How to comprehensively grasp the problem of rural governance?

Rural governance is to promote the development of local economy and society and the improvement of environmental conditions through the rational allocation and production of resources such as village and town layout, ecological environment, infrastructure, and public services. It is necessary to continuously improve the material living standards and spiritual civilization of the vast number of rural residents, change the status quo of "dirty, disorderly, and poor" rural areas, and continuously strengthen grassroots governance. Rural governance should follow the following basic principles and construction ideas:

Adhere to the people-oriented principle and improve people's livelihood. Always put the interests of the peasant masses in the first place, give full play to the main role of the peasant masses, respect the peasant masses' right to know, participate, make decisions and supervise, and guide them to vigorously develop the ecological economy, consciously protect the ecological environment, and accelerate the construction of an ecological homeland.

Adhere to the integration of urban and rural areas and coordinate development. Establish a long-term mechanism to promote agriculture through industry and lead rural areas with cities, promote the construction of new urbanization and beautiful villages and towns as a whole, deepen the reform of the household registration system, accelerate the pace of urbanization of farmers, accelerate the extension of urban infrastructure and public services to rural areas, and strive to build a new pattern of integration of urban and rural economic and social development.

The main content of the pilot.

The focus of the pilot work is to strengthen the basic work of the rural grassroots and improve the rural governance system that combines autonomy, rule of law and rule of ethics under the leadership of the party organization.

Explore a governance system of co-construction, co-governance and sharing. In accordance with the requirements of improving the modern rural social governance system of party committee leadership, responsibility, social coordination, public participation, rule of law guarantees, and scientific and technological support, explore effective ways to strengthen the construction of rural governance systems and achieve multi-party participation. Implement the leadership responsibilities of county and township party committees, clarify the responsibilities of party committees and departments, improve the working mechanism for farmers and social forces to participate in rural governance, and form a rural governance pattern of co-construction, co-governance and sharing.

Explore the mechanism of coordinated development of rural governance and economy and society. In accordance with the general requirements of the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, the improvement of rural governance mechanisms and the development of rural industries, the improvement of rural human settlements, the promotion of village infrastructure construction, the protection of the ecological environment, the shaping of civilized rural customs, and the alleviation of poverty will be organically combined. Explore effective ways to straighten out the relationship between rural property rights and governance, promote the development of a new type of collective economy in rural areas, diversify the resolution of rural contradictions and disputes, and stimulate the vitality of rural development.

Rural governance is entirely up to the members of the village committee, whether they can lead the whole village on their behalf, take responsibility for new tricks, and their ability.

Keep it simple. The governance plan is obtained through the management cost management and timeliness accounting of the village committee. For example, if there are 10 teams in a village, which are directly managed by the village committee, is it managed by sub-project or sub-group docking? For example, in terms of hygiene.

There is a fundamental difference between rural governance and urban governance, but the urban governance model is not suitable for rural areas at all, and it is a very complex project for rural governance to be carried out from the root, ecology, health, environment, culture, education, public services, etc., all need real money to solve the problem, and it is not a sentence to solve the problem on the governance in place.

To deal with the problems of agriculture and villages, we must first publicize the law to the peasants and deal with them according to law.

With the economic and social development, the traditional countryside has moved from the closed and single in the past to the open and diversified, and the enhancement of mobility has also caused a certain degree of hollowing and heterogeneity within the countryside. In the face of deep changes in rural areas, the traditional rural governance model has a single governance subject.

First, the lack of effective supervision, the lack of governance tools, and the imbalance in the interaction between government and society are obviously unable to cope with the new challenges under the new situation. The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed to "improve the rural governance system combining autonomy, rule of law, and rule by virtue", which pointed out the direction and path for good governance in rural areas. "Internet + rural governance" can effectively solve the problem of the absence of floating villagers under the "integration of three governance", and is an important platform and channel to promote the benign interaction of governance, social regulation, and grassroots mass autonomy.

First of all, it is necessary to go deep into the rural areas, get in touch with rural things, understand the rural people, and understand the problems in the rural areas.

Secondly, you can compare other villages to see the problems and advantages of this village.

Then according to the advantages and disadvantages of the plan, targeted improvement is insufficient, here can learn from the excellent governance experience of other rural areas, for their own advantages to give full play, the formation of industry, drive the economy, drive regional development.

The work of the governance center is the evolution of littering, the rectification of indiscriminate construction, the layout is planned in advance, and then carried out according to the plan.

Plan your layout ahead of time and follow the plan.

Governance Center Work Littering Purification. Remediation of indiscriminate construction. Care for the vulnerable.

First of all, the members of the party group are unable to play a leading role, and in practice, many people are arbitrary and arbitrary, and cannot guide the masses well and let the villagers participate in rural governance, and the exemplary guidance is not in place.

The second is that many village cadres are relatively old, and they are not innovative enough in daily management and handling problems, and they are prone to rely on experience to solve relevant problems, which is not advisable. In addition, there is a shortage of village cadres who have a relatively short idea of the rule of law, and now the social structure of the villages has undergone great changes, and they cannot effectively use the knowledge of the law, but prefer to take some extreme measures.

Finally, the village cadres are not enough to control the economic ability and avoid risks, the village economy is mainly led by the village cadres, and the rural areas lack the village cadres who really understand the professional knowledge of economic organization and management and modern enterprise operation, and even some village cadres are still thinking in the era of planned economy.

At this stage, there is a large gap in the economic and social development of rural areas in China, and the difficult problems faced by different regions are not the same, but in general, there are the following five difficult problems in rural governance in China.

One is that the population of the village is "empty". With the continuous development of urbanization and economic society, China's population distribution has shown a trend of further agglomeration to economically developed regions and towns. With the migration of rural people to the cities in large numbers, the rural structure has undergone major changes, and the new "part-time work and half-farming" model represented by the "intergenerational division of labor" and "gender division of labor" has quickly become the main livelihood structure in rural areas (i.e., the livelihood model in which the young and strong labor force of rural households, mainly men, goes out to obtain income, while women, the elderly and children in the family work at home to obtain agricultural income).

Different from the previous model of leaving the land without leaving the hometown, under the new "part-time work and half-farming", the young and strong labor force has left the land and left the hometown, which has brought about the problem of rural hollowing. Second, the rural society is "scattered". Since the reform and opening up, the simplification of the functions of village-level organizations and the adjustment of production relations have reduced the interaction between peasant households and village-level organizations and between peasant households.

On the one hand, the comprehensive implementation of the household responsibility system and the continuous progress of agricultural science and technology have made the highly decentralized business model with individual households as the main body become the mainstream of agricultural production, and then gradually opened up the originally intimate production and life relationship in rural areas. On the other hand, due to the impact of the market economy, the weakening of the functions of grass-roots organizations, the reduction of social and cultural life in the villages, the acceleration of the flow of people, and the miniaturization of rural families, the villages in some places lack cohesion and centripetal force, and the leadership, leadership, and appeal of village-level organizations are insufficient, and they fall into the embarrassing situation of "no one listens to what they say and no one follows them". The above factors are superimposed on the "hollowing" of rural areas and the weak village collective economy, so that some villages have obvious characteristics of "scattered ideas, scattered resources, and scattered funds", and individual peasant households have no ability or idea to organize and manage the huge and disorderly resources within the village, and the good wish of "turning lucid waters and lush mountains into gold and silver mountains" often corresponds to the cruel reality of "good mountains, good waters, and good desolation".

Third, the work burden is "heavy". Since the beginning of the new century, the state's major policies have been adjusted to industry to feed agriculture and cities to support rural areas, and the state's investment in agriculture and rural areas has continued to increase. While the factor resources continue to sink into the countryside, the corresponding work tasks, standard requirements, supervision and inspection are also accompanied by the sinking of the countryside, making the operation mode of the village "two committees" more and more like a first-level administration, and the degree of "professionalism" of village cadres is increasing day by day.

In the face of a large number of tasks assigned by townships and towns, village cadres have in fact become the "best people" in the townships, and they rarely have time to "discuss the situation of the village" with the local people and carry out villager self-government. In particular, under the circumstance that the mountains and rivers are overwhelmed with assessments and inspections, the pressure on the village-level organizations is huge, the operation is disorderly, and they are tired of coping, and the village cadres have become "cousins" and "cousins", and their energy is focused on holding meeting reports to check in and meet the inspection, squeezing the time for providing high-quality services for the peasant masses and grasping rural governance.

1.Problems and dilemmas in rural governance: lack of governance talents, low literacy, lack of financial guarantee for rural grassroots social governance, and low enthusiasm of some people to participate in grassroots governance.

2.Rural governance countermeasures: strengthen the cultivation of grassroots talents, transform talent training into the main force of governance, increase capital investment, provide financial guarantee for grassroots governance, and fully mobilize the participation of social organizations and the masses.

Summary: Rural governance includes improving the institutional mechanism of village party organizations leading rural governance, strengthening the construction of safe villages, promoting the construction of rural areas under the rule of law, and supporting the participation of multiple subjects in rural governance.

Rural governance still faces many problems. First, rural autonomy is still imperfect, grassroots democracy is a mere formality, peasants lack the dominant position, and peasants have few opportunities and great difficulties in participating in the management and supervision of village affairs. Second, the power and legitimacy of grassroots political power and organizations, as well as the financial power and foundation of grassroots political power and organizations, have not been fundamentally solved, resulting in poor rural financial conditions, resulting in the reduction of the public welfare of rural governance, the enhancement of operation, predation, and coercion, the transformation of rural governance into rural management, the transformation of rural public services into the possession of rural resources, and the deterioration of rural order.

Third, the main way for the state to transfer resources is the direct distribution of subsidies and the "project system", and the top-down resource input is often out of touch with the bottom-up needs of farmers. Fourth, there is a problem of corruption among village cadres, and it is difficult for village cadres and villagers to form a cooperative relationship in rural governance, but more of a game of interests, and the conflict between cadres and the masses is on the rise. In the face of the new contradictions in rural society and the new challenges of rural governance, it is necessary to further deepen the reform of the rural governance system and mechanism, improve the rural governance system and promote the realization of good rural governance.

The main problems of rural governance are: first, the low level of autonomy, second, the traditional governance mode does not meet the development needs of the new era, third, the "hollowing" is serious, and the main body of governance is missing, etc., and the above three points are the main problems of rural governance.

To be honest, the main problem of rural self-separation is the lack of talent. Now talented and capable people are in the city and don't want to be in the countryside.

The development of the rural economy has been restricted, and the permanent population of rural areas has decreased.

Legal Analysis: Questions:

1. Weak organizational capacity.

2. The improvement of the human settlement environment is insufficient.

3. Feudal superstition and historical dregs are overflowing, constantly eroding the foundation of rural civilization construction.

4. Lack of the concept of the rule of law.

5. The awareness of mass participation in governance is not there.

Countermeasures: 1. It is necessary to give full play to the leading core role of the party organization.

2. It is necessary to improve the living environment in rural areas.

3. It is necessary to deepen the construction of rural civilization.

4. Pay attention to the participation of the masses in rural social governance.

Legal basis: Law of the People's Republic of China on the Promotion of Rural Revitalization

Article 2: This Law applies to the full implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, the development of activities such as promoting the revitalization of rural industries, talents, culture, ecology, and organizations, and promoting the integrated development of urban and rural areas.

"Villages" as used in this Law refers to regional complexes outside urban built-up areas that have natural, social, and economic characteristics and multiple functions such as production, life, ecology, and culture, including townships, towns, villages, and so forth.

Article 3: The promotion of rural revitalization shall, in accordance with the general requirements of thriving industries, livable ecology, civilized rural customs, effective governance, and affluent life, make overall plans to promote rural economic, political, cultural, social, and ecological civilization construction, and Party building, and give full play to the unique functions of villages in ensuring the supply of agricultural products and food security, protecting the ecological environment, and inheriting and developing the excellent traditional culture of the Chinese nation.

Article 5: The State consolidates and improves the two-tier management system based on household contract management and combining centralized and decentralized management, and develops and strengthens the rural collective ownership economy.

Article 6: The State establishes and completes institutional mechanisms and policy systems for the integrated development of urban and rural areas, promotes the orderly flow of urban and rural elements, equal exchange, and balanced allocation of public resources, persists in supplementing agriculture with industry and using cities to lead rural areas, and promotes the formation of a new type of urban-rural relationship between industry and agriculture, in which industry and agriculture promote each other, urban and rural areas complement each other, develop in a coordinated manner, and prosper together.

Legal analysis: 1. Improve the institutional mechanism for village party organizations to lead rural governance.

2. Give full play to the vanguard and exemplary role of party members in rural governance.

3. Standardize the work affairs of village-level organizations.

4. Enhance the ability of villagers' self-governing organizations.

5. Enrich the forms of villagers' deliberations and consultations.

6. Fully implement the sunshine project for village-level affairs.

7. Actively cultivate and practice the core values of socialism.

8. Implement the cultivation of rural customs and civilization.

9. Give play to the leading role of moral models.

10. Strengthen the guidance of rural culture.

11. Promote the establishment of rule of law villages.

12. Strengthen the construction of safe villages.

13. Improve mechanisms for mediating and resolving conflicts and disputes in rural areas.

14. Increase the extent of punishment for corruption in small and micro powers at the grassroots level.

15. Strengthen the supply of legal services in rural areas.

16. Support multi-party participation in rural governance.

17. Enhance the ability of towns and villages to serve farmers.

Legal basis: "Guiding Opinions on Strengthening and Improving Rural Governance".

1) Improve the institutional mechanisms for village party organizations to lead rural governance.

2) Give play to the vanguard and exemplary role of Party members in rural governance.

3) Standardize the work affairs of village-level organizations.

4) Enhance the capacity of villagers' self-governing organizations.

5) Enrich the forms of villagers' deliberations and consultations.

6) Fully implement the Sunshine Project for Village-level Affairs.

7) Actively cultivate and practice the Core Socialist Values.

8) Implement the action of cultivating rural customs and civilization.

9) Give play to the leading role of moral models.

10) Strengthen the guidance of rural culture.

11) Advance the establishment of rule of law villages.

12) Strengthen the construction of safe villages.

13) Complete mechanisms for mediating and resolving rural conflicts and disputes.

14) Increase the extent of punishment for corruption in small and micro powers at the grassroots level.

15) Strengthen the supply of legal services in rural areas.

16) Support multi-party participation in rural governance.

17) Enhance the capacity of towns and villages to serve farmers.