The house has not been lived in for five or six years, and the sewer on the first floor is blocked,

For the house to live in for five or six years, the first floor of the sewer is blocked, let the cost of equalization is reasonable, this needs to consider several factors to decide:

1.Responsibility for the maintenance and repair of the home: In general, the responsibility for the maintenance and repair of the home is shared by all owners. This includes the cost of repairs and unclogging of sewers. Therefore, if the sewer line is clogged, it is the responsibility of all owners to share the cost of repairs equally.

2.Causes of Sewer Blockage: If the sewer blockage is caused by the misconduct or negligence of one property owner, then that property owner should bear full or primary responsibility, and the other owners will not have to share the cost.

However, if the sewer blockage is due to a situation where the specific cause or responsible person cannot be identified, all owners may need to share the cost equally.

3.Usage of the house: If the house is not occupied for a long time, it may cause some degree of damage to the facilities and plumbing of the house. Therefore, in this case, the owner may need to bear more repair costs.

To sum up, for the question you raised, if the blockage of the sewer is due to the fact that the specific cause or responsible person cannot be identified, all owners may need to share the cost equally. However, if the blockage is caused by the misconduct or negligence of one property owner, then that property owner should bear full or major responsibility, and the other owners will not have to share the cost equally.

It is unreasonable, so the blockage is either caused by a person responsible or everyone's sewage discharge. If you don't live in it, you can't use it at all, and you can't be responsible. It must be shared among all permanent residents above the first floor.

It depends on the level of the property. In this case, according to the contract, as long as the property has carried out horizontal main pipe dredging according to the number of times agreed in the contract, the property has no primary responsibility。I would advise my people to go for it, and the riser is also unclogged once.

Regarding compensation, according to the Tort Liability Law, his approach should be to sue all the residents upstairs of him, regardless of whether they move in or not, and those who do not move in are in the law.

The court pleaded that it provided evidence of non-renovation and occupancy, and the rest could not be determined that the responsibility was shared equally among the other owners upstairs. This kind of similar court sentence has been similar to the high-altitude throwing object, and if the person responsible cannot be found, all the residents upstairs will be equally shared. The sewer pipes on the entire floor are E-type distribution, the sewer pipes on the first floor are public waterways, and all the sewers on the upper floors must pass through the sewer pipes on the first floor, that is, if the main trunk is blocked, the toilet cannot be used due to the backflow of water on a certain floor, and all residents have certain responsibilities.

From the law.

At the legal level, this has infringed on the legitimate rights and interests of the first floor, so it is appropriate for people to ask you to share the cost of pipeline dredging. If you can find out which household is responsible for the discharge of something that is blocking the drain, even better, and the household is fully responsible. Not sure?

We can only follow the principle of fairness, and everyone should bear it together. So in what cases does a sewer blockage require us to share the repair cost with the whole building? One of them is that the sewer in your house does not pass through the sewer pipe on the first floor; Second, a certain family.

If it is blocked, it will not return the water, and it will be responsible for itself, and it has nothing to do with us; Third: it is the blockage of the sewer pipe caused by disrepair, and this fault is borne by the property, and the public facilities and equipment are not repaired. Whether it is the first floor or the second floor, the sewer pipe is blocked, don't rush to dredge it first, first figure out what is the reason for the sewer pipe being blocked, is it the fault of the property or the resident?

It's better than if you don't have a good reason to go straight to the door"Ask for money"Better!

Definitely not, if the sewer downstairs is blocked, you only need to go downstairs.

Regardless of the reason, the cost should not be amortized. Even if each family needs to contribute some money, it should only be a small part, and it is by no means an equal share. Why do you need to spread the cost of repairs?

The main road is blocked? Then you should go straight to the property. What to fix yourself.

The main road is blocked because there is a problem with the public equipment, and it is generally solved by looking for the property. If it's just a general dredging, it should be free, because there are related services in the property fee. If it involves pipe replacement and excavation work is required, please refer to the relevant content of the service agreement signed with the property to negotiate the cost, but it should not be evenly shared.

Because part of the general property fee is the maintenance reserve, which is to solve the costs incurred in the maintenance and transformation of public pipelines and public equipment. Therefore, the majority of the property is out, and the others may be based on the actual situation or agreement, and the owners concerned are looking for a little more. But in any case, it should not be shared equally, what is the purpose of not paying the strata fee?

The owner has a lot of money and has nowhere to spend it? If you have seen the property, it is said that the cost needs to be shared equally by the owners. Then you need the subject to look at the property contract.

If there is indeed no provision in the contract for maintenance funds, it is advisable for the subject to appeal to the owners' committee and recommend that the property be replaced. Because there is no maintenance reserve fund means that if there is a problem with any public equipment and facilities in the community in the future, everyone needs to "raise funds" to deal with it, or no one will take care of it. In this way, it is better to directly change to a property company with good service.

If it is only the indoor branch pipe of a household on the first floor that is blocked, then there is no need to share the maintenance costs. Failure caused by poor use by oneself, and others have to share the maintenance cost equally, how can there be such a bandit logic. Whoever is broken will repair it, and solve the cost by themselves, so it is the most reasonable.

Therefore, the cost of repairs should not be shared equally, no matter what the case may be.

Questions. The owner and the property repaired themselves without the knowledge of our two families, and now let's share the loss of the owner's furniture, we have only moved here for more than ten days, so we have to compensate for the loss of others?

Don't pay for it, tell him to find a property.

Questions. Thank you, you're welcome.

I think it depends on the property, but I think it's all about a certain amount of responsibility.

The sewer downstairs is blocked, so why should the whole building share the repair cost?

Causing the blockage of the downstairs sewer is actually the responsibility of the residents of the entire building.

I don't think it's going to be like that, don't you have a property, and you paid so much money.

The property needs to take care of this, and it shouldn't be our share of the responsibility.

It doesn't sound like it's feasible, doesn't it, and you don't need to do it, just see if it's broken.

The sewer downstairs is blocked, why should the whole building share the repair cost but I think there is a certain responsibility.

I think this is a matter of making a proper judgment based on a certain situation.