I joined the work in 80 and was removed from the unit in 85 years, and the reason for the superbirth

Updated on society 2024-06-05
20 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    I'm afraid there is no way to do this, the reason why you were removed from the unit in 85 years was that you had a superbirth, and at that time family planning was a basic national policy, so now there is basically no way to overturn the previous results.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Different times have different policies, and the policy at that time was like this, superbirth is to accept punishment if you violate the policy, and it is useless to find a unit.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    You joined the work in 80 years, and in 85 years you were removed from the unit for violating the family planning policy, and now you want to ask the unit for an explanation, this is not okay, there are policies and regulations in various periods, and you were punished for violating it at that time, which is correct, and now the society has developed and the situation has changed, and the second child is released, but it does not mean that the punishment for overbirth can be corrected, these are two different things, and they cannot be confused.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    There is no way to get any argument back, because family planning was a national policy back then. It is the policy and strategy of the state. Units perform that is normal.

    If you feel like you can at work. Let's unit. Sit up and take notice.

    Yes. How to reapply. Enter the unit.

    But I advise you not to do it. Because yours. People who do not take the policies and strategies of the state seriously.

    Neither will the unit. I hope I want people like you. Because you're an undisciplined person.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Press the last century. Eight.

    10. In line with the regulations of the 90s, if an employee of an enterprise violates the family planning regulations and gives birth in excess of his or her child, the employer has the right to directly dismiss the employee without any economic compensation. Because this was the basic national policy at that time, everyone was obliged to strictly implement it.

    If you violate this policy yourself, you will have to bear the consequences. Therefore, it is impossible for you to find any unit to explain the law.

    As for the matter of superbirth, the state basically does not pursue the matter now, and some experts are even suggesting that birth restrictions be relaxed, but these do not mean that "the past superbirth behavior can be rehabilitated". Times are changing, the law is adjusting, and you can't use today's laws to go back in time. And for ordinary things, "the law is not as good as the past".

    When you ask this question, it only shows that you don't have a clear understanding of the law. It was still too reckless back then.

    As an aside: like that time, there seemed to be a lot of people who went to jail because of some trivial things. Now it seems that those little things will be fined at most, but now can you go back and pursue it? Because times are different ...

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    There is no doubt that there is no explanation, different laws are implemented in different eras, and they are implemented in accordance with policy laws, and there is no such thing as reconsideration.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The policies of different eras are different, and it is useless to find a unit when the current policy has changed.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I can't find an explanation, because you are breaking the policy and being overborn, and the policy at that time was to expel you, no way.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    In the 80s, there was a family planning law, and you were removed from the list for violating the law, which was in line with the law at the time.

    The legal principle in our country is that the past is not to blame, and you cannot use the laws that apply now to apply to the past. Everything has its historical context.

    Moreover, your matter is also a civil dispute retroactively, and according to the maximum retrospective period of 24 months under the Civil Procedure Law, you have already exceeded the time requirement. If you go to the unit again, I'm afraid no one will pay attention to you. And from 85 years to now, it was 35 years ago, and the people who participated in the handling of the incident at that time are probably already retired, or even passed away, who do you want to say?

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Summary. Generally speaking, if you were in a state-owned company at the time, or if you were in other formal jobs, you would have been fired.

    Generally speaking, if you were in a state-owned company at the time, or if you were in other formal jobs, you would have been fired.

    I said that I joined the work in 80 years, and the enterprise unit was born in 95 years, and was fired in 2000, and now I retire from 80 to 9l years is not considered to be the length of service.

    Oh, the question you are talking about is does it count as seniority.

    As long as the labor relationship is established and the time of work is counted, the length of service is bibi. According to Lao Ban Fa [1994] No. 376 issued by the General Office of the Ministry of Labor in 1994, employees who have been removed from the list for violating labor discipline may be counted as continuous service for the continuous length of service before the removal and the working hours after re-employment.

    Where employees are dismissed, it is still to be handled in accordance with the current provisions. Dismissal is the highest administrative sanction imposed by a unit on an employee who has touched an employee.

    Yes, 80 to 9l years are not counted as years of service, oh, that's it.

    Where can I appeal, but which department do I need to go to?

    Counting my 11 years of service, I receive more than 1,000 yuan less per month.

    Dear, you can ask a lawyer for consultation on this kind of more professional vote question, I believe it will be more helpful to you.

    Okay, thank you.

    Because the field I am good at is leisure and entertainment, and the secondary aspect is very clear.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Hello friends! In the 80s, family planning was the basic national policy of the state, not a policy formulated by the unit for your personal purpose, and when this kind of thing happens, it must be based on the national policy, and it is not the result of the unit leaders having opinions on you, so you should not ask the unit for an explanation.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    You only now think of finding an explanation, it's been too long, it was like this at that time, you are not allowed to have a second child, since you have a second child, you should be mentally prepared, now that so many years have passed, it is estimated that there is no explanation, because you are no longer a person from that unit,

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    What is the first thing to look for? On what grounds? Family planning is a basic national policy, and all units and individuals must implement it, because they are punished for overbirth, which is in line with the regulations at that time, and will not give you an explanation.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    It seems that you are looking for a unit to rehabilitate you? At that time, family planning was a national policy, and anyone who experienced that era knew that overbirth was a violation of national policy. All units carry out this practice, and all violations of family planning are punished.

    Removing you from the unit is also a last resort. Do you need to go to the unit to explain it?

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Family planning is a basic national policy.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    You are expelled from your superbirth, and it is useless to find a unit with a lot of expulsion from the eighty Xuan family planning Yan Chaosheng.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    State policy is so, only to observe.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Say no! In the past, family planning was the law of the country!

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    I can't find an explanation, it was this policy at that time, and if you violate the policy, you will be fired, so we have to abide by the law.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    What do you want to say? You could have paid the fine, so why not?

Related questions
8 answers2024-06-05

The pension at retirement consists of two parts: pension = basic pension + personal account pension. >>>More

11 answers2024-06-05

According to the regulations, if an employee leaves his or her job after 86 years (including not returning after overleave) or resigns from public office, and then rejoins the job, his or her working years. >>>More

14 answers2024-06-05

Hello, from 94 to 96 years, if you go to a junior college, then you will work in 95, it may be that you have come out for an internship in 95, and the internship is also counted as seniority, which can only be explained in this way.

6 answers2024-06-05

1. All public institutions in the country implement the post performance wage system, which consists of four parts: post salary, salary scale salary, performance salary and allowance and subsidy. Among them, post wages and salary scale wages are basic wages, and basic wages (post wages and salary scales) are implemented nationwide with unified policies and standards. >>>More

7 answers2024-06-05

I'm also a senior graduating from college and am currently interning at a company in Beijing. I've also encountered situations like yours, such as not being proficient in excel and often losing time. Although the boss also casually mentioned it, I knew that I had tried my best, although I would not but I was learning. >>>More