Is the US nuclear deterrence strategy a preemptive strike

The US nuclear deterrence strategy is not a preemptive strike. The US nuclear deterrence strategy mainly includes a strategy of all-out nuclear war, a strategy of mutually assured destruction, a strategy of ensuring survival, and a strategy of both offensive and defensive capabilities. The details are as follows:

1. Mutually assured destruction strategy: Its strategic intent is to maintain its "relative nuclear superiority" over the Soviet Union, that is, to require the establishment of a "second strike force" that can still "ensure the destruction" of the other side after encountering the opponent's nuclear attack.

This strategy focused on striking Soviet urban targets as a means of deterring the other side from launching a surprise nuclear attack on the United States. In order to realize this strategic vision, it was necessary to create a "second strike force" capable of striking urban targets in order to deter the Soviet Union's strategic attack.

2. Ensuring a strategy for survival: The basic point is to establish a system of nuclear strategic forces capable of both offense and defense and a counterattack system for space warfare to counter the enemy's nuclear strategic offensive and ensure the survival and security of the United States.

3. The strategy of both offense and defense: The basic point is that in terms of guiding ideology, it has shifted from "mutually assured destruction" to "seeking absolute superiority", emphasizing the integration of offensive and defensive nuclear forces; In terms of target selection, we have shifted from targeting a single target to all-round deterrence, emphasizing the diversification of the targets of nuclear deterrence.

In terms of force composition, it has shifted from relying mainly on offensive nuclear forces to simultaneously developing nuclear offensive, missile defense, and conventional strike capabilities, emphasizing the diversification of the means of nuclear strategy. In terms of arms control policy, the emphasis has shifted from multilateral and bilateral arms control negotiations to unilateral action, emphasizing autonomy in nuclear disarmament.

The U.S. nuclear deterrence strategy, like the verification warfare strategy, are two indispensable components of the nuclear strategy"A soldier who surrenders without a fight"the most ideal state; As long as nuclear war does not break out, the strategy of nuclear deterrence will work. In essence, the nuclear deterrence strategy is one"Mind Attack", which puts tremendous psychological pressure on the enemy, thereby preventing the outbreak of nuclear war.

Russia is a "preemptive" nuclear strategy.

The United States is a nuclear deterrence strategy of the new "triad" power structure.

Of course, it is not only the United States, but also the international community's current unified will.

Nuclear ** is not a joke, how can 200 countries in the world have it?

In other words, there can be no more countries that manufacture and possess nuclear weapons. Whether it is the United States or other countries, 99% of countries will be the same on this issue.

However, there are some countries that are duplicitous and say that they do not develop nuclear weapons, but in fact they are secretly operating some nuclear weapons and nuclear programs in an attempt to develop nuclear weapons. Iran, for example, has been sanctioned four times by the United Nations because of the opacity of its nuclear program.

This article mainly explains why the international community can no longer have nuclear weapons states.

1.Nuclear ** This kind of thing is not AK47, and not any country can afford to play, or will play.

This is related to the properties of nuclear **. If you want to develop nuclear uranium, you must master a relatively high enriched uranium technology, that is, the abundance of enriched uranium must reach about 90-95% before it can enter the ** level, which is ultra-high enriched uranium.

The enriched uranium abundance of general nuclear power plants is about 5%, which is extremely low enriched uranium. This is a purely civilian level.

20% is the threshold for highly enriched uranium, and although it seems that the abundance is not very high, the ability to refine to this level means that further development is possible. More than 90% of the words are more difficult, and not all countries can master the technology.

Some small countries cannot afford to have the conditions and technologies for similar research and development, and of course they cannot afford to play financially.

If all countries want to develop this **, it means that all countries are engaged in an arms race, and the world will never be at peace.

2.Nuclear ** is only a deterrent ** and cannot be used in real combat. In actual combat, they will destroy each other, leading to a catastrophe for humanity around the world.

Putting aside the two atomic bombs dropped on Japan, the nuclear ** produced by everyone in the next 30 years or so was actually for deterrence, not for use. That is, to achieve the goal of "surrendering the army without a fight".

In other words, these current nuclear states can basically be said to be rational countries. Each other will not use nuclear ** against each other.

Because if nuclear ** is used against a nuclear country, the other side will definitely retaliate, then as soon as the floodgates of a nuclear war are opened, the impact of nuclear proliferation will be global. Because nuclear weapons will spread to all parts of the world with water vapor, wind, ocean currents, etc., almost no life on the earth is immune to this pollution.

In the future, the peace and security of all mankind cannot be shared by more countries. After all, the more people there are, the greater the risk. In particular, some countries that do not have the ability to control nuclear power, or countries that are at war.

Their possession of nuclear weapons is tantamount to raising the risk of nuclear proliferation to a dangerous level.

That is why the international community has a nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which prohibits new countries from possessing nuclear weapons.

The main reason is that the United States considers itself to be the world's policeman, and the United States feels that the possession of nuclear weapons by other countries is too much of a threat to itself.

Because if only he has nuclear **, he can have the absolute right to speak, no country can compete with him, and when other countries have nuclear **, they will have the ability to confront him.

First of all, the United States wants to dominate one country, so that it can threaten the other side by force to achieve its own political goals; Secondly, the more high-sounding reason is to maintain world peace, because the nuclear ** is too destructive, and the United States, as the world's policeman, feels that it should do its best to prevent it.

Because the United States wants to be the dominant power and does not want other countries to develop, it will prevent other countries from having nuclear weapons.

The only one that can confront the United States is Russia。Russia's own strength is not weak, but its own level is not as good as that of the United States, and once there is no nuclear threat, Russia still has the ability to wrestle with the United States.

The United States has been the world hegemon for so many years, and it has always been very hegemonic in the international community。Of course, such a hegemonic United States will certainly arouse the disgust of many countries, and many countries will certainly stand up against it. It's like Japan, the younger brother of the United States in the past, but now it doesn't follow the United States and chooses to be self-reliant.

Of course, even if the United States does not use nuclear **, Japan will not be able to defeat the United States。This is because modern Japan was single-handedly supported by the United States, and the United States is clear about Japan's economic situation. If the United States dares to let Japan go, it must be because Japan has no sense of threat to it.

After all, Russia has inherited the legacy of the former Soviet Union, and the number of nuclear warheads alone can make Russian leaders wake up with a smile when they fall asleep.

Even if the nuclear ** is banned, Russia will have the strength to fight。This can be concluded from the comparison, so many countries in the world, if you add up the comprehensive national strength and other miscellaneous things, Russia is the strongest, of course, this has to exclude the United States. In the last century, when the Soviet Union was still a giant, the Soviet Union could compete with the United States.

In any aspect, the Soviet Union could compete with the United States, but of course there was no need to fight for territory, and the United States could not compare. Economically and militarily, the Soviet Union had the capital to compete with the United States, and later the United States got the nuclear ** out, and the Soviet Union was crushed. But Russian Maozi is not easy to mess with, it also took a few years to get the nuclear ** out.

Even if the nuclear ** is banned, Russia, which has inherited the legacy, can still compete with the United States. For example, in military technology, the MiG-25 and Tu-160 are a hurdle that Americans cannot overcome.

There is certainly no opponent, because the United States is very strict in their military management requirements.

As the world's only superpower, the United States has many extremely destructive nuclear powers, but if it does not use nuclear weapons, can it single-handedly take on other countries in the world?

Basically, there is no rival, because the US Air Force and Navy have no rivals.

This depends on whether the other countries will unite, and if they do, the United States will definitely have an adversary.

Even with nuclear bombs, no one is an opponent of the United States.

No, their policies are different, and many things are difficult to achieve unity, and this matter is no exception.

Probably not, they don't think that such a policy is good for the country, so there will be opponents.

I don't think so, because such an approach would threaten their status and authority, and would be very detrimental to the development of the country.

I think so, because this decision has a certain positive significance, which is good for the country and the people, so it has a particularly high reference significance.

The United States has not given any explanation or restriction on the use of nuclear weapons. But the United States, like other nuclear powers, will not launch a nuclear strike lightly, for the following reasons:

1.The destructive power of nuclear ** is enormous, and the United States will not use nuclear ** at will if it is not a world-class war.

2.The manufacturing cost of nuclear ** is high, difficult and dangerous, so the preciousness of nuclear ** can be imagined.

3.Although the quantity and quality of nuclear weapons in the United States are far superior to those of other countries, the United States is not inexhaustible.

4. Although no other nuclear power can compare with the United States in terms of technology and quantity, it is almost impossible for the United States to be unharmed if other nuclear powers launch a nuclear war against the United States.

It seems that there are no restrictions, unlike China with commitments.