A thirteen year old boy riding a tram with someone hit by a big car and injured by a cyclist, will t

In this case, according to the principle of protecting vulnerable groups, the traffic police should sentence the truck driver to full responsibility, so the truck driver should be held responsible? A thirteen-year-old boy riding a tram broke the law and could not be held responsible.

A 13-year-old boy is a minor. E-bikes fall under the bicycle range. There is no way for this person to pursue the law.

If a 13-year-old boy rides that electric car and gets hit by that big car, will he go to jail? I don't think he's of that legal age at his age, and I think if he had been injured, he probably wouldn't have gone to jail.

A thirteen-year-old boy riding a tram with someone was hit by a big car and injured, and the rider has no reason to pursue the cyclist, because the rider is not an adult, why do you want to ride the motorcycle? This matter should also be divided by the traffic police whose fault it is, and the traffic police will handle it.

Thirteen-year-old bicycle with people, itself is a great law, in the joy of violations, was hit by a car, should bear the main responsibility, and give the injured a certain amount of compensation, the car rider knows that the child violates the rules and sits also has a certain responsibility.

This depends on the judgment of the traffic police. 1: Minors are forbidden to ride on the road, let alone bring people. This is an illegal act.

2: Send a traffic accident, it depends on who violates the traffic rules on both sides, there is full responsibility, main responsibility, partial responsibility, no responsibility.

This family will definitely be held responsible, 13-year-olds can't ride an electric car on the road!

There is no point in pursuing it, the rider knows that the person riding the electric car is a minor, and let the belt, now the main thing is to see if the collision is serious or not, and quickly hospitalize, and the compensation has been determined by the traffic police department, which is the main thing to do.

A 13-year-old child riding an electric car with someone, this is definitely an illegal act, and now being hit by a big car and injured, as long as the responsibility is determined first, and then the responsibility is investigated, and appropriate compensation is given.

A 13-year-old child riding an electric car needs to be responsible for hitting and injuring people, depending on the size of the responsibility of both of you, if it is the responsibility of a minor person, the legal guardian of the minor shall bear the liability for compensation. Minors over the age of eight are persons with limited civil capacity, so the civil compensation for the 13-year-old child injured by the child shall be compensated by his guardian, that is, his parents. This responsibility is borne by the guardian, and if serious consequences are caused, such as serious injury, criminal liability may be incurred.

If the other party suffers losses, the guardian shall be jointly and severally liable for civil compensation. Since it is a minor, it is possible to pay compensation without the request of an adult. Even if it is a lawsuit, the case will not be measured by the standard of adult negligence.

Since it is not a motor vehicle accident, it cannot be implemented in accordance with the motor vehicle accident handling method, and can only be handled as a civil dispute. Therefore, the negligent party should be liable for civil compensation rather than traffic accident compensation. If the family is in difficulty, it is necessary to declare it to the relevant unit in a timely manner, and other ways can be used to compensate.

1. If an electric vehicle collides with a car, how to divide the responsibility.

1.If the driver of the electric vehicle is not at fault, the party of the car shall be liable for compensation;

2.If there is evidence to prove that the driver of the electric vehicle is at fault, the liability of the party with the car shall be appropriately reduced according to the degree of fault;

3.If the car party is not at fault, it shall bear no more than 10% of the compensation liability;

4.The loss of the traffic accident is caused by the intentional collision of the driver of the electric vehicle with the car, and the car party is not liable.

3. Whether it is illegal to ride an electric vehicle at the age of 13.

1.Illegal, minors have a relatively low level of proficiency in operating electric vehicles, and teenagers are prone to impulsiveness.

2.Minors' safety awareness is generally weak, and they do not have a good understanding of traffic rules, and there will be a series of dangerous actions such as not wearing helmets, illegal loading, overtaking, and wrong-way driving, which has great potential safety hazards.

Therefore, from a safety point of view, its judgment and response ability are relatively poor, and do not understand the relevant traffic laws, and the road can not deal with emergencies in time, it is easy to cause accidents, so minors under the age of 16 must not drive electric vehicles.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1165.

Principle of Fault LiabilityWhere the actor infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others and causes harm due to his fault, he shall bear tort liability.

Where it is presumed that the perpetrator is at fault in accordance with the provisions of law, and he cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability.

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1188.

Guardian ResponsibilityWhere a person with no or limited capacity for civil conduct causes harm to others, the guardian bears tort liability. Where guardians perform their guardianship duties, their tort liability may be reduced.

Where a person with property who lacks or has limited capacity for civil conduct causes harm to others, the early reputation of the relative shall pay compensation from his or her own property; The guardian shall compensate for the shortfall.