Is that goal nullified for Italy, is it really okay?

Both balls are in the ambiguous range and can be judged however you want. The key depends on the mood of the referees.

Anyway, the result of the game will not be changed.

The goal is difficult to judge from the angle of the camera, and it is also very clear that the ball hit the right leg of the defender of the defender, and the left leg of the defender was only less than a step away from the outside of the goal line, but as far as the posture of the defender is concerned, I think the ball should have crossed the goal line and hit the joint of the defender's right leg. Just a personal opinion! (I'm also a fan of Italy).

In soccer, a goal is scored when the ball crosses the goal line in its entirety between the goal posts and under the crossbar without a previous violation of the rules of the game.

Slow motion at the time showed that the ball as a whole did not completely cross the goal line, so the goal was invalid.

This referee must hate Italy. Anyway, it's up to him to have the final say.

The referee has decided, even if it is not right, there is no way!

In the ball game, the referee is the standard, the god. The verdict can only be overturned after the game, but it cannot change the outcome of the game.

Think of the World Cup in '02, where the referee charged hundreds of millions of dollars to help South Korea defeat Italy.

At all times, black power and black gold are the laws that disrupt fair competition. Therefore, the fight against black forces is a long-term and unsparing operation. If you slacken, you will be doomed.

Some of this is due to Italy's own reasons, such as the 2010 World Cup Lippi has almost no good cards in his hands, and the Italian players themselves have performed poorly, and the heat is too slow. Another example is that the performance in 02 was indeed not good, the group stage was so difficult, if it weren't for the last magic strokes of Montella and Piero and the early exit of Ecuador, which round would Italy get into the knockout round?

And some of what you said is just a way to lose, such as losing on penalties, losing in extra time, it can't be an excuse Overall, it's still a good player in Italy who is out of gear.

There is a vacuum in the generation born in 80-84, and it is too meager to squeeze the surplus value of veterans alone

I hope that Montolivo, Marchisio, Balotelli and Bonucci will grow up quickly and take over the guns of the veterans

Some countries just can't afford to lose and lose that face, so they will come out and make excuses. Maybe so.

Yes, the tactics of the French team were used.

I don't work hard, and I make excuses everywhere when I lose, and I hate it. I won't talk about anything else, just talk about the World Cup in South Africa. Gianluigi Buffon's injury didn't have a big impact on Italy's backline, and the opponents didn't have many absolute chances against New Zealand and Slovakia, and when they did, the opponents took advantage of them, and Marchetti didn't make many saves.

In the second half of Italy's game against Slovakia, Pirlo still played, and quickly revitalized the Italian team's attack, but Italy's sluggishness and mistakes in defense completely buried the team. That's what I think, the defense is chaotic and for no other reason.

Reasons always exist objectively, and not making excuses does not mean that reasons do not exist.