Can the Chinese Navy win against the Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force?

A large-scale naval battle is impossible, so that both sides will lose, the key is to have an advantage in a local firefight, and return the other side with color, which can be more and less, or an extreme ** surprise attack (Chinese nuclear submarine). Thanks, FYI!

In the event of a skirmish, the PLA Navy will hardly be a match for Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Forces, because the technological level of the ships on both sides is a generation apart.

If you want to win, you have to fight hard, and use quantity to make up for the gap in quality;

But in case of a big fight, the damage on both sides is too great for anyone to bear.

This is not primarily a question of whether to fight or not to win, but whether the two countries go to war will lead to a nuclear war or even a world nuclear war, and it is not a question of who wins or loses, and I believe that no one will be the winner in a nuclear war, so fundamentally I believe that neither China nor Japan wants to escalate the regional dispute into a war.

If it is only a naval confrontation, China has the advantage in numbers, and Japan is more advanced. But China has nuclear submarines. To be honest, it will only be a local war, really fighting?

Will our Second Artillery sit back and watch the Navy being bullied! The Diaoyu Islands have never changed as China, and little Japan has remained unchanged as a slave to the country.

I also want to say that the war will be won, but the aircraft carrier has not come out for the time being, and if it comes out, it should be 70% if it fights the Japanese Self-Defense Forces (10% is to see how the Chinese Navy plays with the technology of aircraft carriers).

The premise of the above is that China and Japan go head-to-head.

In the 80s of the last century, Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force had a powerful maritime power in Asia. But judging by the current development of the Chinese Navy, it is entirely possible that the Chinese Navy will surpass Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force in the next few years.

At one time, Chinese experts assessed Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force, which has obvious modern features, and Japan is also supported by the U.S. military, which has developed its own naval power relying on U.S. military technology. The Japanese Navy has strong missile destroyers and missile frigates, and the anti-missile capability of the Maritime Self-Defense Force is among the highest in Asia. All of this laid the foundation for the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, which is one of the strongest maritime forces in Asia.

But now, as China grows stronger, so does its navy. Once China's dreams of growing its navy were suppressed by other countries, China now has its own technology. In 2019, the Chinese Navy already had the latest 10,000-ton destroyers.

With these as a base, in the future of the Chinese Navy, China will also have frigates of a higher rank. Relying on the power of these ships, the Chinese navy will be stronger at sea.

At the same time, according to the provisions of the law, Japan cannot have aircraft carriers, and even destroyers that they have tried their best to build cannot be compared with aircraft carriers. But China's aircraft carriers and their frigates and destroyers are powerful enough to defeat any enemy.

Therefore, in China's future development, it is entirely possible to surpass the Japanese Maritime Guard Force and become the strongest maritime force to defend against external enemies and protect the interests of the country.

The strongest off the coast of Japan? If you don't understand, get out, I've been looking at the world's military for 40 years, and when it comes to maritime power alone, China fights them. Not to mention the Air Force and the Army, now it is the integration of joint operations, not counting the nuclear **, to put it mildly, it is not a problem to fight the three of them.

When was the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force the strongest in the Asian seas? None of the top five in Asia are in the rankings. Isn't it better than the navy to look at tonnage, not **?

If the civilian ships are really fought, the Taiwan Navy will be able to destroy the Japanese Navy. The Japanese Navy has no active bombs, no medium-range **, no separate combat system, and is heavily dependent on the United States, leaving the United States, the Japanese Navy can only cruise and defend. The navies of China, South Korea, India, and Taiwan can easily destroy the Japanese navy.

There is no doubt that it will surpass Japan, and if China's navy still lags behind Japan in its development over the past century, it will repeat the mistakes of the First Sino-Japanese War.

That's inevitable.

When the Chinese nation has risen, the world has entered a new round of arms race. What everyone compares is the comprehensive national strength.

No matter from the current comprehensive scale of national strength and the future development trend. China has overtaken Japan and will continue to widen the gap.

The Chinese Navy surpassed Haizi in 2015. At present, both the total tonnage of the navy and the strength of surface ships far exceed those of the sea. If someone pulls the few *** aircraft carriers from the sea, when they are fully equipped with F35 and complete the aircraft carrier modification, they may 003004 all of them will be in service.

That's absolute, the size of the country is there, Japan's first country is not as heavy as China, and second, it is subject to the post-war order of World War II, so Japan is inevitably inferior to China.

It's possible to time out, but it takes time. Don't believe the rubbish ** chicken blood article. The United States is afraid of China.

China's naval strength is among the top three in the world, and no country should have any objections.

No, no, no, Tokyo Bay is still buried with the space battleships Yamato, Musashi, Shinano, and Gundam, and even Godzilla is asleep. As long as the emperor wants, Japan dominates the universe every minute, let alone the small earth?

Yes, Japan's limitation lies in the small size of its territory and sea area, and after the formation of China's aircraft carrier system, Japan's so-called maritime power has been increasingly surpassed by China.

Very likely.

As long as we work hard to develop and progress, there will always be a time to surpass each other.

It takes a hundred years? Now it is a situation in which each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and within ten years, it will be able to surpass steadily, and our biggest obstacle is the US military, and in the short term, the US military is the boss of the Asia-Pacific region!

Hello landlord: The Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force and the Navy are of the same nature, and even the overall quality ranks among the top three in the world. Because after World War II, Japan, as a defeated country in Class A, had no right to have an army, and could only be called:

For more information about the Self-Defense Forces (in fact, they are the same as the military) can be found in the Potsdam Proclamation.

I think it is rational for China to use fishing boats to maneuver with Japan, if China uses **, it will inevitably start a war, and the US military stationed in Japan will also intervene, and it will be China that will suffer at that time! But if Japan does it first, then Japan will be the unlucky. At a critical moment, we cannot afford to fall for the Americans.

Otherwise, the consequences will be unimaginable, and now the relationship between the United States and China has been in a cold war, so we can only deal with them in this way.

Hope the above can help the landlord solve the problem o( o

Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force is the Japanese Navy.

There are too many ignorant Chinese like you

The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force is not strictly a navy, but is similar to China's border armed police force, and although in reality it has a strong military force, it is not nominally a navy.

The other side is the second navy in the world, and our country will not send ** until we are absolutely sure.

It's not because there are many Americans, it's not because the United States is big, and there was no nuclear ** at that time, so it's not a very important issue.

The main reason is that the industrial strength of the United States is too strong, and the Japanese Navy basically scrapped Midway after the battle. It's not as simple as sinking 4 aircraft carriers as you think, what Japan lacked most at that time was not planes, not **, not even oil, but pilots. In the First Battle of Midway, the most elite of the HNA in the First Air War and the Second Air Battle, almost all of them were wiped out, and these pilots were trained in the Chinese battlefield and had more than 1,000 hours of flight training.

The Fifth Air War did not participate in the war, and there were no losses, but the level of the Fifth Air War was far worse than theirs. The speed at which Japan trained pilots could not keep up with the rate of its losses, and this was the main reason why Japan could not defeat the United States. As for why, it comes back to the question of industrial strength, the air force spends a lot of money and uses a lot of oil to train pilots, and Japan cannot afford it.

The training time of American pilots is only 500 hours, which is not as much as the first and second air battles, but how can Japan compare with the training of tens of thousands of pilots who have 500 hours of such a game. Or is it because of the gap in industrial strength, the Americans have radar, VT information tube such top technology, the Japanese only have cat's eye, electric detector, three-type bomb, not a thing of the times.

1.The guiding ideology is wrong.

During World War II, Japan still held on to the idea of a decisive battle with artillery, and failed to pay full attention to the tremendous military changes brought about by aircraft carriers.

Although the aircraft carrier was used to achieve the victory of the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, the idea of a decisive battle with artillery was still in his bones.

2.The overall national strength cannot be compared with that of the United States.

In the early stages of the war, Japan was still able to achieve partial victories.

As long as the US war machine is in full swing and enters a wartime state, Japan has no chance of winning at all.

3.For the method of use of submarines, Japan is even more backward.

During the war, Japanese submarines were often used to provide logistical support to the army defending the islands, and failed to take advantage of the advantages of the submarines themselves (concealment) to break up the engagement.

4.At the end of World War II, Japan was overstretched in terms of personnel training and equipment research and development.

Only then will a large number of young and middle-aged people devote themselves to special attack operations.

The real difference in strength, the Japanese Navy's Combined Fleet reached its peak before World War II, but it was 30 years of hard accumulation, and the Americans easily copied several Japanese Combined Fleets in 3 years as soon as they made a force.

This is mainly a matter of national strength, the initial strength of the US Navy is not very strong, but it has a strong national economic strength and industrial base; Japan's submarine forces also failed to achieve the same results as the Germans due to tactical errors in guidance; And then there was the fact that Japan's oil was basically imported at that time... A lot.

One of the reasons is that the industrial level of the United States is much higher, such as aircraft carriers, which the United States built very quickly, and it is difficult for Japan to replenish the sinking one, and the other is resources.

What's more important is people's hearts.

The technical level and the quality of the personnel are too far behind.

The Japanese hardly understand electronic warfare, and the secret telegrams of the commander's travel plan have been deciphered, and they don't understand anything at all, let alone radar, proximity fuses, etc., they don't understand it at all, or communication depends on roaring, reconnaissance depends on walking, and there are still numbers, hehe, during the war, Japan built a total of 9 aircraft carriers, and the United States built 28, and they haven't done their best, and they still have spare time to build cruise ships.

It's mainly a matter of national strength!

Japan only built 2 battleships (Yamato Musashi) in World War II with great national strength! The United States built more than 10 ships at once, which is more than all the other participating countries combined.

Japan's mass-produced fleet aircraft carrier Yunryu-class has built 3 completed ships! 24 American Essex-class aircraft carriers were built!

Japan is inferior to the United States in all types of warships, so the Japanese Navy has only failed!

It is China that contains the Japanese army, why would the United States support the Kuomintang, if we don't contain it, will they care if we live or die?

At that time, Japan's navy was far more powerful than the United States, it did not take the United States seriously at all, and their national character led to their own defeat and greed. If it had remained on Chinese soil at that time, I can say with certainty that no one would have come to save us, because Kemoto couldn't get in, it was Japan who fought it, so it was so.

Moreover, although Germany and Japan were allies, Japan was arrogant and greedy, and did not listen to Germany at all.

If the two countries switch places, Japan is likely to win.

In the Pacific Theater, why did the U.S. Navy beat Japan? Krypton gold damage management made the Japanese Navy doubt life.

At that time, China held back a large number of Japanese troops.

It's like a milk doll going to beat an adult man, what do you say?