What do the history books of Japan, the United States, and South Korea say about China?

In my own opinion, the history books of Japan and the United States are still relatively objective in their evaluation of China, while South Korea is unfair.

Now I will talk about China in the history books of Japan, the United States and South Korea.

Japan: Japan has a relatively objective assessment of China's history, for example, it has great respect for China's ancient achievements.

As one of the four ancient civilizations, China's miracle belongs to China and deserves to be known to the world.

United States: The United States is more objective about China's history. There is no big conflict, if not brotherhood, between China and the United States.

The United States has shown great respect for the creations of ancient China, and at least has drawn a strong stroke of color for ancient China in this world.

South Korea: I don't have a very good opinion of China's history.

South Korea has a great misunderstanding of China's history, and wars were waged against Korea in various periods of ancient China.

But the result is the same, Korea was defeated, but the Korean history books do not accept this fact.

The accounts are all unanimous, and the stubborn resistance of South Korea finally won the victory.

For such an evaluation, I believe that there will be many people who are not ashamed, failure is not terrible, and what is terrible is not daring to accept failure.

<> on this issue, I would like to say that the history books of Japan, the United States, and South Korea have both friendly and bad evaluations of China. But we can't say this, and the things that are good for our China are to say that we like China.

Or that those things that say bad things about our China just hate China. From a certain point of view, those foreign history books will have good and bad stories about China. None of us can judge other countries' evaluations of our country from a certain point of view.

Let's take a list of a book I recently read. It is a Harvard History of China. This book was compiled by Harvard University in the United States based on some history of China, so to speak! It is a person from abroad who is writing the history of our China.

I think the book is relatively neutral, and it doesn't say anything bad or good about China. It's more like stating the facts and maintaining a neutral attitude. So we will find that in fact, people abroad have both good and bad comments about our China.

But whether it's a good or bad review, we have to change it for the better. And we have to keep the good ones and carry them forward.

To sum up, some foreign history books have a lot of comments on China, both good and bad. But no matter what it is, we should strive to do a good job of ourselves, correct some of our own problems, and then strive to carry forward some good things.

Japanese history textbooks: worship ancient China, despise modern China, for example: when talking about Confucius, talk about Confucianism that has had a great impact on Japan; Speaking of the best with our country, it has brought a lot of benefits to Japan; When it comes to sending envoys to the Tang Dynasty to study the various systems and cultures of the Tang Dynasty, he said that "the Japanese sent envoys to the Tang Dynasty", and he did not shy away from calling them the Tang Dynasty.

Korean History Textbooks: Extremely Overestimating Yourself, Partially Distorting For example, Japanese textbooks say that they learned advanced culture from the Tang Dynasty, while South Korea states that Korea and China jointly created an advanced East Asian culture, and by the way, the culture spread to Japan and made an important contribution to the formation of ancient Japanese culture.

When talking about movable type printing in the Song Dynasty, it is admitted that it was a Chinese invention. However, after the Song Dynasty, the lifeline of movable type printing was cut off, and Korea popularized it and created metal movable type for the first time in the world.

The biggest feature of the United States is that it is all narrated, and the ancient books are written as they are written, and subjective interpretation is rarely added. And the focus is on the impact of invention on today. For example, when talking about acupuncture, he said:

This ancient medical technique is increasingly recognized by the American people today; When talking about the Han Dynasty, he said: A strong ** regime is an eternal and unchanging part of Chinese life; When talking about the Tang and Song dynasties, he focused on printing, gunpowder, porcelain, etc., and mentioned by the way that China was the largest importer of toilets in the United States, focusing on allowing students to connect history with reality.

No, Tang fought with Tule and had business relations with Goryeo, and what people said was not wrong, Song Shi almost died at the hands of Goryeo, weak as a mouse. It was finally conquered by the foreign Mongols.

1. Japanese history textbooks: I look down on modern China and admire ancient China very much.

2. American history textbooks have a neutral viewpoint and pay great attention to China's inventions.

3. South Korea's history textbooks are arrogant and distort facts.

1. Japanese History Textbook: Reverence Ancient China and Despise Modern China 2. American History Textbook: Neutrality, Focus on China's Creation 3. Korean History Textbook:

Extremely overestimating myself, I really think that Korean students are the luckiest to learn history, because if South Korea writes history, it will not exceed five pieces of paper. came to pay tribute to the Central Plains, and was later convicted by the Japanese mausoleum, and now he has become the younger brother of the United States. In fact, three sheets of paper are enough.