Which do you think is more beneficial to students, self confidence or crisis education? Why?

I still tend to self-confidence education, children should cultivate self-confidence from an early age, confident children are better at socializing, in today's society, people who are good at socializing can always take the lead, and confident children will naturally pursue higher goals, so as to satisfy their self-confidence.

Crisis education can easily cause children to be overstressed, which can lead to low self-esteem and even social phobia.

From my years of experience, I know that confident children are more likely to succeed!

I think self-confidence education is better. Because "self-confidence is the first secret of life", when I was in school, my homeroom teacher let each of us give a speech on stage every time I had a class meeting, to exercise our self-confidence, she taught us to treat others without being humble or arrogant, walking with our heads held high, step by step, so that we can have momentum. I am very grateful to this teacher, because it has also helped me develop a good habit of "self-confidence", which has played a vital role in shaping my personality.

As for the sense of crisis, it will make people always in a state of "ready to fly", and I think it will affect a child's mental health, so I think self-confidence education is more important.

I think crisis education is more beneficial to students, because the bad guys in the world now, all kinds of tricks, people can't guess what they do, and many students are hurt because of their zeal.

From a dialectical point of view, there is no conflict between the two.

Isn't it better for self-confidence education to be the skeleton and crisis education to be the wings?

Children should cultivate self-confidence from an early age, so that they are more attractive to the subject, and as they grow up, they should let children experience the crisis of the current society, and they should not slack off in times of peace, in response to the old saying "strategically despise the enemy to have self-confidence, and tactically attach importance to the enemy to have a sense of crisis".

I think self-confidence education is more important, because in my cognition, although a person has self-confidence may not be able to solve the problem well, but the person without self-confidence must not be able to deal with the problem well, so the self-confident person will face the problem in the face of the crisis and think to solve it.

In fact, both are needed by students, appropriate self-confidence can give them the confidence to do well in the face of difficult affairs, and crisis education can allow them to appropriately avoid some obvious pitfalls and losses.

Confident education, individuals also prefer to grow in such an educational environment. Crisis education may be more effective, but I don't think it's good for people's mental health.

I think crisis education is more beneficial, and it is important for students to have a sense of crisis at all times and not to relax.

Education is aimed at people, so it is best to look at which one is suitable for different students, some students may be suitable for self-confidence, and some students are suitable for crisis. Individualized.

I think it is self-confidence education to give children strong self-confidence, and I think it is particularly important, and crisis education can be supplemented.