A customer loses, scorns its miscalculation, and wants to ignore it, thinking that it is not enough to catch himself. In an instant, the guest invited to play the game with Yu, and it was quite easy.

After a few shots, the guest has to take the lead. The bureau will be half, and it will be hard to think about it, and the wisdom of the guest is still more than enough. In the number of games, the guest won to the thirteen sons.

Yu Hao Shi, can't say a word. Later, there was a beckon to the spectators, who just sat silently all day long. Today's scholars read the books of the ancients, and they are more aware of the mistakes of the ancients; Living with today's people is also happy to call people lost.

People can't be without mistakes, but try to get around, and live with peace of mind, and I can't make any mistakes? I can know people's losses but can't see my losses, I can refer to people's small losses but can't see my big losses, I ask for my losses and I can't be timeless, how can I talk about people! The advantages and disadvantages of the game are determined, and everyone can see the loss of the game, although the former cannot be concealed.

Where the reason is, each is what it is, each is not what it is, there is no Confucius in the world, who can determine the truth of right and wrong? However, the loss of people may not necessarily be gained, and the loss of my loss may not be a big loss, and they sneer at each other, and when there is no time, those who have watched the game are not as good as it. Translations or Notes:

I was watching a game of chess at a friend's house. One of the guests repeatedly lost, and I laughed at him for his miscalculations and always tried to replace the pieces for him, thinking that he couldn't catch up with him. After a while, the guest asked to play chess with me, and I despised him.

Just after playing a few chess pieces, the guest has taken the initiative in the situation. As the game approached the middle of the game, I was thinking harder, while the client was more relaxed. The final game counts both pieces, and the guest wins me thirteen pieces.

I was so ashamed that I couldn't say a word. Later, someone invited me to play chess, and I just sat silently all day and watched. Nowadays, when those who study the books of the ancients, they often criticize the mistakes of the ancients. When I get along with people now, I also like to talk about other people's mistakes.

It's impossible for people to be without mistakes, but try to swap places with each other to get along, and calmly estimate that you really don't have any mistakes? I can recognize the mistakes of others but can't see my own mistakes, I can point out the small mistakes of others but can't see my big mistakes, I don't have time to check my own mistakes, I have time to talk about others! There is a standard for the level of chess skills, and people can see a mistake, even if they want to defend their previous mistakes, they can't hide it.

On the issue of reason, everyone agrees with what they think is right and everyone opposes what they think is incorrect. Then other people's mistakes may not be gained, and their own mistakes are not necessarily not big mistakes, but when people laugh at each other and do not stop, they are not even as good as those who watch chess.

Which article is this?