Does the U.S. rebalance to the Asia Pacific include South Asia?

The scope of the U.S. rebalance to the Asia-Pacific includes South Asia and the countries and regions around the South China Sea, with the Asia-Pacific region referring to East Asia, South Asia, and the Pacific region.

The Asia-Pacific rebalance strategy is.

The United States put forward that it believed that there was an imbalance in the Asia-Pacific region during the two wars, the Iraq War, and the Afghanistan War, so the United States saw that the imbalance in the Asia-Pacific region was mainly due to two points, and the first point was that the military allies were in this area.

During this period, due to the weakening of economic ties, due to the weakening of security relations, the weakening of security contacts, and because the United States concentrated too much on the two wars, the Asia-Pacific allies showed a tendency to deviate from Germany, even relatively.

There is a sign of neutrality in China, and the so-called remarks that appeared at that time, relying on the United States for security and China for the economy, are very reluctant to be heard by the United States, because the United States is no longer capable of doing so.

To subversively undermine our relationship with its allies, so if this relationship develops, it will be a major warning to it. This is one aspect.

In addition, during this period, the so-called rebalancing means that China's strength has grown by leaps and bounds during this period, and our growth is growing on an annual basis, and the curve is very steep, while the United States believes that its influence in the Asia-Pacific region is declining, and its economic and military presence in the Asia-Pacific region, especially its economic presence, is declining.

Let's take one day, in the ASEAN Economic Forum, in the ASEAN countries and our ASEAN market, we are now ASEAN's largest partner, with more than $300 billion a year, while the United States has gradually declined from the first place, before 2006, to the current fourth, and it is still declining.

At this time, they feel that there is an imbalance problem, and these two imbalances, one is the relationship with the military allies, and the other is the growth of China's strength, and the relative economic strength of its strength has lost a balance, and it wants to find a rebalance, which is actually a strategic background for the slogan of returning to Asia.

First, after gaining dominance in Northeast Asia, the United States will step up its involvement in Southeast Asia and tighten constraints on China's claims in the South China Sea.

Second, after strengthening its military involvement in the Asia-Pacific region, the United States will reap economic gains by going on the offensive in the fields of economy, energy, education, values, people-to-people exchanges, and public diplomacy, and will use its soft power to influence Asian countries and win the hearts and minds of the people.

In essence, rebalancing is not a new concept, and it is still exploiting the misgivings of individual countries in China's neighborhood about China's development to strengthen the strategic position of the United States. The "Asia-Pacific rebalance" is seen as a further enhancement of the U.S. pivot to the Asia-Pacific region.

In March 2017, the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State, speaking of Trump's Asia-Pacific policy, said that the Obama-era Asia-Pacific rebalance had come to an end.

Because the United States has clearly identified China as the main adversary of its global hegemony.

Beginning in the second decade of the 21st century, the United States has shifted its global strategic focus to the Asia-Pacific region. The background to this is that the United States has clearly identified China as the main adversary of its global hegemony. The United States' use of China as its main adversary is completely in line with the logic of hegemony.

China is the only country after the collapse of the Soviet Union that can compete with the United States in all areas.

Gains and losses in the Asia-Pacific region will have an important impact not only on China and the United States, but also on the future development prospects and international status of many countries. With the gradual comprehensiveness of the Asia-Pacific pattern, the global geopolitical center of gravity will more clearly shift from Europe and the United States to the Asia-Pacific region.

Hello, happy to answer your <>

The Asia-Pacific rebalance strategy was put forward by US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and put forward by the United States, and it believes that during the two wars, during the Iraq War and the Afghanistan War, there was an imbalance in the Asia-Pacific region, so the United States can see that the Asia-Pacific imbalance is mainly based on two points, the first point is that during this period, the military allies have weakened their economic ties and security relations due to a weakening of their security relations, because the United States has concentrated too much on the two wars, which has caused the Asia-Pacific allies to have a tendency to deviate from GermanyThere is even a sign of neutrality relative to China, the so-called remarks that appeared at that time, relying on the United States for security and China for the economy, this kind of remarks are often unwilling to be heard by the United States, because the United States is no longer capable of subversively destroying our relations with its allies economically, so if this relationship develops, it will be a major warning to it.