-
He should not have personally assassinated the King of Qin, because after all, he was an aristocratic person, at best, he could only be regarded as an assassin but not a killer, and for the country, it should be a killer who assassinated the King of Qin.
-
It's to kill the King of Qin. Failed though.
-
From a personal point of view, Jing Ke was a hero, he was not afraid of the powerful forces of the Qin State and resolutely assassinated Qin Shi Huang. "The wind is sluggish and the water is cold, and the strong man is gone, and he will not return. "What a bold statement, what a boldness.
This is the ancient "chivalry", in order to repay the kindness of Prince Dan of Yan, he put his life outside the degree. This is the moving tragedy of "chivalry". The ancient heroes are not today's people, and the limitations of the times make them unable to understand the inevitable trend of history, and they can only measure the world by the traditional chivalrous virtues such as benevolence and righteousness.
Therefore, from the perspective of an ancient hero, Jing Ke is a well-deserved hero of the ages. How dignified and admirable is the title of "assassin", symbolizing the arrogance of chivalry, how can it be compared to those hidden killers? It really stained the sanctity of the "assassins".
Judging from the whole history, Jing Ke was wrong. The Qin State is strong, the Six Kingdoms are decaying, the weak eat the strong, and the fittest survive, how can Qin not have the idea of destroying the Six Kingdoms and unifying? In the face of Qiang Qin, instead of trying to make himself strong to fight against it, he tried in vain to use the shortcut of assassin assassination to stop Qin's offensive.
As everyone knows, the Yan State is weak, and even if the Qin State is stopped, it will not be long before other countries will appear to be eyeing the Qin State like the Qin State. Reunification has become inevitable, and any attempt to stop the wheel of history is futile, and only by following its development can we have a chance to survive. The ancients have already summed up the truth of "those who follow the heavens are born, and those who are against the heavens die", but how many people really understand it?
But those who know history can't force Jing Ke to understand all this, because he has no theory of productivity and production relations to guide him. Jing Ke's assassination of Qin, in my opinion, is also inevitable, even if there is no Jing Ke, there will be other Zhang San and Li Si appear. Any history has to move forward in twists and turns, and how can people who have been deprived of their benefits surrender without resisting.
Although Jing Ke was defeated, he also achieved fame, and at the same time showed the world the trend of historical development, and made people gradually accept the new thing - the unification of the six countries.
-
A man who remained in the annals of history as an assassin, he was an important figure in history, loyal, courageous, knowledgeable and resourceful!
-
Jing Ke, a patriot, ancestor of the Qi country. Born in Tianping Mountain, Linxian County, Henan.
Energy is the material basis for the survival and development of human society in the national economy. >>>More
In my opinion, the shortcomings of ERP software are mainly reflected in two aspects. >>>More
It has certain benefits in terms of increasing crop yields and quality, as well as shelf life and improving the quality of food, but it is a threat to biodiversity and may also be toxic. >>>More
This 2K17 has to be done in general, but there are several problems: >>>More
If the parents do not notarize the property before their death, or legislate a valid will, then all his immediate family members can come to collect this property, ah, of course, it has no impact on a normal family, but if it is a large group and a large enterprise, it is possible to cause the collapse of a group because of the trend of a helmsman, because everyone wants to get their own share of interests, and then they can't work together, and the enterprise will naturally fall apart. Therefore, I think the issue of property heirs should be more clear, clarifying the first and second heirs.